Review "Case: Revised training for the U.S. Navy" in Chapter 4 of the textbook, and respond to the prompts below. You are not required to answer the questions at the end of the case study in the textb

Energizing Training Means Better Learning and Transfer of Training

Boring lectures, lack of meaningful content in e-learning, training that doesn’t give employees the opportunity to practice and receive feedback, training that takes too long to complete—all demotivate trainees and make it difficult for them to learn and use what they have learned on the job. However, many companies are using innovative instructional methods to make training more interesting and accessible to help trainees learn and apply it to their work.

Panda Restaurant Group, the largest family-owned and operated restaurant group in the United States (you may be familiar with Panda Express, Panda Inn, or Hibachi-San), has more than 2,000 stores, 1,800 managers, and 40,000 associates. The company wants to grow to 10,000 stores but in a way that supports its mission, “To deliver exceptional Asian dining experiences by building an organization where people are inspired to build better lives.” To do so and support one of the company’s core values, “Great Operations,” Panda invests in training. To ensure that training programs help associates learn, they are designed to engage associates and provide them with the opportunity to interact with fellow trainees as well as the training content. As a result, Panda use a variety of training methods including instructor-led training, videos, e-learning, and on-the-job training.

The talent development team at BMO, a financial services company, launched a new mobile, anywhere, anytime learning platform and immediately saw increased employee participation in learning. The learning page 153platform offers chunks of high-quality content including podcasts, articles, videos, e-books, and a range of online courses. The company reports that employees like the variety of resources and the ease of fitting learning into their busy schedules.

Veeam, a company that sells software and cloud computing solutions, trains new sales employees using a combination of classroom training, on the job experience through shadowing more experienced sales persons, role-plays, and online courses.

The success of Embark and Barista Essentials relies on both formal training and practical experience. Union Market’s training lab is the formal environment where baristas learn the basics. But it is in the cafés, where baristas spend extended time at either the pour-over or espresso station, that they can learn a technique. In the training lab, a café team of baristas, a lead barista, and a café leader work together to learn pour-over, espresso, and milk skills. Back in the cafés, the same team adapts quickly to multitasking under pressure, making every beverage to order without a trainer’s guidance.

Sources: Based on J. Sun and D. Pena, “How Panda Restaurant Group, Inc., Invests in Its People,” training, October 2019, pp. 50–51; “Our Culture,” Panda Restaurant Group, from www.pandacareer.com, accessed January 15, 2021; S. Castello, “Digital Transformation Starts with People,” T+D, October 2019, pp. 39–40; “Top 125 2020 Rankings 96–100: Veeam,” training, March/April 2020, p. 68; J. Washburn, “Training Baristas from the Ground(s) Up,” T+D, January 2019, pp. 23–25.

Introduction

Although they use different methods, the purpose of the training at the companies just described is to help employees learn so they can perform their jobs successfully. Regardless of the training method, certain conditions must be present for learning to occur and for employees to use what they have learned on the job. These include (1) providing opportunities for trainees to practice and receive feedback (i.e., information about how well people are meeting the training objectives), (2) offering meaningful training content, (3) identifying any prerequisites that trainees need to complete the program successfully, (4) allowing trainees to learn through observation and experience, and (5) ensuring that the work environment, including managers and peers, supports learning and the use of learned skills on the job. For example, feedback from trainers is provided during the role plays used by Veeam. The meaningfulness of what is being learned is enhanced at Union Market by having learners work on equipment that is identical to what they will use on the job. BMO provides training content to match trainees’ preferences about how they want to learn.

As you may have recognized by now, this chapter emphasizes not only what has to occur during training sessions for learning to occur, but also how to ensure that trainees use what they have learned on the job. That is, this chapter discusses both learning and transfer of training. Learning refers to a relatively permanent change in human capabilities that can include knowledge, skills, attitudes, behaviors, and competencies that are not the result of growth processes.1 A key part of learning is that trainees commit to memory (i.e., remember) what they have learned and recall it. Transfer of training refers to trainees effectively and continually applying what they have learned in training to their jobs.2 As the organizations in the chapter opener illustrate, trainee characteristics, the design of the training program (or what occurs during training), and the work environment influence whether trainees learn and use or apply what they have learned to their jobs. Figure 4.1 presents a model of learning and transfer of training. As the model shows, transfer of training includes both the generalization of training to the job and maintenance of learned material. Generalization refers to a trainee’s ability to apply what has been learned to on-the-job work problems and situations that are similar but not necessarily identical to those problems and situations encountered in the learning environment (i.e., the training program). Maintenance refers to the process of trainees continuing to use what they have learned over time.

FIGURE 4.1 A Model of Learning and Transfer of Training

page 154 

It is important to realize that for training to be effective, both learning and transfer of training are needed. Trainees can fail or incorrectly apply training content (what was emphasized in training) to their jobs, either because the training was not conducive to learning, or the work environment does not provide them with the opportunity to use training content or fails to support its correct use, or both. Also, it is a mistake to consider transfer of training as something to be concerned about after training because it deals with the use of training content on the job. Instead, transfer of training should be considered during the design or purchase of training. If you wait until after training to consider transfer of training, it is likely too late. Trainees’ perceptions of the work environment and its support for training have likely influenced their motivation to learn and what, if anything, they have learned (recall the discussion of motivation to learn in Chapter Three, “Needs Assessment”).

This chapter coverage is based on the model shown in Figure 4.1. First, we discuss learning. We begin by identifying what is to be learned—that is, the learning outcomes. Learning outcomes should be related to what is required to perform the job successfully. As the chapter opener illustrates, this may include selling products, providing services, working with operating systems, or developing and fixing software. As a student, you are familiar with one type of learning outcome: intellectual skills. We also discuss how trainees’ learning style may influence the way they prefer to learn. The influence of other trainee characteristics—such as basic skills, cognitive ability, self-efficacy, age, and interests—on motivation to learn and learning was discussed in Chapter Three.

Next, we consider training design. Training design includes consideration of how to create a learning environment that will help the trainee acquire the learning outcomes. We discuss various learning and transfer of training theories. Last, we look at how these theories are used to create a learning environment and supportive work environment designed to help the trainee learn the desired outcomes and apply them on the job.

What Is Learning? What Is Learned?

Understanding learning outcomes is crucial because they influence the characteristics of the training environment that are necessary for learning to occur. For example, if trainees are to master motor skills such as climbing a pole, they must have opportunities to practice climbing and receive feedback about their climbing skills. Learning outcomes are presented in Table 4.1.

page 155 

TABLE 4.1 Learning Outcomes

Type of

Learning

Outcome Description of Capability Example

Verbal information State, tell, or describe previously stored information. State three reasons for following company safety procedures.

Intellectual skills Apply generalizable concepts and rules to solve problems and generate novel products. Design and code a computer program that meets customer requirements.

Motor skills Execute a physical action with precision and timing. Shoot a gun and consistently hit a small moving target.

Attitudes Choose a personal course of action. Choose to respond to all incoming mail within 24 hours.

Cognitive strategies Manage one’s own thinking and learning processes. Use three different strategies selectively to diagnose engine malfunctions.

Sources: Based on R. Gagne and K. Medsker, The Conditions of Learning (New York: Harcourt-Brace, 1996); K. Kapp, “Matching the Right Design Strategy to the Right Content,” T+D, July 2011, pp. 48–52.

Verbal information includes names or labels, facts, and bodies of knowledge. Verbal information includes specialized knowledge that employees need in their jobs. For example, a manager must know the names of different types of equipment as well as the body of knowledge related to Total Quality Management (TQM).

Intellectual skills include concepts and rules, which are critical to solve problems, serve customers, and create products. For example, a manager must know the steps in the performance appraisal process (e.g., gather data, summarize data, or prepare for an appraisal interview with an employee) in order to conduct an employee appraisal.

Motor skills include coordination of physical movements. For example, a telephone repair person must have the coordination and dexterity required to climb ladders and telephone poles.

Attitudes are a combination of beliefs and feelings that predispose a person to behave a certain way. Attitudes include a cognitive component (beliefs), an affective component (feeling), and an intentional component (the way a person intends to behave with regard to the focus of the attitude). Important work-related attitudes include job satisfaction, commitment to the organization, and job involvement. Suppose you say that an employee has a “positive attitude” toward her work. This means the person likes her job (the affective component). She may like her job because it is challenging and provides an opportunity to meet people (the cognitive component). Because she likes her job, she intends to stay with the company and do her best at work (the intentional component). Training programs may be used to develop or change attitudes because attitudes have been shown to be related to physical and mental withdrawal from work, turnover, and behaviors that affect the well-being of the company (e.g., helping new employees).

Cognitive strategies regulate the processes of learning. They relate to the learner’s decision regarding what information to attend to (i.e., pay attention to), how to remember information, and how to solve problems. For example, a physicist recalls the colors of the light spectrum through remembering the name “Roy G. Biv” (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet).

As this chapter points out, each learning outcome requires a different set of conditions for learning to occur. Before this chapter investigates the learning process in detail, it looks at the theories that help explain how people learn.

page 156 

Learning Theories

Each theory about how people learn relates to different aspects of the learning process. Many of the theories also relate to trainees’ motivation to learn, which was discussed in Chapter Three. The application of these theories for instruction and program design are discussed later in this chapter and also in Chapter Five, “Program Design.”

Reinforcement Theory

Reinforcement theory emphasizes that people are motivated to perform or avoid certain behaviors because of past outcomes that have resulted from those behaviors.3 There are several processes in reinforcement theory. Positive reinforcement is a pleasurable outcome resulting from a behavior. Negative reinforcement is the removal of an unpleasant outcome. For example, consider a machine that makes screeching and grinding noises unless the operator holds levers in a certain position. The operator will learn to hold the levers in that position to avoid the noises. The process of withdrawing positive or negative reinforcers to eliminate a behavior is known as extinction. Punishment is presenting an unpleasant outcome after a behavior, leading to a decrease in that behavior. For example, if a manager yells at employees when they are late, they may avoid the yelling by being on time (but they may also call in sick, quit, or fool the boss into not noticing when they arrive late).

From a training perspective, reinforcement theory suggests that for learners to acquire knowledge, change behavior, or modify skills, the trainer needs to identify what outcomes the learner finds most positive (and negative). Trainers then need to link these outcomes to learners’ acquiring knowledge or skills or changing behaviors. As was mentioned in Chapter Three, learners can obtain several types of benefits from participating in training programs. The benefits may include learning an easier or more interesting way to perform their job (job-related), meeting other employees who can serve as resources when problems occur (personal), or increasing opportunities to consider new positions in the company (career-related). According to reinforcement theory, trainers can withhold or provide these benefits to learners who master program content. The effectiveness of learning depends on the pattern or schedule for providing these reinforcers or benefits. Similarly, managers can provide these benefits to help ensure transfer of training.

Behavior modification is a training method that is primarily based on reinforcement theory. For example, a training program in a bakery focused on eliminating unsafe behaviors such as climbing over conveyor belts (rather than walking around them) and sticking hands into equipment to dislodge jammed materials without turning off the equipment.4 Employees were shown slides depicting safe and unsafe work behaviors. After viewing the slides, employees were shown a graph of the number of times that safe behaviors were observed during past weeks. Employees were encouraged to increase the number of safe behaviors they demonstrated on the job. They were given several reasons for doing so: for their own protection, to decrease costs for the company, and to help their plant get out of last place in the safety rankings of the company’s plants. Immediately after the training, safety reminders were posted in employees’ work areas. Data about the number of safe behaviors performed by employees continued to be collected and displayed on the graph in the work area following the training. Employees’ supervisors were also instructed to recognize workers whenever they saw them performing a safe work behavior. In this example, the safe-behavior data posted in the work areas and supervisors’ recognition of safe work behaviors represent positive reinforcers.

Social Learning Theory

Social learning theory emphasizes that people learn by observing other people (models) who they believe are credible and knowledgeable.5 Social learning theory also recognizes that behavior that is reinforced or page 157rewarded tends to be repeated. The models’ behavior or skill that is rewarded is adopted by the observer. According to social learning theory, learning new skills or behaviors comes from (1) directly experiencing the consequences of using that behavior or skill, or (2) the process of observing others and seeing the consequences of their behavior.6

According to social learning theory, learning also is influenced by a person’s self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is a person’s judgment about whether he or she can successfully learn knowledge and skills. Chapter Three emphasizes self-efficacy as an important factor to consider in the person analysis phase of needs assessment. Why? Self-efficacy is one determinant of readiness to learn. A trainee with high self-efficacy will make efforts to learn in a training program and will be most likely to persist in learning even if an environment is not conducive to learning (e.g., a noisy training room). In contrast, a person with low self-efficacy will have self-doubts about mastering the content of a training program and will be more likely to withdraw psychologically and/or physically (e.g., daydream or fail to attend the program). These persons believe that they are unable to learn and that, regardless of their effort level, they will be unable to learn.

A person’s self-efficacy can be increased using several methods: verbal persuasion, logical verification, observation of others (modeling), and past accomplishments.7 Verbal persuasion means offering words of encouragement to convince others they can learn. Logical verification involves perceiving a relationship between a new task and a task already mastered. Trainers and managers can remind employees when they encounter learning difficulties that they have been successful at learning similar tasks. Modeling involves having employees who already have mastered the learning outcomes demonstrate them for trainees. As a result, employees are likely to be motivated by the confidence and success of their peers. Past accomplishments refers to allowing employees to build a history of successful accomplishments. Managers can place employees in situations where they are likely to succeed and provide training so that employees know what to do and how to do it.

Social learning theory suggests that four processes are involved in learning: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and motivational processes (see Figure 4.2).

FIGURE 4.2 Processes of Social Learning Theory

Sources: Based on A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thoughts and Actions (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986); P. Taylor, D. Russ-Eft, and D. Chan, “A Meta-Analytic Review of Behavior Modeling Training,” Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005), pp. 692–709.

Attention suggests that persons cannot learn by observation unless they are aware of the important aspects of a model’s performance. Attention is influenced by characteristics of the model and the learner. Learners must be aware of the skills or behavior they are supposed to observe. The model must be clearly identified and credible. The learner must have the physical capability (sensory capability) to observe the model. Also, a learner who has successfully learned other skills or behavior by observing the model is more likely to attend to the model.

Learners must remember the behaviors or skills that they observe. This is the role of retention. Learners have to code the observed behavior and skills in memory in an organized manner so they can recall them for the appropriate situation. Behaviors or skills can be coded as visual images (symbols) or verbal statements.

page 158 

Motor reproduction involves trying out the observed behaviors to see if they result in the same reinforcement that the model received. The ability to reproduce the behaviors or skills depends on the extent to which the learner can recall the skills or behavior. The learner must also have the physical capability to perform the behavior or exhibit the skill. For example, a firefighter can learn the behaviors necessary to carry a person away from a dangerous situation, but may be unable to demonstrate the behavior because of a lack of upper body strength. Note that performance of behavior is usually not perfect on the first attempt. Learners must have the opportunity to practice and receive feedback to modify their behavior to be similar to the model behavior.

Learners are more likely to adopt a modeled behavior if it results in positive outcomes. Social learning theory emphasizes that behaviors that are reinforced (a motivational process) will be repeated in the future. For example, a major source of conflict and stress for managers often relates to the performance appraisal interview. A manager may, through observing successful managers, learn behaviors that allow employees to be more participative in a performance appraisal interview (e.g., give employees the opportunity to voice their concerns). If the manager uses this behavior in the performance appraisal interview and the behavior is rewarded by employees (e.g., they make comments such as, “I really felt the feedback meeting was the best we have ever had”) or the new behavior leads to reduced conflicts with employees (negative reinforcement), the manager will be more likely to use this behavior in subsequent appraisal interviews.

As you will see in the discussion of training methods in Chapters Seven, “Traditional Training Methods,” and Eight, “Technology-Based Training Methods,” social learning theory is the primary basis for behavior modeling training and has influenced how models are used in videos, which can be part of face-to-face, online, or mobile training programs. For example, to train customer-facing employees about its new pricing plans, Verizon used videos showing the best way to talk to customers.8

Goal Theories

Goal Setting Theory

Goal setting theory assumes that behavior results from a person’s conscious goals and intentions.9 Goals influence a person’s behavior by directing energy and attention, sustaining effort over time, and motivating the person to develop strategies for goal attainment.10 Research suggests that specific, challenging goals result in better performance than vague, unchallenging goals.11 Goals have been shown to lead to high performance only if people are committed to the goal. Employees are less likely to be committed to a goal if they believe that it is too difficult.

An example of how goal setting theory influences training methods is seen in a program designed to improve pizza deliverers’ driving practices.12 The majority of pizza deliverers are young (ages 18–24) and inexperienced drivers, who are compensated based on the number of pizzas they can deliver. This creates a situation in which deliverers are rewarded for fast but unsafe driving practices—for example, not wearing a safety belt, failing to use turn signals, and not coming to complete stops at intersections. These unsafe practices have resulted in a high driving accident rate.

Prior to goal setting, pizza deliverers were observed by their managers leaving the store and then returning from deliveries. The managers observed the number of complete stops at intersections over a one-week period. In the training session, managers and trainers presented the deliverers with a series of questions for discussion, such as: In what situations should you come to a complete stop? What are the reasons for coming to a complete stop? What are the reasons for not coming to a complete stop?

After the discussion, pizza deliverers were asked to agree on the need to come to a complete stop at intersections. Following the deliverers’ agreement, the managers shared the data they collected regarding the number of complete stops at intersections they had observed the previous week. (Complete stops were made page 15955 percent of the time.) The trainer asked the pizza deliverers to set a goal for complete stopping over the next month. They decided on a goal of 75 percent complete stops.

After the goal setting session, managers at each store continued observing their drivers’ intersection stops. The following month in the work area, a poster showed the percentages of complete stops for every four-day period. The current percentage of total complete stops was also displayed.

Goal setting theory is also used in training program design. Goal setting theory suggests that learning can be facilitated by providing trainees with specific challenging goals and objectives. Specifically, the influence of goal setting theory can be seen in the development of training lesson plans. Lesson plans begin with specific goals, providing information regarding the expected action that the learner will demonstrate, conditions under which learning will occur, and the level of performance that will be judged acceptable. Goals can also be part of action plans or application assignments that are used to motivate trainees to transfer training.

Goal Orientation

Goal orientation refers to the goals held by a trainee in a learning situation. Goal orientation can include a learning orientation or a performance orientation. Learning orientation relates to trying to increase one’s ability or competence in a task. People with a learning orientation believe that training success is defined as showing improvement and making progress; prefer trainers who are more interested in how trainees are learning than in how they are performing; and view errors and mistakes as part of the learning process. Performance orientation refers to learners who focus on task performance and how they compare to others. Persons with a performance orientation define success as high performance relative to others; value high ability more than learning; and find that errors and mistakes cause anxiety and want to avoid them.

Goal orientation is believed to affect the amount of effort that a trainee will expend in learning (motivation to learn). Learners with a high learning orientation will direct greater attention to the task and learn for the sake of learning, as opposed to learners with a performance orientation. Learners with a performance orientation will direct more attention to performing well and less effort to learning. Research has shown that trainees with a learning orientation exert greater effort to learn and use more complex learning strategies than do trainees with a performance orientation.13 There are several ways to create a learning orientation in trainees.14 These include setting goals around learning and experimenting with new ways of having trainees perform trained tasks rather than emphasizing trained-task performance; deemphasizing competition among trainees; creating a community of learning (discussed later in the chapter); and allowing trainees to make errors and to experiment with new knowledge, skills, and behaviors during training.

Need Theories

Need theories help explain the value that a person places on certain outcomes. A need is a deficiency that a person is experiencing at any point in time. A need motivates a person to behave in a manner that satisfies the deficiency. The need theories of Abraham Maslow and Clayton Alderfer focused on physiological needs, relatedness needs (the need to interact with other persons), and growth needs (self-esteem and self-actualization).15 Both Maslow and Alderfer believed that persons begin by trying to satisfy needs at the lowest level and then progress up the hierarchy as lower-level needs are satisfied. That is, if physiological needs are not met, a person’s behavior will continue to focus on satisfying these needs before relatedness or growth needs receive attention. The major difference between Alderfer’s and Maslow’s needs hierarchies is that Alderfer allows the possibility that if higher-level needs are not satisfied, employees may refocus on lower-level needs.

David McClelland’s need theory focused primarily on needs for achievement, affiliation, and power.16 According to McClelland, these needs can be learned. The need for achievement relates to a concern for page 160attaining and maintaining self-set standards of excellence. The need for affiliation involves concern for building and maintaining relationships with other people and for being accepted by others. The need for power is a concern for obtaining responsibility, influence, and reputation.

Need theories suggest that to motivate learning, trainers should identify trainees’ needs and communicate how training program content relates to fulfilling these needs. Also, if certain basic needs of trainees (e.g., physiological and safety needs) are not met, they are unlikely to be motivated to learn. For example, consider a budgeting software training class for secretaries in a company that is downsizing. It is doubtful that even the best-designed training class will result in learning if employees believe that their job security is threatened (unmet need for security) by the company’s downsizing strategy. Also, it is unlikely the secretaries will be motivated to learn if they believe that the budgeting skills emphasized in the program will not help them keep their current employment or increase their chances of finding another job inside (or even outside) the company.

Another implication of need theory relates to providing employees with a choice of training programs to attend. As mentioned in Chapter Three, giving employees a choice of which training course to attend can increase their motivation to learn. This occurs because trainees are able to choose programs that best match their needs.

Expectancy Theory

Expectancy theory suggests that a person’s behavior is based on three factors: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence.17 Beliefs about the link between trying to perform a behavior and actually performing well are called expectancies. Expectancy is similar to self-efficacy. In expectancy theory, a belief that performing a given behavior (e.g., attending a training program) is associated with a particular outcome (e.g., being able to better perform your job) is called instrumentality. Valence is the value that a person places on an outcome (e.g., how important it is to perform better on the job).

According to expectancy theory, various choices of behavior are evaluated according to their expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. Figure 4.3 shows how behavior is determined based on finding the mathematical product of expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. People choose the behavior with the highest value.

FIGURE 4.3 Expectancy Theory of Motivation

From a training perspective, expectancy theory suggests that learning is most likely to occur when employees believe that they can learn the content of the program (expectancy). Also, learning and transfer of training are enhanced when they are linked to outcomes such as better job performance, a salary increase, or peer recognition (instrumentality), and when employees value these outcomes (valence).

page 161 

Adult Learning Theory

Adult learning theory was developed out of a need for a specific theory of how adults learn. Most educational theories, as well as formal educational institutions, have been developed exclusively to educate children and youths. Pedagogy, the art and science of teaching children, has dominated educational theory. Pedagogy gives the instructor the major responsibility for making decisions about learning content, method, and evaluation. Students are generally seen as (1) being passive recipients of directions and content and (2) bringing few experiences that may serve as resources to the learning environment.18

Educational psychologists, recognizing the limitations of formal education theories, developed andragogy, the theory of adult learning. Malcolm Knowles is most frequently associated with adult learning theory. Knowles’s model is based on several assumptions:19

Adults have the need to know why they are learning something.

Adults have a need to be self-directed.

Adults bring more work-related experiences into the learning situation.

Adults enter a learning experience with a problem-centered approach to learning.

Adults are motivated to learn by both extrinsic and intrinsic motivators.

Adult learning theory is especially important to consider in developing training programs because the audience for many such programs tends to be adults, most of whom have not spent a majority of their time in a formal education setting. Table 4.2 shows implications of adult learning theory for learning.

TABLE 4.2 Implications of Adult Learning Theory for Training

Design Issue Implications

Self-concept Mutual planning and collaboration in instruction

Experience Use learner experience as basis for examples and applications

Readiness Develop instruction based on the learner’s interests and competencies

Time perspective Immediate application of content

Orientation to learning Problem-centered instead of subject-centered

Consider how adult learning theory is incorporated into training programs.20 To help New York Life Insurance Company’s early career product consultants—employees who support sales agents by phone—improve their presentation skills so they can move from a support role to a sales role, the company’s learning and development team designed a year-long program that combines five months of classroom training with five months of practice, feedback, and coaching and includes an action learning project. The action learning project presents groups of career product consultants with an important business problem. As a group they decide on a solution and present it to the company’s senior leaders.21 Yapi ve Kredi Bank’s program to help managers improve their skills in motivating and coaching their employees includes classroom sessions in which trainers review case studies of common situations in coaching and provide students with online readings and videos. Senior managers review coaching and development techniques, and program participants are given coaching assignments to complete with their peers. The first-line manager course at B&W Pantex focuses on soft skills as well as human resource (HR) policies, discipline, and supervision using instructor-led training with video presentations and role playing. The course includes real-life scenarios based on actual situations that have occurred in its facilities. The program also includes on-the-job training in which trained and qualified subject-matter experts (SMEs) teach tasks and procedures. Brown-Forman, one of the page 162largest companies in the global wine and spirits industry (its brands include Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey, Southern Comfort, Findlandia vodka, and Herradura tequila), created a two-and-a-half-day training program focused on helping the company’s marketing professionals build the brand. The company’s chief marketing officer visits the class to explain the importance of the course’s content and why it was developed. In the course, participants work in teams to develop a brand campaign for a sample brand. This includes making presentations and completing exercises. Representatives from Brown-Forman’s creative agencies attend the program, part of which involves interacting with consumers to identify their drinking patterns and preferences. At the end of the program, participant teams present their final project to a panel of senior marketing executives who serve as judges.

Information Processing Theory

Compared to other learning theories, information processing theories give more emphasis to the internal processes that occur when training content is learned and retained. Figure 4.4 shows a model of information processing. Information processing theories propose that information or messages taken in by the learner undergo several transformations in the human brain.22 Information processing begins when a message or stimulus (which could be a sound, smell, touch, or picture) from the environment is received by receptors (i.e., ears, nose, skin, and eyes). The message is registered in the senses and stored in short-term memory, and then it is transformed or coded for storage in long-term memory. A search process occurs in memory, during which time a response to the message or stimulus is organized. The response generator organizes the learner’s response and tells the effectors (muscles) what to do. The “what to do” instruction relates to one of the five learning outcomes: verbal information, cognitive skills, motor skills, intellectual skills, or attitudes. The final link in the model is feedback from the environment. This feedback provides the learner with an evaluation of the response given. This information can come from another person or the learner’s observation of the results of his or her own action. A positive evaluation of the response provides reinforcement that the behavior is desirable and should be stored in long-term memory for use in similar situations.

FIGURE 4.4 A Model of Human Information Processing

Sources: Based on R. Gagne, “Learning Processes and Instruction,” Training Research Journal 1 (1995/96), pp. 17–28; D. Rock, “Your Brain on Learning,” Chief Learning Officer, May 2015, pp. 30–48.

Besides emphasizing the internal processes needed to capture, store, retrieve, and respond to messages, the information processing model highlights how external events influence learning. These events include:23

Changes in the intensity or frequency of the stimulus that affect attention.

Informing the learner of the objectives to establish an expectation.

Enhancing perceptual features of the material (stimulus), drawing the attention of the learner to certain features.

Verbal instructions, pictures, diagrams, and maps suggesting ways to code the training content so that it can be stored in memory.

page 163Meaningful learning context (examples, problems) creating cues that facilitate coding.

Demonstration or verbal instructions helping to organize the learner’s response, as well as facilitating the selection of the correct response.

Transfer of Training Theory

Transfer of training is more likely to occur when the trainee works on tasks during training (e.g., knowledge, equipment, or processes) that are very similar, if not identical, to the work environment (near transfer). Transfer of training is more difficult when tasks during training are different from the work environment (far transfer), such as applying customer service principles to an interaction with an angry customer in front of a long line of customers at a check-out counter. The tasks that are used during training should relate to the training objectives.

Closed skills refer to training objectives that are linked to learning specific skills that are to be identically produced by the trainee on the job. There is only one correct way to complete a task if it requires closed skills. In contrast, open skills are linked to more general learning principles. Customer service skills are an example of open skills. There is not a single correct way to perform and the learner is given some general principles to follow. For example, a sales clerk is likely trained on general principles or processes for how to interact with an angry customer but has the freedom to choose from among those principles in an actual interaction, because the customer’s intentions and responses are not entirely predictable.24 Open skills are more difficult to train than closed skills because they require the trainee to not only acquire and recall general principles, but also to consider how they can be adapted and used to fit a wide range of circumstances, many of which cannot be practiced during training. Also, manager and peer support on the job is important for giving the trainee the opportunity to learn by seeing how experienced employees use the skills and to get feedback when the trainee has the chance to apply them. Later in this chapter, we discuss the implications of transfer of training theories for designing training. In Chapter Five, we will discuss how specific training program design features can facilitate learning and transfer of both open and closed skills.

Consider the transfer of training issues that Continental Airlines faced in preparing its pilots to fly the 787 Dreamliner airplane.25 First, Continental flew the airplane on its U.S. routes to familiarize flight and ground crew staff with it. Continental trained approximately 24 pilots for each plane that was delivered. The 787 flight deck was similar but not identical to the 777 airplane that Continental’s pilots were currently flying. Training included use of a flight simulator of the 787 and computer-based courses. One of the most difficult tasks for pilots was becoming familiar with a display that drops down in front of them, providing important flight information. The purpose of the display is to improve visibility during difficult flying conditions. Pilots liked the display but found that it takes time to get used to it because it requires them to adjust their depth perception.

Three theories of transfer of training have implications for training design (the learning environment): the theory of identical elements, the stimulus generalization approach, and the cognitive theory of transfer.26 Table 4.3 shows each theory’s primary emphasis and the most appropriate conditions for its consideration.

TABLE 4.3 Transfer of Training Theories

Theory of Identical Elements

The theory of identical elements proposes that transfer of training occurs when what is being learned in the training session is identical to the tasks the trainee has to perform on the job.27 Transfer will be maximized to the degree that the tasks, materials, equipment, and other characteristics of the learning environment are similar to those encountered in the work environment.

page 164 

The use of identical elements theory is shown in the hostage training simulation used by the Baltimore Police Department. The Baltimore Police Department needed to teach police sergeants the skills to handle hostage-barricade situations in which lives are at stake—skills such as negotiating with a troubled husband holding his wife and/or children hostage. The first hour of a hostage situation is critical. The sergeant must organize resources quickly to achieve a successful end to the situation, with minimal or no injuries. Baltimore Police Department chose a training simulation because it provides a model of reality, a mock-up of a real situation without the danger. Multiple scenarios can be incorporated into the simulation, allowing the sergeants to practice the exact skills that they need when facing an actual hostage crisis.

The simulation begins by briefing the trainees on the hostage situation. Then they are directed to take charge of resolving the incident in the presence of an instructor who has personally been involved in similar real-life incidents. Each trainee supervises one difficult and one easy scenario. The simulation is designed to emphasize the importance of clear thinking and decision making in a situation in which time is critical. It is essential that the trainees take actions according to a set of priorities that place the greatest value on minimizing the risks to the hostages and isolating the suspects before communicating with them. The simulation scenarios include elements of many actual hostage incidents, such as forced entry, taking persons against their will, the presence of a weapon, and threats. As trainees work in the simulation, their actions are evaluated by the instructor. The instructor can either provide feedback to the trainees in writing after they complete the simulation or correct mistakes as they happen.

The training simulation mirrors the exact circumstances of actual hostage situations encountered by police officers. Also, the checklist of activities and behaviors that the sergeants are provided in training is the exact checklist used in hostage situations that occur on the street. Evidence of generalization is provided by police sergeants who have successfully dealt with a bank-hostage situation by using the skills emphasized in the simulation. The Baltimore Police Department is also concerned with maintenance. At the conclusion of the simulation, officers may be able to demonstrate how to free hostages successfully. However, the incidence of hostage situations is fairly low compared to other tasks that police officers perform (e.g., issuing traffic citations or investigating burglaries). As a result, the police department is concerned that officers may forget what they learned in training and therefore have difficulties in hostage situations. To ensure that officers have opportunities to practice these infrequently used but important skills, the training department occasionally schedules mock hostage situations.28

page 165 

Another application of the theory of identical elements is found in the use of simulators for training airline pilots. Pilots are trained in a simulator that looks exactly like the cockpit of a commercial aircraft. All aspects of the cockpit in the simulator (e.g., gauges, dials, and lights) are the same as in a real aircraft. In psychological terms, the learning environment has complete fidelity with the work environment. Fidelity refers to the extent to which the training environment is similar to the work environment. If skills in flying, taking off, landing, and dealing with emergency situations are learned in the simulator, they will be transferred to the work setting (commercial aircraft).

The identical elements approach also has been used to develop instruments that are designed to measure the similarity of jobs.29 Job similarity can be used as one measure of the extent to which training in the knowledge and skills required for one job prepares an employee to perform a different job.

The theory of identical elements has been applied to many training programs, particularly those that deal with the use of equipment or that involve specific procedures that must be learned. Identical elements theory is particularly relevant in making sure that near transfer occurs. Near transfer refers to trainees’ ability to apply learned capabilities exactly to the work situation.

Identical elements theory does not encourage transfer where the learning environment and the training environment are not necessarily identical. This situation arises particularly in interpersonal skills training. For example, a person’s behavior in a conflict situation is not easily predictable. Therefore, trainees must learn general principles of conflict resolution that they can apply to a wide variety of situations as circumstances dictate (e.g., an irate customer versus a customer who lacks product knowledge).

Stimulus Generalization Approach

The stimulus generalization approach suggests that transfer of training occurs when training emphasizes the most important features of a task or general principles that can be used to complete a task or solve a problem. It is important to identify the range of work situations in which these general principles can be applied. The stimulus generalization approach emphasizes far transfer. Far transfer refers to the trainee’s ability to apply learned capabilities to the work environment, even though the work environment (equipment, problems, and tasks) is not identical to that of the training session.

The stimulus generalization approach can be seen in the design of some skill training programs, which are based on social learning theory. Recall from the discussion of social learning theory that modeling, practice, feedback, and reinforcement play key roles in learning. One step in developing effective interpersonal skill training programs is to identify key behaviors that are needed to be successful in a situation. Key behaviors refer to a set of behaviors that can be used successfully in a wide variety of situations. In a training scenario, the model demonstrates these key behaviors in a video, and trainees have opportunities to practice them. The key behaviors are believed to be applicable to a wide variety of situations. In fact, the practice sessions in this type of training require the trainee to use the behaviors in a variety of situations that are not identical.

Cognitive Theory of Transfer

The cognitive theory of transfer is based on the information processing theory of learning discussed earlier in the chapter. Recall that storage and retrieval of information are key aspects of this model of learning. According to the cognitive theory of transfer, the likelihood of transfer is increased by providing trainees with meaningful material that enhances the chances that they will link what they encounter in the work environment to the learned capability. Also important is providing the trainee with cognitive strategies for coding the learned capabilities in memory so that they are easily retrievable.

page 166 

The influence of cognitive theory is seen in training design that encourages trainees, as part of the program, to consider potential applications of the training content to their jobs. Many training programs include having trainees identify a work problem or situation and discuss the potential application of training content.

The Learning Process

Now that you have reviewed the learning and transfer of training theories, you are ready to address three questions: What are the physical and mental processes involved in learning? How does learning and transfer occur? Do trainees have different learning styles?

Mental and Physical Processes

Table 4.4 shows the learning processes, including expectancy, perception, working storage, semantic encoding, long-term storage, retrieval, generalizing, and gratification.30 Table 4.4 emphasizes that learning depends on the learner’s cognitive processes, including attending to what is to be learned (learning content), organizing the learning content into a mental representation, and relating the learning content to existing knowledge from long-term memory.31 As noted earlier in this chapter, expectancy refers to the mental state that the learner brings to the instructional process. This includes factors such as readiness for training (motivation to learn, basic skills) as well as an understanding of the purpose of the instruction and the likely benefits that may result from learning and using the learned capabilities on the job. Perception refers to the ability to organize the message from the environment so that it can be processed and acted upon. Both working storage and semantic encoding relate to short-term memory. In working storage, rehearsal and repetition of information occur, allowing material to be coded for memory. Working storage is limited by the amount of material that can be processed at any one time. Research suggests that not more than five messages can be prepared for storage at the same time.

TABLE 4.4 The Relationship Among Learning Processes, Instructional Events, and Forms of Instruction

Processes of

Learning External Instructional Events Forms of Instruction

Expectancy Informing the learner of the lesson objective

Demonstrate the expected performance.

Indicate the kind of verbal question to be answered.

Perception Presenting stimuli with distinctive features

Emphasize the features of the subject to be perceived.

Use formatting and figures in text to emphasize features.

Working storage Limiting the amount to be learned

Arrange lengthier material in chunks.

Provide a visual image of material to be learned.

Provide practice and overlearning to aid the attainment of automaticity.

Semantic encoding Providing learning guidance

Provide verbal cues to the proper combining sequence.

Provide verbal links to a larger meaningful context.

Use diagrams and models to show relationships among concepts.

page 167

Long-term storage Elaborating the amount to be learned

Vary the context and setting for presentation and recall of material.

Relate newly learned material to previously learned information.

Provide a variety of contexts and situations during practice.

Retrieval Providing cues that are used in recall

Suggest cues that elicit the recall of material.

Use familiar sounds or rhymes as cues.

Generalizing Enhancing retention and learning transfer

Design the learning situation to share elements with the situation to which learning applies.

Provide verbal links to additional complexes of information.

Gratifying Providing feedback about performance correctness

Provide feedback on degree of accuracy and timing of performance.

Confirm whether original expectancies were met.

Sources: Based on K. Kraiger and J. Ford, “The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 8 (2021): 45–72; M. Cole, The Science of Learning (Alexandria: VA: Association for Talent Development, 2017); R. Gagne, “Learning Processes and Instruction,” Training Research Journal 1 (1995/96), pp. 17–28; D. Rock, “Your Brain on Learning,” Chief Learning Officer, May 2015, pp. 30–48; A. Beninghof, “Pathways to Retention,” T+D, June 2015, pp. 21–22; M. Torrance, “Nine Moments of Learning,” T+D, September 2014, pp. 76–77.

Semantic encoding refers to the actual coding process of incoming messages. Different learning strategies influence how training content is coded. Learning strategies include rehearsal, organizing, and elaboration.32 Rehearsal, the simplest learning strategy, focuses on learning through repetition (memorization). Organizing requires the learner to find similarities and themes in the training material. Elaboration requires the trainee to relate the training material to other, more familiar knowledge, skills, or behaviors. Trainees use a combination of these strategies to learn. The “best” strategy depends on the learning outcome. For knowledge outcomes, rehearsal and organization are most appropriate. For skill application, elaboration is necessary. After messages have been attended to, rehearsed, and coded, they are ready for storage in long-term memory.

To use learned material (e.g., cognitive skills or verbal information), it must be retrieved. Retrieval involves identifying learned material in long-term memory and using it to influence performance. An important part of the learning process is not only being able to reproduce exactly what was learned, but also being able to adapt the learning for use in similar but not identical situations. This is known as generalizing. Finally, gratifying refers to the feedback that the learner receives as a result of using learning content. Feedback is necessary to allow the learner to adapt responses so they are more appropriate. Feedback also provides information about the incentives or reinforcers that may result from performance.

Learning Cycles and Styles

Several models of learning styles have been proposed. Some suggest that trainees will learn best if instruction matches how they like to learn (e.g., visual, through movement, hearing). Others suggest that learning involves stages or cycles. Trainees tend to overemphasize one stage or another, and to become effective learners, they need to develop strengths in each of the stages. For example, one model suggests learning involves page 168four stages: concrete experience (e.g., encountering a work problem), reflection (thinking about the problem), abstract conceptualization (generating ideas how to solve the problem), and active experimentation (implementing the ideas).33 Implementing the ideas provides feedback as to their effectiveness so the learner can see the results and start the learning process over again. Conventional wisdom suggests that instruction needs to match the trainees’ learning style or force them to engage in all stages. In fact, there is little to no evidence supporting that matching instruction to trainees’ learning style enhances learning and transfer of training.34 Rather, well-designed instruction (discussed next) benefits all trainees.

Implications of the Learning Process and Transfer of Training for Instruction

Instruction refers to the trainer’s manipulation of the environment in order to help trainees learn.35 Returning to Table 4.4, the right side of this table shows the forms of instruction that support learning. To provide trainees with the best chance to learn, it is important to ensure that these forms of instruction are included in training. Table 4.5 summarizes the features of good instruction that facilitate the learning process. The features of a positive learning environment and transfer of training need to be designed into training courses, programs, or specific training methods that might be used, whether in the form of lectures, e-learning, or on-the-job training. The influence of different training methods alone on learning and transfer is less important than including the features shown in Table 4.5 in whatever method is used. Here, as well as later in the chapter, we discuss these features.

TABLE 4.5 Features of Instruction and the Work Environment That Facilitate Learning and Transfer of Training

Objectives

Meaningful content

Opportunities to practice

Methods for committing training content to memory

Feedback

Observation, experience, and social interaction

Proper coordination and arrangement of the training program

Encourage trainee responsibility and self-management

Ensure that the work environment supports learning and transfer

Employees Need to Know the Objectives

Employees learn best when they understand the objective of the training program. The objective refers to the purpose and expected outcome of training activities. There may be objectives for each training session, as well as overall objectives for the program. Keep in mind that training objectives are the last step of the process that begins with business goals.36 Business goals influence the expected performance of roles or positions, and in turn, the tasks that need to be completed. Training objectives focus on the behavior, knowledge, or skills needed to complete the tasks.

Recall the discussion of goal setting theory earlier in the chapter. Because objectives can serve as goals, trainees need to understand, accept, and be committed to achieving the training objectives for learning to occur. Training objectives based on the training needs analysis help employees understand why they need training and what they need to learn. Objectives are also useful for identifying the types of training outcomes that should be measured to evaluate a training program’s effectiveness.

page 169 

A training objective has three components:37

A statement of what the employee is expected to do (performance or outcome).

A statement of the quality or level of performance that is acceptable (criterion).

A statement of the conditions under which the trainee is expected to perform the desired outcome (conditions).

The objective should not describe performance that cannot be observed, such as “understand” or “know.” Table 4.6 shows verbs that can be used for cognitive, affective, and psychomotor (physical abilities and skills) outcomes. For example, a training objective for a customer-service training program for retail salespeople might be “After training, the employee will be able to express concern [performance] to all irate customers by offering a brief, sincere (fewer than 10-word) apology, in a professional manner [criteria], no matter how upset the customer is [conditions].” Table 4.7 shows the characteristics of good training objectives.

TABLE 4.6 Examples of Performance or Outcomes for Objectives

Domain Performance

Knowledge (recall of information) Arrange, define, label, list, recall, repeat

Comprehension (interpret in own words) Classify, discuss, explain, review, translate

Application (apply to new situation) Apply, choose, demonstrate, illustrate, prepare

Analysis (break down into parts and show relationships) Analyze, categorize, compare, diagram, test

Synthesis (bring together to form a whole) Arrange, collect, assemble, propose, set up

Evaluation (judgments based on criteria) Appraise, attack, argue, choose, compare

Receiving (pay attention) Listen to, perceive, be alert to

Responding (minimal participation) Reply, answer, approve, obey

Valuing (preferences) Attain, assume, support, participate

Organization (development of values) Judge, decide, identify with, select

Characterization (total philosophy of life) Believe, practice, carry out

Reflexes (involuntary movement) Stiffen, extend, flex

Fundamental movements (simple movements) Crawl, walk, run, reach

Perception (response to stimuli) Turn, bend, balance, crawl

Physical abilities (psychomotor movements) Move heavy objects; make quick motions

Skilled movements (advanced learned movements) Play an instrument; use a hand tool

Sources: Based on H. Sredl and W. Rothwell, “Setting Instructional Objectives,” in The ASTD Reference Guide to Professional Training Roles and Competencies, Vol. II (New York: Random House, 1987), Chapter 16; R. Mager, Preparing Instructional Objectives, 3d ed. (Atlanta: Center for Effective Performance, 1997).

TABLE 4.7 Characteristics of Good Training Objectives

Provide a clear idea of what the trainee is expected to be able to do at the end of training.

Include standards of performance that can be measured or evaluated.

State the specific resources (e.g., tools and equipment) that the trainee needs to perform the action or behavior specified.

Describe the conditions under which performance of the objective is expected to occur (e.g., the physical work environment, such as at night or in high temperatures; mental stresses, such as angry customers; or equipment failure, such as malfunctioning computer equipment).

Some of the most common problems with objectives include that they are unclear, incomplete, or unspecific.38 Table 4.8 provides some examples of learning objectives. As you review each objective, identify if it includes each of the three components (performance, criteria, condition). Are these good objectives? How can they be improved?

page 170 

TABLE 4.8 Examples of Learning Objectives

Develop a diverse multifunctional team that can compete in a challenging environment to produce outcomes that will enhance results.

Use conflict management skills when faced with a conflict.

Smile at all customers, even when exhausted, unless the customer is irate.

Reduce product defects from 10 to 7 percent.

List all of the nodes of a DC-3 multi-switch correctly, without using a reference manual.

Use the software 100 percent accurately, given access to the quick reference guide.

Employees Need Meaningful Training Content

Employees are most likely to learn when the training is linked to their current job experiences and tasks—that is, when it is meaningful to them.39 To enhance the meaningfulness of training content, the message should be presented using concepts, terms, and examples familiar to trainees. Also, the training context should mirror the work environment. The training context refers to the physical, intellectual, and emotional environment in which training occurs. For example, in a retail salesperson customer-service program, the meaningfulness of the material will be increased by using scenarios of unhappy customers actually encountered by salespersons in stores. Some useful techniques for convincing trainees that the training program content is meaningful include:40

Telling stories about others’ success in applying training content, especially former trainees.

Relating training content to what trainees already know about their jobs.

Showing how training relates to company goals and strategy.

Showing how trainees can use training content ideas at work.

Discussing examples or cases that remind trainees of the good and poor work they have seen.

Repeating the application of ideas in different contexts.

Presenting evidence that what they will learn during training is what high-performing employees use in their jobs.

Showing how the conditions that trainees face in training are similar to those on the job.

Providing practice or application activities that can be used on the job.

Providing hard copies or electronic access to well-organized materials so trainees can refer to them on the job or use them to teach others.

Allowing trainees to choose their practice strategy and how they want training content presented (e.g., verbally, visually, problem-based, or using a combination of approaches).

Provoking trainees’ emotions using real-world stories and situations related to the content that trainees can identify with.

page 171 

Employees Need Opportunities to Practice

Practice refers to the physical or mental rehearsal of a task, knowledge, or skill to achieve proficiency in performing the task or skill or demonstrating the knowledge. Practice involves having the employee demonstrate the learned capability (e.g., cognitive strategy, verbal information) emphasized in the training objectives under conditions and performance standards specified by the objectives. For practice to be effective, it needs to involve the trainee actively, include overlearning (repeated practice), take the appropriate amount of time, and include the appropriate unit of learning (amount of material). Practice also needs to be relevant to the training objectives. It is best to include a combination of examples and practice, rather than all practice.41 This helps avoid overloading trainees’ memory so they can engage in the cognitive processes needed for learning to occur (selecting, organizing, and integrating content). Viewing examples helps learners develop a new mental model of skills, which they can then use in practice. Some examples of ways to practice include case studies, simulations, role play, games, and oral and written questions.

Pre-Practice Conditions

Trainers need to focus not just on training content, but also on how to enable trainees to process information in a way that will facilitate learning and the use of training on the job. There are several steps that trainers can take within the training course prior to practice to enhance trainees’ motivation to learn and to facilitate retention of training content. Before practice, trainers can42

Provide information about the process or strategy that will result in the greatest learning. For example, let trainees in a customer service class know about the types of calls they will receive (irate customer, request for information on a product, challenge of a bill), how to recognize such calls, and how to complete the calls.

Encourage trainees to develop a strategy (metacognition) to reflect on their own learning process. Metacognition refers to an individual’s control over his or her own thoughts and learning process. Two ways that individuals engage in metacognition are monitoring and control.43 Research shows that metacognition, including self-regulation, promotes learning.44 Self-regulation refers to learners’ involvement with the training material and assessing their progress toward learning. Learners who engage in self-regulation likely learn more effectively because they are able to monitor their progress, identify areas needing improvement, and adjust their learning. Self-regulation may be especially important for online training courses, in which learners have control over the learning experience such that they can decide to drop out of courses and decide how much effort, if any, they want to exert to learn the training content. Table 4.9 provides examples of questions that trainers can encourage trainees to answer to help encourage metacognition and self-regulation. Trainers (and online learning designers) can also aid metacognition by asking trainees to summarize the key points after a topic is completed; consider how to deal with factors on the job that might inhibit application of learning content; and develop quiz questions and answers and ask other trainees to answer them.45

Provide advance organizers—outlines, texts, diagrams, and graphs that help trainees organize the information that will be presented and practiced.

Help trainees set challenging mastery or learning goals.

Create realistic expectations for trainees by communicating what will occur in training.

When training employees in teams, communicate performance expectations and clarify the roles and responsibilities of team members.

Help trainees in the early phases of instruction alleviate their anxiety and increase their focus.

Start training with the simple aspects of the task (knowledge, skill, behavior) and gradually build in complexity and difficulty.

page 172 

TABLE 4.9 Examples of Questions That Encourage Self-Regulation

Am I concentrating on the training material?

Do I understand the key points?

Am I setting goals to help me remember the material after I finish the course?

Are the study tactics I have been using effective for learning the training material?

Would I do better on the test if I studied more?

Have I spent enough time reviewing to remember the information after I finish the course?

What additional help and resources do I need?

What do I need to remember? How will I remember?

Sources: From P. Shank, “Self-Sufficient Learners Make Successful Workers,” T+D, April 2017, pp. 43–46; T. Sitzmann, “Self-Regulating Online Course Engagement,” T+D, March 2010, p. 26.

Practice Involves Experience

Learning will not occur if employees practice only by talking about what they are expected to do. For example, using the objective for the customer service course previously discussed, practice would involve having trainees participate in role-playing with unhappy customers (customers upset with poor service, poor merchandise, or unsatisfactory exchange policies). Training should involve an active learning approach in which trainees must explore and experiment to determine the rules, principles, and strategies for effective performance.46 To maximize retention and transfer, trainees should have the opportunities to apply skills across different tasks, people, and situations that occur on the job. Practice should start with the easier aspect of a task, problem, or skill and increase in difficulty as mastery is demonstrated. Trainees need to continue to practice even if they have been able to perform the objective several times (known as overlearning). Over-learning helps the trainee become more comfortable using new knowledge and skills and increases the length of time the trainee will retain the knowledge, skill, or behavior. For example, customer service representatives in Verizon’s video training program were asked to watch multiple scenarios of interactions with customers, record their responses using a smartphone or webcam, and submit the video to their assigned coach. The coach provided feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of the representatives’ responses. The representatives could record a new response after they received feedback from the coach. Verizon found that the recording and feedback process encouraged employees to practice multiple times. This repeated practice resulted in improved customer service skills.47

Conventional wisdom is that we all learn the most from our errors. However, most people feel that errors are frustrating and lead to anger and despair. Research suggests that from a training perspective, errors can be useful.48 Error management training refers to giving trainees opportunities to make errors during training. In error management training, trainees are instructed that errors can help learning, and they are encouraged to make errors and learn from them. Trainees may actually commit more errors and may take longer to complete training that incorporates error management training. However, error management training helps improve employee use of learned skills on the job (i.e., transfer of training).

Error management training is effective because it provides the opportunity for trainees to engage in metacognition; that is, it allows them to plan how to use training content, to monitor the use of training content, and to evaluate how training content was used. This results in a deeper level of cognitive processing, leading to better memory and recall of training. Trainers should consider using error management training in the training program along with traditional approaches by giving trainees the opportunity to make errors when they work alone on difficult problems and tasks and encouraging them to use errors as a way to learn.

It is important to note that allowing trainees simply to make errors does not help improve learning. For errors to have a positive influence on learning, trainees need to be taught to use errors as a chance to learn. Error page 173management training may be particularly useful whenever the training content to be learned cannot be completely covered during a training session. As a result, trainees have to discover on their own what to do when confronted with new tasks or problems.

Massed versus Spaced Practice

The frequency of practice has been shown to influence learning, depending on the type of task being trained.49 Massed practice conditions are those in which individuals practice a task continuously, without resting. Massed practice also involves having trainees complete practice exercises at one time within a lesson or class rather than distributing the exercises within the lesson. In spaced practice conditions, individuals are given rest intervals within practice sessions. Spaced practice is superior to massed practice in general. However, the difference in effectiveness of massed versus spaced practice varies by the characteristics of the task. Task characteristics include overall task complexity, mental requirements, and physical requirements. Overall task complexity refers to the degree to which a task requires a number of distinct behaviors, the number of choices involved in performing the task, and the degree of uncertainty in performing the task. Mental requirements refers to the degree to which the task requires the subject to use or demonstrate mental skills or cognitive skills or abilities to perform the task. Physical requirements refers to the degree to which the task requires the person to use or demonstrate physical skills and abilities to perform and complete the task. Table 4.10 shows how tasks can differ.

TABLE 4.10 Mental and Physical Requirements and Overall Complexity for Tasks

Mental Requirements Overall Complexity Physical Requirements

Low Low High

Task Examples: Rotary pursuit, typing, ball toss, ladder climb, peg reversal, bilateral transfer, crank turning

High Average Low

Task Examples: Free recall task, video games, foreign language, slide-bar task, voice recognition, classroom lecture, sound localization, word processing, stoop task, verbal discrimination, maze learning, connecting numbers, upside-down alphabet printing, distance learning, web training

Low High High

Task Examples: Gymnastic skills, balancing task

High High High

Task Examples: Air traffic controller simulation, milk pasteurization simulation, airplane control simulation, hand movement memorization, puzzle box task, music memorization and performance

Source: J. Donovan and D. Radosevich, “A Meta-Analytic Review of the Distribution of Practice Effect: Now You See It, Now You Don’t,” Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (1999), pp. 795–805.

For more complex tasks (including those that are representative of training settings, such as web-based instruction, lecture, and distance learning), relatively long rest periods appear to be beneficial for task learning. After practice, trainees need specific feedback to enhance learning. This includes feedback from the task or job itself, as well as feedback from trainers, managers, and peers.

Whole versus Part Practice

A final issue related to practice is how much of the training should be practiced at one time. One option is that all tasks or objectives should be practiced at the same time (whole practice). Another option is that each objective or task should be practiced individually as soon as it is introduced in the training program page 174(part practice). It is probably best to employ both whole and part practice in a training session. Trainees should have the opportunity to practice individual skills or behaviors. If the skills or behaviors introduced in training are related to one another, the trainee should demonstrate all of them in a practice session after they have been practiced individually. Practice activities should expose trainees to a variety of training content by switching between topics throughout the session. This helps facilitate learning because it helps ensure that content is retained in trainees’ long-term memory. Transfer of training is also enhanced because trainees are being asked to recall and apply skills and knowledge in the same way they work (i.e., using different knowledge and skills as they shift their focus between different tasks and problems).

Effective Practice Conditions

For practice to be relevant to the training objectives, several conditions must be met.50 Practice must involve the actions emphasized in the training objectives; be completed under the conditions specified in the training objectives; help trainees perform to meet the criteria or standard that was set; provide some means to evaluate the extent to which trainees’ performance meets the standards; and allow trainees to correct their mistakes.

Practice must be related to the training objectives. The trainer should identify what trainees will be doing when practicing the objectives (performance), the criteria for attainment of the objective, and the conditions under which they may perform. These conditions should be present in the practice session. Practice activities should be as realistic as possible. That is, trainees should be involved in practice that mirrors how they will be asked to use the training content on the job. Next, the trainer needs to consider the adequacy of the trainees’ performance. That is, how will trainees know whether their performance meets performance standards? Will they see a model of desired performance? Will they be provided with a checklist or description of desired performance? Can the trainees decide if their performance meets standards, or will the trainer or a piece of equipment compare their performance with standards?

Finally, in the event that trainees’ performance does not meet standards, the trainer must decide whether trainees will be able to understand what is wrong and how to fix it. That is, trainers need to consider whether trainees will be able to diagnose their performance and take corrective action, or if they will need help from the trainer or a fellow trainee.

Employees Need to Commit Training Content to Memory

Memory works by processing stimuli we perceive through our senses into short-term memory. If the information is determined to be “important,” it moves to long-term memory, where new interconnections are made between neurons or electrical connections in the brain. Research shows there are several ways to help trainees commit content to memory (see Table 4.11).51

TABLE 4.11 How to Help Trainees Commit Training Content to Memory

Help them understand how they learn

Emphasize important points and eliminate irrelevant content

Use a concept map to show relationships among ideas

Teach key words; provide a procedure, sequence, or visual image

Encourage trainees to take notes and engage in reflection

Have trainees engage in overlearning

Provide rest breaks during training

Use quizzes or boosters

Break courses into small chunks of learning using modules or microlearning

Have trainees complete pretraining work

Present and explain related knowledge, principles, and ideas close in time

Sources: Based on K. Kraiger and J. Ford, “The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 8 (2021), pp. 45–72; K. Kraiger and V. Mattingly, “Cognitive and Neural Foundations of Learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Training and Employee Development, K. Brown, ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018);

“The Art & Science of Learning That Sticks,” from www.grovo.com, accessed February 9, 2018; D. Rock, “Your Brain on Learning,” Chief Learning Officer, May 2015, pp. 30–48; A. Beninghof, “Pathways to Retention,” T+D, June 2015, pp. 21–22; R. Weiss, “Memory and Learning,” Training and Development, October 2000, pp. 46–50; R. Zemke, “Toward a Science of Training,” training, July 1999, pp. 32–36.

One way is to make trainees aware of how they are creating, processing, and accessing memory. It is important for trainees to understand how they learn.

Important points should be highlighted and irrelevant content eliminated to help trainees maximize the use of their cognitive resources for remembering what’s important. Visuals such as graphs and videos can be especially useful in providing the learner with relevant, important content.

To create long-term memory, training programs must be explicit on content and elaborate on details. One approach that trainers use is to create a concept map to show relationships among ideas. Another is to use multiple forms of review including writing, drawings, and role play to access memory through multiple methods. Teaching key words, a procedure, or a sequence, or providing a visual image gives trainees another way to retrieve information. Reminding trainees of knowledge, behavior, and skills that they already know that page 175are relevant to the current training content creates a link to long-term memory that provides a framework for recalling the new training content. External retrieval cues can also be useful. Consider a time when you misplaced your keys or wallet. In trying to remember, we often review all the information we can recall that was close in time to the event or that preceded the loss. We often go to the place where we were when we last saw the item because the environment can provide cues that aid in recall.

Like other teams in the National Football League, the Cleveland Browns players have notebook computers to learn plays, schemes, and prepare for opponents by watching videos and taking notes.52 However, the Browns coaches also believe that players can’t just watch videos, they need to actively learn. So coaches are encouraging players not just to type on their notebooks but to write things down using pencil and paper. The idea is to get the players to mentally process what they are supposed to be learning, which helps commit that learning to memory. Taking notes by writing rather than typing causes the learner to rephrase ideas in their own words, which means they must process the information at a deeper level in the brain. Another way to help employees commit what they learn to memory involves reflection. Reflection involves having trainees spend a short amount of time, such as 15 minutes, reviewing and writing about what they learned and how they performed.53 Rest breaks are necessary to help trainees optimize their focus and attention on training content. Without rest breaks memory becomes overloaded, which makes it difficult for trainees to retain content in long-term memory. Finally, quizzes and tests enhance learning by requiring the trainee to retrieve information from memory. This helps ensure that the training content will be retained over a longer period of time.

Long-term memory is also enhanced by going beyond one-trial learning. One-trial learning refers to the first time trainees correctly demonstrate a behavior or skill or correctly recall knowledge. It is often assumed that they have learned the behavior, knowledge, or skill at this point but this is not always true. To retain the knowledge, skill, and behavior or other training content, trainees need to engage in overlearning. As discussed earlier, overlearning refers to reviewing and practicing multiple times to help ensure training content is stored in long-term memory. Overlearning also helps autonomize a task. Automatization refers to making performance of a task, recall of knowledge, or demonstration of a skill so automatic that it requires little thought page 176or attention. Automatization also helps reduce memory demands. The more that automatization occurs, the more that memory is freed up to concentrate on other learning and thinking. The more active a trainee is in rehearsal and practice, the greater the amount of information retained in long-term memory and the less memory decay over time. For example, opportunities for learners to retrieve what they have learned can also increase retention.54 Boosters refer to retrieval opportunities that can help the learner’s brain consider training information as important and help retain it. Boosters can include short multiple-choice questions, short-answer quizzes, or other activities that require learners to retrieve what they have learned from long-term memory.

Research suggests that no more than four or five items can be attended to at one time. If a lengthy process or procedure is to be taught, instruction needs to be delivered in relatively small chunks or short sessions in order to not exceed memory limits.55 Rather than requiring employees to take the time to go through an entire course that may include information that is not helpful or needed, courses are being modularized or broken down into small chunks of learning.56 Learners can skip content they are not interested in or can demonstrate mastery by completing tests. Chunking courses allows employees to save time and money by focusing on topics that they need for their job or want to learn.

Microlearning refers to training delivered in small pieces or chunks designed to engage trainees, motivate them to learn, and help facilitate retention.57 The chunks of learning are presented using videos or games that are typically 5–8 minutes long. Microlearning is used to replace longer training courses with one or several short courses. It is also being used to reinforce or supplement formal training (e.g., sending quizzes after training, sharing short pieces of training content before the program to generate excitement) and to create just-in-time learning content. Survey results of talent professionals provide important insights into the use of microlearning.58 Microlearning is most frequently delivered using videos, self-pace e-learning, or visuals such as PowerPoint slides or infographics. Quizzes, learners responding to scenarios, simulations, hands-on activities, or games tend to be used in microlearning. Microlearning is being used to replace longer courses that include technical content, focus on performance support or onboarding, or are considered mandatory and must be completed to meet compliance standards. Talent professionals report that the primary benefits of microlearning for learners focus on time; that is, learners can access learning when it is convenient for them, learning does not take a lot of time, and learners can access learning on-the-job when they need it. Also, trainees’ progress in games or simulations can be tracked and reported, and microlearning content can be linked together based on topics or skills. The primary barrier for effective microlearning is that trainees are not held accountable for learning.

Consider how several different companies use microlearning.59 Trainees at Avenade, a management consulting company, have access to minicourses that include topics like design thinking and leading the self. The courses are organized into either a progressive series or as pathways in which courses of related content can be taken in any order. All of the minicourses include learner guides, activities, reflection prompts, and an interactive discussion board. Trainees’ reactions to the minicourses have been positive. They report that the minicourses allow them to fit learning into their busy schedules. CDK Global, a provider of computing services to automobile dealers, uses microlearning to support the performance of its sales team. Sales team members can access short podcasts while driving to visit their clients and make their own playlists based on the issues and situations they will encounter with their clients. American Dairy Queen uses microlearning for introducing new products and showing the ingredients and steps in the recipe. Trainees complete microlearning and then are able to review it before practicing making the product. USSI, a cleaning contract company, has many employees for whom English is not their first language. Training is delivered in 5-minute microlearning sessions, sometimes while employees are signing in to the company’s time system. Some of the five-minute lessons cover English vocabulary, such as common phrases employees may need if they encounter an office tenant. In addition, USSI gives supervisors quick lessons in soft skills, such as handling difficult behavior.

page 177 

If you are designing a new training course or program—or modifying an existing one—and you don’t have the time or resources to apply all of the principles of microlearning, you can still help avoid overwhelming trainees with complex material during training by providing them with pretraining work that can be completed online or using workbooks.60 For example, trainees can become familiar with the “basics” such as names, definitions, principles, and characteristics of components before they are trained in how the principles are applied (e.g., dealing with angry customers) or how a process works (e.g., testing for pathogens in a blood sample, changing a car’s water pump). This will help free up cognitive resources so they can focus on and retain content covered during training.

Employees Need Feedback

Feedback is information about how well people are meeting the training objectives. To be effective, feedback should focus on specific behaviors and be provided as soon as possible after the trainee performs the behavior.61 Also, positive trainee behavior should be verbally praised or reinforced. Videotape is a powerful tool for giving feedback. Trainers should view the videotape with trainees, provide specific information about how behaviors need to be modified, and praise trainee behaviors that meet objectives. Feedback can also come from tests and quizzes, on-the-job observation, performance data, a mentor or coach, written communications, or interpersonal interactions.

The specificity of the level of feedback provided to trainees needs to vary if trainees are expected to understand what leads to poor performance as well as good performance.62 For example, employees may need to learn how to respond when equipment is malfunctioning as well as when it is working properly; therefore, feedback provided during training should not be so specific that it leads only to employee knowledge about equipment that is working properly. Less specific feedback can cause trainees to make errors that lead to equipment problems, providing trainees with opportunities to learn which behaviors lead to equipment problems and how to fix those problems. Difficulties encountered during practice as a result of errors or reduced frequency of feedback can help trainees engage more in exploration and information processing to identify correct responses.

Employees Learn through Observation, Experience, and Interaction

As mentioned earlier in the chapter, one way employees learn is through observing and imitating the actions of models. For the model to be effective, the desired behaviors or skills need to be clearly specified and the model should have characteristics (e.g., age or position) similar to the target audience.63 After observing the model, trainees should have the opportunity in practice sessions to reproduce the skills or behavior shown by the model. According to adult learning theory, employees also learn best when they learn by doing,64 which involves giving employees hands-on experiences or putting them with more experienced employees and providing them with the tools and materials needed to manage their knowledge gaps. One way to model behavior or skills is to show learners what to do using YouTube videos. For example, the Cheesecake Factory has videos of outstanding servers at work available at its Video café.65

Employees also learn best through interaction—interacting with training content, with other learners, and with the trainer or instructor.66 Table 4.12 shows the three ways that employees learn through interaction and when to use them. Learner-content interaction means that the learner interacts with the training content. Learner-content interaction includes reading text on the web or in books, listening to multimedia modules, performing activities that require the manipulation of tools or objects (such as writing), completing case studies and worksheets, or creating new content based on learned information. Traditionally, all of the training content that employees needed came from trainers and the training and development department during formally scheduled courses. Today, one of the trends is for training content to include learner-generated content page 178and to be available when trainees need it.67 One example of learner-generated content are videos of work practices and processes captured on smartphones that can be shared with peers. Having trainees engage with the learning content helps build a mental model in memory that they can recall in the future. If trainees have difficulty, trainers should help them find where they can get the solution or answer so they are actively working on the problem.

TABLE 4.12 Three Types of Instructional Interaction

Type When to Use

Learner-content Requires mastering a task that is completed alone. Learn process of studying information and acting on it.

Learner-learner Requires mastering a task that is completed in a group. Learners gain new knowledge or validate their understanding by discussing content with peers.

Learner-instructor Best for in-depth topic exploration and to develop strengths in critical analysis and thinking. Discussion may be limited when large amounts of material need to be presented in a short timespan.

Sources: Based on J. Halls, “Move Beyond Words to Experience,” T+D, February 2019, pp. 69–72; H. Nuriddin, “Building the Right Interaction,” T+D, March 2010, pp. 32–35; D. Leonard and W. Swap, “Deep Smarts,” Harvard Business Review, September 2004, pp. 88–97.

Learner-instructor interaction refers to interaction between the learner and the expert (trainer). Trainers can facilitate learning by presenting, demonstrating, and reinforcing content. Also, trainers provide support, encouragement, and feedback that are valued by most learners. Learner-instructor discussions can be useful for helping learners understand content, enhance their self-awareness and self-assessment, gain an appreciation for different opinions, and implement ideas on the job. To maximize learners’ critical thinking and analysis skills, discussion should go beyond instructors asking questions and learners providing answers. Asking trainees to respond to and ask questions gets them to engage with the content and use prior knowledge, helping them create meaning from the experience and facilitates retention.68 Using questions also helps the instructor gauge trainees’ level of understanding or lack of confidence in a topic.

Learner-learner interaction refers to interaction between learners, with or without an instructor. Learner-learner interaction, including observing and sharing experiences with peers, may be especially useful for training interpersonal skills (such as communications), acquiring personal knowledge based on experience (such as tacit knowledge about how to close a sale or resolve a conflict), providing context-specific knowledge (such as managing in an international location), and learning to cope with uncertainty or new situations (such as marketing a new product or service).69

Consider how training at Farmers Insurance and General Motors gets learners actively involved and helps ensure transfer of training.70 Farmers’s “CE—It’s Up to Me” training includes four online modules and short two-minute videos with supporting worksheets that allow employees to observe actual customer interactions, identify their impact on the interaction, and determine how they can improve the experience. Managers hold team meetings to discuss the training after trainees complete both the online modules and the short videos. At General Motors, district manager training includes face-to-face instruction; experiences in dealer operations, customer call centers, and after-sales centers; self-directed training; mentoring from more experienced district managers; and opportunities to share what they have learned with other trainees.

The type of instructional interaction should vary depending on the learning objectives.71 For example, relying heavily on learner-instructor interaction may be best when training content must be provided to trainees in a required form such as training to comply with policies. Using both learner-instructor and learner-content interaction should be considered when teaching skills to inexperienced trainees, especially when the skills page 179need to be performed in a specific order. This combination should be considered for learning manufacturing processes, basic customer service skills, performance management, basic sales skills, or software skills. This involves gaining the trainees’ attention, teaching the skill, demonstrating it, having trainees practicing the skills, and then assessing the trainees’ mastery level. All three types of instructional interaction shown in Table 4.12 are appropriate if the purpose is to have trainees learn how to solve a problem they may encounter on-the-job that can have several possible solutions such as in making management decisions or advanced troubleshooting skills for servicing complex products. Trainees discover potential solutions by experiencing them. Trainers take on the role of facilitators and lead debriefings. Trainees share their solutions with each other. The trainer identifies the best solution and explains why that response is correct and the other responses are not.

Communities of practice (COPs) refers to groups of employees who work together, learn from each other, and develop a common understanding of how to get work accomplished.72 COPs can involve face-to-face or electronic interaction. The idea of COPs suggests that learning occurs on the job as a result of social interaction. Every company has naturally occurring COPs that arise as a result of relationships that employees develop to accomplish work, and as a result of the design of the work environment. Leading Real Estate Companies of the World (LeadingRE) provides “CEO Exchange Groups,” groups of principal and managing brokers of real estate companies who do not compete with each other.73 They meet face-to-face or on conference calls several times each year to discuss challenges and opportunities they are facing and share best practices.

COPs also take the form of social networks, discussion boards, list servers, or other forms of computer-mediated communication in which employees communicate electronically. In doing so, each employee’s knowledge can be accessed in a relatively quick manner. It is as if employees are having a conversation with a group of experts. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals has 11 COPs that focus on maintaining shop floor excellence.74 The COPs make it easy for employees to share best practices, learn from one another, and improve business processes. The maintenance function used its COP to deliver more than 600 hours of training on new technology and maintenance processes. This has resulted in more reliable equipment and higher productivity, such as increasing equipment use in one manufacturing plant from 72 to 92 percent.

COPs are most effective for learning and improving work performance when managers and employees believe they contribute to the core operating processes of the company, such as engineering or quality.75 Despite the benefits of improved communication, a drawback to these communities is that participation is often voluntary, so some employees may not share their knowledge unless the organizational culture supports participation. That is, employees may be reluctant to participate without an incentive or may be fearful that if they share their knowledge with others, they will give away their personal advantage in salary and promotion decisions.76 Another potential drawback is information overload. Employees may receive so much information that they fail to process it, which may cause them to withdraw from the COP.

Employees Need the Training Program to Be Properly Coordinated and Arranged

Training coordination is one of several aspects of training administration. Training administration refers to coordinating activities before, during, and after the program.77 Training administration involves:

Communicating courses and programs to employees.

Enrolling employees in courses and programs.

Preparing and processing any pretraining materials, such as readings or tests.

Preparing materials that will be used in instruction (e.g., copies of overheads, cases).

Arranging for the training facility and room.

Testing equipment that will be used in instruction.

page 180Having backup equipment (e.g., paper copies of slides or an extra overhead projector bulb) should equipment fail.

Providing support during instruction.

Distributing evaluation materials (e.g., tests, reaction measures, surveys).

Facilitating communications between the trainer and trainees during and after training (e.g., coordinating exchange of e-mail addresses).

Recording course completion in the trainees’ training records or personnel files.

Good coordination ensures that trainees are not distracted by events (such as an uncomfortable room or poorly organized materials) that could interfere with learning. Activities before the program include communicating to trainees the purpose of the program, its location, the name of a person to contact if they have questions, and any preprogram work they are supposed to complete. Books, speakers, handouts, and videotapes need to be prepared. Any necessary arrangements to secure rooms and equipment (such as virtual reality headsets) should be made. The physical arrangement of the training room should complement the training technique. For example, a team-building session will be less than effective if the seats cannot be moved for group activities. If visual aids will be used, all trainees should be able to see them. Make sure that the room is physically comfortable, with adequate lighting and ventilation. Trainees should be informed of starting and finishing times, break times, and the location of bathrooms. Distractions such as phone messages should be minimized, and trainees should be advised to turn off their cell phones and pagers. If trainees will be asked to evaluate the program or take tests to determine what they have learned, allot time for this activity at the end of the program. Following the program, the names of trainees who have completed the program should be recorded and credit given (if appropriate). Handouts and other training materials should be stored or returned to the consultant. The end of the program is also a good time to consider how the program could be improved if it will be offered again. Practical issues in selecting and preparing a training site and designing a program are discussed in more detail in Chapter Five.

Encourage Trainee Responsibility and Self-Management

Trainees need to take responsibility for learning and transfer,78 which includes preparing for training, being involved and engaged during training, and using training content back on the job. Before training, trainees need to consider why they are attending training and set specific learning goals (either alone or, preferably, in a discussion with their manager) as part of completing an action plan (action plans are discussed in detail in Chapter Five). Also, trainees need to complete any pretraining assignments. During training, trainees need to be involved. That is, they need to participate and share experiences in discussions, to practice, and to ask questions if they are confused. After training, trainees need to review and work toward reaching the goals established in their action plan. They need to be willing to change (e.g., try new behaviors or apply new knowledge) and ask peers and managers for help if they need it.

Self-management refers to a person’s attempt to control certain aspects of his or her decision making and behavior. Training programs should prepare employees to self-manage their use of new skills and behaviors on the job. Self-management involves:

Determining the degree of support and negative consequences in the work setting for using newly acquired capabilities.

Setting goals for using learned capabilities.

Applying learned capabilities to the job.

Monitoring use of learned capabilities on the job.

Engaging in self-reinforcement.79

page 181 

Research suggests that trainees exposed to self-management strategies exhibit higher levels of transfer of behavior and skills than do trainees who are not provided with self-management strategies.80

Ensure That the Work Environment Supports Learning and Transfer

There is no magic “formula” for ensuring that transfer of training occurs. Effective strategies for transfer of training include ensuring that trainees are motivated and managers and co-workers support learning and transfer.81 These strategies are especially important when training open skills; that is, when trainees have more choice about what and how to apply trained principles. Closed skills include prescribed behaviors that likely are less influenced by managers, peers, and the work environment. Also, designing training to increase knowledge and self-efficacy has a positive relationship with transfer of training.

Table 4.13 shows a list of obstacles in the work environment that can inhibit learning and transfer of training. They include (1) lack of support from peers and managers and (2) factors related to the work itself (e.g., time pressure).

TABLE 4.13 Examples of Obstacles in the Work Environment That Inhibit Transfer of Training

Work-Related Obstacles Description of Influence

Time pressures Inadequate equipment Few opportunities to use skills Inadequate budget Trainee has difficulty using new knowledge, skills, or behavior.

Lack of Peer Support

Peers discourage use of new knowledge and skills on the job. Peers are unwilling to provide feedback. Peers see training as waste of time. Peers do not support use of new knowledge, skills, or behavior.

Lack of Management Support

Management does not accept ideas or suggestions that are learned in training. Management does not discuss training opportunities. Management opposes use of skills learned in training. Management communicates that training is a waste of time. Management is unwilling to provide reinforcement, feedback, and encouragement needed for trainees to use training content. Managers do not reinforce training or provide opportunities to use new knowledge, skills, or behavior.

Sources: Based on J. Tracey and M. Tews, “Construct Validity of a General Training Climate Scale,” Organizational Research Methods 8 (2005), pp. 353–74; R. D. Marx, “Self-Managed Skill Retention,” Training and Development Journal, January 1986, pp. 54–57.

For example, new technologies allow employees to gain access to resources and product demonstrations using the Internet or notebook computers. But while employees are being trained to use these resources with state-of-the-art technology, they often become frustrated because comparable technology is not available to them at their work site. Employees’ computers may lack sufficient memory or links to the Internet for them to use what they have learned.

These obstacles inhibit transfer because they cause lapses. Lapses take place when the trainee uses previously learned, less effective capabilities instead of trying to apply the capability emphasized in the training program. Lapses into old behavior and skill patterns are common. Trainees should try to avoid a consistent pattern of page 182slipping back or using old, ineffective learned capabilities (e.g., knowledge, skills, behaviors, and strategies). Also, trainees should understand that lapses are common and be prepared to cope with them. Trainees who are unprepared for lapses may give up trying to use new capabilities—especially trainees with low self-efficacy and/or self-confidence.

One way to ensure that learning and transfer of training occurs is to ensure that the climate for transfer is positive. Climate for transfer refers to trainees’ perceptions about a wide variety of characteristics of the work environment that facilitate or inhibit the use of trained skills or behavior. These characteristics include manager and peer support, the opportunity to use skills, and the consequences of using learned capabilities.82 Table 4.14 shows characteristics of a positive climate for transfer of training. Research has shown that transfer of training climate is significantly related to positive changes in managers’ administrative and interpersonal behaviors following training. To support the transfer of financial training emphasizing Southwest Airlines’s key business metrics, cost checklists explaining how employees can contribute to the company’s bottom line are distributed companywide following training.83 Flip charts showing highlights from manager-employee question-and-answer sessions are posted in work areas. All managers receive large posters displaying the company’s four “magic numbers” (net income, unit cost measure, net margin, and invested capital). The posters include blank columns that managers are expected to complete and regularly update to show the past year’s performance, the current year’s goals, year-to-date numbers, and quarterly results.

TABLE 4.14 Characteristics of a Positive Climate for Learning and Transfer of Training

Characteristic Example

Supervisors and co-workers encourage and set goals for trainees to use new skills and behaviors acquired in training. Newly trained managers discuss how to apply their training on the job with their supervisors and other managers.

Task cues: Characteristics of a trainee’s job prompt or remind him or her to use new skills and behaviors acquired in training. The job of a newly trained manager is designed in such a way as to allow him or her to use the skills taught in training.

Feedback consequences: Supervisors support the application of new skills and behaviors acquired in training. Supervisors notice newly trained managers who use their training.

Lack of punishment: Trainees are not openly discouraged from using new skills and behaviors acquired in training. When newly trained managers fail to use their training, they are not reprimanded.

Extrinsic reinforcement consequences: Trainees receive extrinsic rewards for using new skills and behaviors acquired in training. Newly trained managers who successfully use their training will receive a salary increase.

Intrinsic reinforcement consequences: Trainees receive intrinsic rewards for using new skills and behaviors acquired in training. Supervisors and other managers appreciate newly trained managers who perform their job as taught in training.

Sources: J. B. Tracey, S. I. Tannenbaum, and M. J. Kavanagh, “Applying Trained Skills on the Job: The Importance of the Work Environment,” Journal of Applied Psychology 80 (1995), pp. 235–52; E. Holton, “What’s Really Wrong: Diagnosis for Learning Transfer System Change,” in Improving Learning Transfer in Organizations, eds. E. Holton and T. Baldwin (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003), pp. 59–79.

Consider what AARP is doing to support learning and transfer.84 AARP’s CONNECT training program includes instructor-led courses, web-based training, peer teaching, social learning, and on-the job resources that promote transfer of what the trainees learned. Trainees focus on learning one competency such as decision-making or collaboration. To facilitate learning and transfer of training, trainees’ managers provide page 183support and encouragement. Managers whose employees are participating in the program are required to attend an online course that helps them become more effective coaches. Managers are asked to meet with the trainee before, during, and after the program to help them understand how their skills can be applied in their current job. For example, after trainees complete the course, their managers work with them to use their skills to help achieve department goals. Getting manager support and involvement has resulted in high levels of training transfer. Eighty-eight percent of managers and trainees report they have frequently used the skills they learned on the job.

Incentives can help create a positive climate for learning and transfer. Some companies are awarding microcredentials or digital badges to employees who have completed courses, earned a certification, or mastered a skill.85 Microcredentials are a competency-based and skill-focused form of credential that demonstrates skills, knowledge, and experience in a given subject area or capability. Microcredentials and digital badges are not necessarily the same. Microcredentials verify a person’s knowledge or skills based on their successful completion of a course, activity, assignment, project, portfolio, or practical assessments. Digital badges refer to electronically displayed icons that symbolize a microcredential and may link to a description of what was earned.

Microcredentials vary in reputation. Microcredentials offered by online training providers such as Courseara or Udacity in conjunction with colleges, universities, and professional associations are highly valued. Also, microcredentials offered by technology companies such as IBM, Microsoft, or Google are recognized as significant. More valuable microcredentials provide information about proof of competency or are based on accreditation by a third-party organization.

The badges can be placed in the employee’s personal profile, shared on social networks, and even put in a virtual backpack to take along to job interviews! Badges encourage learning in several ways. They provide feedback to trainees that they have completed the course or module or mastered a skill, and they provide an incentive to continue to learn in the future. Badges allow learners to display their achievements for their peers and social network to see, which encourages them to accomplish more. Also, badges help employees communicate to others what they know, which can help further their job and career opportunities. Badges are also beneficial to companies because they can be used to create a database identifying employees’ knowledge and skills. The database can be used for quickly identifying employees with specific skills or knowledge needed for a project or work team. Also, the database gives an overall picture of the company’s human capital (i.e., areas of knowledge and skills strengths and weaknesses).

At professional services firm EY, employees can earn badges through completing training in a number of different areas including artificial intelligence, blockchain, innovation, analytics, teaming, and transformational leadership.86 The EY Badges initiative encourages employees to gain the skills they need today and in the future to provide the appropriate services and advice to EY clients. To acquire a badge, employees have to complete a combination of online learning modules and apply the knowledge they learned. The badges have four levels: bronze, silver, gold, and platinum. A bronze badge demonstrates basic knowledge in an area. Silver, gold, and platinum badges require having basic knowledge, applying the skill to specified job experiences, and contributing back to the company through using the skills in projects or client interactions. Employee at EY value earning badges and often share their accomplishments on social media.

Instructional Emphasis for Learning Outcomes

This chapter’s discussion of the implications of the learning process for instruction provides general principles regarding how to facilitate learning. However, you should understand the relationship between these general principles and the learning process. Different internal and external conditions are necessary for learning page 184each outcome. Internal conditions refers to processes within the learner that must be present for learning to occur. These processes include how information is registered, stored in memory, and recalled. External conditions refers to processes in the learning environment that facilitate learning. These conditions include the physical learning environment, as well as opportunities to practice and receive feedback and reinforcement. The external conditions should directly influence the design or form of instruction. Table 4.15 shows what is needed during instruction at each step of the learning process. For example, during the process of committing training content to memory, verbal cues, verbal links to a meaningful context, and diagrams and models are necessary. If training content is not coded (or is incorrectly coded), learning will be inhibited.

TABLE 4.15 Internal and External Conditions Necessary for Learning Outcomes

Learning Outcome Internal Conditions External Conditions

Verbal Information

Labels, facts, and propositions

Previously learned knowledge and verbal information

Strategies for coding information into memory

Repeated practice

Meaningful chunks

Advance organizers

Recall cues

Intellectual Skills

Knowing how

Mastery of prerequisites

Recall of prerequisites

Link between new and previously learned knowledge

Skills taught in order from simple to complex

Provide a variety of examples and practice opportunities

Cognitive Strategies

Process of thinking and learning Recall of prerequisites, similar tasks, and strategies

Verbal description of strategy

Strategy demonstration

Practice with feedback

Variety of tasks that provide opportunity to apply strategy

Attitudes

Choice of personal action Mastery of prerequisites Identification with model Cognitive dissonance

Demonstration by a model

Positive learning environment

Strong message from credible source

Reinforcement

Motor Skills

Muscular actions

Recall of part skills

Coordination program

Practice

Demonstration

Gradual decrease of external feedback

Source: Based on R. M. Gagne and K. L. Medsker, The Conditions of Learning (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace College Publishers, 1996).

The training programs of the Culinary Institute of America (CIA) help to illustrate many of the internal and external conditions necessary to achieve learning outcomes. With campuses in New York, California, Texas, and Singapore, the CIA is the world’s finest training facility for chefs and has approximately 2,000 full-time students in its degree programs. CIA graduates are chefs in some of the best restaurants in the world and in prestigious private dining rooms (such as the White House), and they direct food service operations for large page 185hotel chains such as the Marriott, Hyatt, Radisson, and Hilton. For example, you might have heard of Cat Cora, the Iron Chef on the television show Iron Chef America. Besides offering degree programs, the CIA also hosts more than 6,000 trainees from a wide variety of companies that have food service operations.

Whether an instructor is teaching meat-cutting or sauteing techniques, the learning environments of CIA programs are basically the same. A lecture is followed by demonstration and several hours of guided hands-on practice. The trainee then receives feedback from the instructor. The trainer moves from a show-and-tell approach to become a coach over the course of the training session. Videos are produced for every class and given to students. Whether viewed from residence halls or seen at the video learning center, students review the tapes at their own pace and control what they see.

CIA programs deal not only with cognitive learning, but also with physical and emotional learning. In addition to cooking and baking courses, students are required to study psychology, total quality management practices, languages, marketing, communications, restaurant management, and team supervision. Food ethics, sustainability, physical fitness, and stress management also are required parts of the curriculum. Why? Running a commercial kitchen involves long hours and high levels of stress—it is very physically demanding. Thanks to the learning environment created at the CIA, the institute is recognized as the world leader in gastronomic training, providing a foundation of basic knowledge for chefs from around the world.87

Summary

Learning and transfer of learning must occur for training to be effective. This chapter began by defining learning and transfer of learning and identifying the capabilities that can be learned: verbal information, intellectual skills, motor skills, attitudes, and cognitive strategies. To explain how these capabilities can be learned, the chapter discussed several theories of learning: reinforcement theory, social learning theory, goal setting theory, need theories, expectancy theory, adult learning theory, and information processing theory. To understand how to ensure that what is learned is applied to the job, three transfer of training theories were discussed: identical elements, stimulus generalization, and cognitive theory. Next, the chapter investigated the learning process and its implications for how people learn. The section on learning process emphasized that internal processes (expectancy, storage, and retrieval), as well as external processes (gratifying), influence learning. The chapter then discussed the relationship between the implications of the learning process, transfer of training, and the design of instruction. Important design elements include providing learners with an understanding of why they should learn, meaningful content, practice opportunities, feedback, opportunities for interaction, and a coordinated program. Also, the training design should encourage learners to self-manage and ensure that the learners’ work environment supports learning and transfer. Microcredentials and badges are ways that employees can be incentivized to learn.

Key Terms

learning 153

transfer of training 153

generalization 153

maintenance 153

verbal information 155

intellectual skills 155

motor skills 155

attitude 155

cognitive strategies 155

reinforcement theory 156

social learning theory 156

self-efficacy 157

verbal persuasion 157

logical verification 157

modeling 157

past accomplishments 157

goal setting theory 158

goal orientation 159

page 186learning orientation 159

performance orientation 159

need 159

expectancy 160

instrumentality 160

valence 160

andragogy 161

closed skills 163

open skills 163

theory of identical elements 163

fidelity 165

near transfer 165

stimulus generalization approach 165

far transfer 165

key behavior 165

cognitive theory of transfer 165

perception 166

working storage 166

semantic encoding 167

rehearsal 167

organizing 167

elaboration 167

retrieval 167

generalizing 167

gratifying 167

instruction 168

objective 168

training context 170

practice 171

metacognition 171

self-regulation 171

advance organizers 171

overlearning 172

error management training 172

massed practice 173

spaced practice 173

overall task complexity 173

mental requirements 173

physical requirements 173

whole practice 173

part practice 173

reflection 175

automatization 175

boosters 176

microlearning 176

feedback 177

learner-content interaction 177

learner-instructor interaction 178

learner-learner interaction 178

community of practice (COP) 179

training administration 179

self-management 180

lapse 181

climate for transfer 182

microcredentials 183

internal conditions 184

external conditions 184

Discussion Questions

Compare and contrast any two of the following learning theories: expectancy theory, social learning theory, reinforcement theory, and information processing theory.

What learning condition do you think is most necessary for learning to occur? Which is least critical? Why?

Are learning and transfer of training related? Explain why or why not.

How do instructional objectives help learning to occur?

Assume that you are training an employee to diagnose and repair a loose wire in an electrical socket. After demonstrating the procedure to follow, you let the trainee show you how to do it. The trainee correctly demonstrates the process and repairs the connection on the first attempt. Has learning occurred? Justify your answer.

Your boss says, “Why do I need to tell you what type of learning capability I’m interested in? I just want a training program to teach employees how to give good customer service!” Explain to the boss how “good customer service” can be translated into different learning outcomes.

page 187How does practice help learning? What could a trainer do in a training session to ensure that trainees engage in self-regulation?

Can allowing trainees to make errors in training be useful? Explain.

What learning conditions are necessary for short- and long-term retention of training content to occur?

What is microlearning? How does it help to enhance learning and transfer of training?

What is near transfer? Far transfer? What are their implications for training design?

How can employees learn through interaction? Are some types of interaction best for learning in some situations but not others? Explain.

How can the work environment inhibit learning and transfer of training? Explain. In your opinion, what work environment characteristics have the largest influence on transfer of training? Justify your answer.

You have a one-day classroom experience in which you need to help a group of engineers and software programmers learn to become project managers. After training, they will have to manage some significant projects. Discuss the instructional characteristics and activities you will use to ensure that the engineers and software programmers learn project management.

Companies are providing employees with digital badges and microcredentials after they complete a training course or series of courses. Explain how badges and microcredentials influence learning from the perspective of one of the following theories: expectancy theory, need theory, goal setting theory, or adult learning theory.

Application Assignments

Using any source possible (magazines, journals, personal conversation with a trainer, etc.), find a description of a training program. Consider the learning process and the implications of the learning process for instruction discussed in the chapter. Evaluate the degree to which the program facilitates learning. Provide suggestions for improving the program.

You are the training director of a hotel chain, Noe Suites. Each Noe Suites hotel has 100 to 150 rooms, a small indoor pool, and a restaurant. Hotels are strategically located near the exit ramps of major highways in college towns such as East Lansing, Michigan, and Columbus, Ohio. You receive the following e-mail message from the vice president of operations. Prepare an answer.

To: You, Training Director

From: Vice President of Operations, Noe Suites

As you are probably aware, one of the most important aspects of quality service is known as “recovery”—that is, the employee’s ability to respond effectively to customer complaints. There are three possible outcomes to a customer complaint: The customer complains and is satisfied by the response; the customer complains and is dissatisfied with the response; and the customer does not complain but remains dissatisfied. Many dissatisfied customers do not complain because they want to avoid confrontation, there is no convenient way to complain, or they do not believe that complaining will do much good.

I have decided that to improve our level of customer service, we need to train our hotel staff in the “recovery” aspect of customer service. My decision is based on the results of recent focus groups we held with customers. One theme that emerged from these focus groups was that we had some page 188weaknesses in the recovery area. For example, last month in one of the restaurants, a waiter dropped the last available piece of blueberry pie on a customer as he was serving her. The waiter did not know how to correct the problem other than offer an apology.

I have decided to hire two well-known consultants in the service industry to discuss recovery, as well as to provide an overview of different aspects of quality customer service. These consultants have worked in service industries and manufacturing industries. I have scheduled the consultants to deliver a presentation in three training sessions. Each session will last three hours. There will be one session for each shift of employees (day, afternoon, and midnight shift). The sessions will consist of a presentation and question-and-answer session. The presentation will last one-and-a-half hours, and the question-and-answer session approximately 45 minutes. There will be a half-hour break.

My expectations are that following this training, the service staff will be able to recover successfully from service problems.

Because you are an expert on training, I want your feedback on the training session. Specifically, I am interested in your opinion regarding whether our employees will learn about service recovery from attending this program. Will they be able to recover from service problems in their interactions with customers? What recommendations do you have for improving the program?

Identify what is wrong with each of the following training objectives. Then rewrite it.

To be aware of the safety rules for operating the ribbon-cutting machine in three minutes.

Given a personal computer, a table, and a chair, enter the data into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.

Use the Internet to learn about training practices.

Given a street address in the city of Dublin, Ohio, be able to drive the ambulance from the station to the address in less than 10 minutes.

Watch the YouTube video of a flight simulator at www.youtube.com/watch?v=fujLrWsAp8c. Are the skills developed in the flight simulator open or closed skills? What transfer of training theory was applied to develop the flight simulator? Does the flight simulator encourage near or far transfer? Explain your answers.

Go to www.allencomm.com/portfolio/dominos for an example of training for new employees developed by AllenComm for Domino’s Pizza. Review the examples of the Pizza Maker course that are provided. What features does the Pizza Maker course include that help to enhance learning and transfer of training? Identify each feature and discuss how it enhances learning, transfer of training, or both.

Watch “Front Desk First Impressions” at www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3aR3yP4aKg, a video used to train hotel front desk associates. What features of this video can help trainees learn and transfer what they have learned to their jobs? If you were conducting this training program how would you use this video? In addition to the video, what else would you add to the training program to make it more effective?

Watch the YouTube video showing examples of microlearning at www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT8H-jp4jnM. What features included in these examples help to enhance learning and transfer of training?

Take the BuzzFeed quiz on multitasking at www.youtube.com/watch?v=txWeSnJBT-M. How did you do? Could this be why driving and doing other things like eating, texting, or putting on makeup (yes, I’ve observed this while driving) is dangerous. Have you found it difficult to multitask in your life? Explain why. Next, watch the YouTube video on multitasking at www.youtube.com/watch?v=iM4u-7Z5URk to see why it is difficult to multitask. Since our brains have difficulty multitasking, what are the page 189implications of this for training, particularly training that trainees can access anytime, anywhere, using smartphones, tablets, or notebook computers?

Watch the video showing flight attendant training at www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8lbitoBhP4. What characteristics of the training shown in this video help learning? Transfer of training?

Watch the video on Google’s experience of how their employees learn at www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhD-rojP11M. What features of learning shown in Table 4.5 are emphasized in this video? Explain the feature and provide an example of it from the video.

Watch the video “EY Badges” at www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiYvF8qx528. Do you think that this initiative motivates EY employees to learn new skills? Explain your answer. How would you determine if the EY Badges was effective or not? That is, what would you study or measure?

Case: Revised Training for the U.S. Navy

In 2017, 17 U.S. Navy sailors died in collisions involving its ships. Congressional investigations identified inadequate training in the foundational skills of seamanship as one of the likely causes for the collisions. The Navy is revising training methods for more than 75 percent of its occupations. Most of the training curriculum is hands-on work with simulations and interactive courseware with 20 percent being lecture. For example, during bootcamp the Navy has reduced the amount of time new recruits spend in the classroom and instead focus more on experiential learning to simulate conditions aboard a ship in war or peacetime. Recruits now participate in 177 hours of hands-on training during the eight weeks at boot camp, an increase of 17 hours. Officers in charge of bootcamp divisions of approximately 88 recruits evaluate their division’s weaknesses and use time to have them practice skills such as tying knots to anchor a ship rather than participate in online learning. The training involves doing multiple repetitions of the skills to ensure they are retained. Recruits spend two days on a life-size replica of a deck of a ship. The recruits practice tying lines, relaying orders, getting a ship underway, and bringing it back to port. During practice, instructors ring a bell every time recruits make a mistake. To graduate, recruits must pass an all night test in a simulator designed like the deck and hull of a warship. There are explosions to deal with, leaking pipes to repair, and fires to extinguish. The Navy is also providing specialized training after sailors finish boot camp.

What instructional characteristics does the Navy’s new training program include that facilitate learning and transfer? List each of the characteristics and explain how it enhances learning and transfer. What transfer of training theory has been used to design the training? Explain the theory and how it is being used in the training. Explain how a community of practice (COP) could be beneficial for Navy training.

Sources: Based on L. Weber, “How the Navy Revamped Boot Camp,” The Wall Street Journal, March 30, 2020, pp. R4, R5; “Recruit Training Command,” from www.bootcamp.navy.mil, accessed March 5, 2021; R. Powers, “Navy Boot Camp,” The Balance Careers, October 21, 2019, from the www.thebalancecareers.com, accessed March 5, 2021; “What Should I Expect at Navy Basic Training?” Indeed, February 4, 2020, from indeed.com, accessed March 5, 2021.

Endnotes

 1. R. M. Gagne and K. L. Medsker, The Conditions of Learning (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace, 1996).

 2. M. L. Broad and J. W. Newstrom, Transfer of Training (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992).

 3. B. F. Skinner, Science and Human Behavior (New York: Macmillan, 1953).

 4. L. R. Scott, “A Behavioral Approach to Occupational Safety: Pinpointing and Reinforcing Safe Performance in a Food Manufacturing Plant,” Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (1978), pp. 434–45.

page 190 5. A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986); A. Bandura, “Self-Efficacy Mechanisms in Human Behavior,” American Psychologist 37 (1982), pp. 122–47.

 6. A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986).

 7. M. E. Gist and T. R. Mitchell, “Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability,” Academy of Management Review 17 (1992), pp. 183–221.

 8. “Training Top 125 Top 10 Hall of Fame Outstanding Training Initiatives, Verizon: The New Verizon Plan–Pricing Launching Training,” training, January/February 2017, pp. 56–57.

 9. E. A. Locke and G. D. Latham, A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990).

 10. E. A. Locke and G. D. Latham, A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990).

 11. E. A. Locke et al., “Goal Setting and Task Performance,” Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981), pp. 125–152.

 12. T. D. Ludwig and E. S. Geller, “Assigned Versus Participative Goal Setting and Response Generalization: Managing Injury Control Among Professional Pizza Drivers,” Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997), pp. 253–61.

 13. S. Fisher and J. Ford, “Differential Effects of Learner Effort and Goal Orientation on Two Learning Outcomes,” Personnel Psychology 51 (1998), pp. 397–420; S. Payne, S. Youngcourt, and J. M. Beaubien, “A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net,” Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (2007), pp. 128–50.

 14. D. VandeWalle, D. W. Cron, and J. Slocum, “The Role of Goal Orientation Following Performance Feedback,” Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001), pp. 629–40; R. Noe and J. Colquitt, “Planning for Impact Training: Principles of Training Effectiveness,” in Creating, Implementing, and Managing Effective Training and Development, ed. K. Kraiger (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002), pp. 53–79; A. Schmidt and J. Ford, “Learning within a Learner Control Training Environment: The Interactive Effects of Goal Orientation and Metacognitive Instruction on Learning Outcomes,” Personnel Psychology 56 (2003), pp. 405–29.

 15. A. H. Maslow, “A Theory of Human Motivation,” Psychological Reports 50 (1943), pp. 370–96; C. P. Alderfer, “An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 4 (1969), pp. 142–75.

 16. D. McClelland, “Managing Motivation to Expand Human Freedom,” American Psychologist 33 (1978), pp. 201–10.

 17. V. H. Vroom, Work and Motivation (New York: John Wiley, 1964).

 18. M. S. Knowles, “Adult Learning,” in The ASTD Training and Development Handbook, ed. R. L. Craig (New York: McGraw-Hill), pp. 253–65.

 19. M. Knowles, The Adult Learner, 4th ed. (Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1990).

 20. “Spirited learning,” T+D, October 2009, pp. 56–58; J. Salopek, “From Learning Department to Learning Partner,” T+D, October 2010, pp. 48–50; and J. Salopek, “Keeping Knowledge Safe and Sound,” T+D, October 2010, pp. 64–66.

 21. “Top 125 2018 Rankings 46–55, New York Life Insurance Company,” training, January/February 2018, pp. 60–61.

page 191 22. R. M. Gagne and K. L. Medsker, The Conditions of Learning (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace, 1996); W. C. Howell and N. J. Cooke, “Training the Human Information Processor: A Review of Cognitive Models,” in Training and Development in Organizations, eds. I. L. Goldstein and Associates (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991), pp. 121–82.

 23. R. M. Gagne, “Learning Processes and Instruction,” Training Research Journal 1 (1995/96), pp. 17–28.

 24. S. L. Yelonand and J. K. Ford, “Pursuing a Multidimensional View of Transfer,” Performance Improvement Quarterly 12 (1999), pp. 58–78; K. Kapp, “Matching the Right Design Strategy to the Right Content,” T+D, July 2011, pp. 48–52; and S. Yelon, J. Ford, and S. Bhatia, “How Trainees Transfer What They have Learned,” Performance Improvement Quarterly 27 (2014), pp. 27–52.

 25. D. Cameron, “Dreamliner’s here: Now learn to fly it,” The Wall Street Journal, November 1, 2011, p. B3.

 26. J. M. Royer, “Theories of the Transfer of Learning,” Educational Psychologist 14 (1979), pp. 53–69.

 27. E. L. Thorndike and R. S. Woodworth, “The Influence of Improvement of One Mental Function Upon the Efficiency of Other Functions,” Psychological Review 8 (1901), pp. 247–61.

 28. J. F. Reintzell, “When Training Saves Lives,” Training and Development 51 (1997), pp. 41–42.

 29. J. A. Sparrow, “The Measurement of Job Profile Similarity for the Prediction of Transfer of Learning,” Journal of Occupational Psychology 62 (1989), pp. 337–41.

 30. K. Kraiger & J. Ford, “The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work”, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 8 (2021): 45–72; R. M. Gagne, “Learning processes and instruction,” Training Research Journal 1 (1995/96), pp. 17–28.

 31. K. Kraiger and J. Ford, “The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 8 (2021): 45–72; R. Mayer, “Applying the Science of Learning: Evidence-Based Principles for the Design of Multimedia Instruction,” American Psychologist, November 2008, pp. 760–69; R. Clark and R. Mayer, “Learning by Viewing Versus Learning by Doing: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Principled Learning Environments,” Performance Improvement 47 (2008), pp. 5–13.

 32. “Cognitive Strategies,” Chapter 6 in Gagne and Medsker, The Conditions of Learning (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace, 1996); M. Gist, “Training Design and Pedagogy: Implications for Skill Acquisition, Maintenance, and Generalization,” in Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace, eds. R. Quinches and A. Ehrenstein (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1997), pp. 201–22.

 33. D. Kolb, “Management and the Learning Process,” California Management Review 18 (1996), pp. 21–31.

 34. K. Kraiger and J. Ford, “The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 8 (2021), pp. 45–72.

 35. R. M. Gagne, “Learning Processes and Instruction,” Training Research Journal 1 (1995/96), pp. 17–28; R. Brinkerhoff and A. Apking, High Impact Learning Strategies for Leveraging Performance and Business Results from Training Investments (Cambridge, MA: Perseus, 2001); M. Torrance, “Nine Moments of Learning,” T+D, September 2014, pp. 76–77.

 36. D. Defilippo and L. Shapiro, “A Day in the Life of a Learning Objective,” Chief Learning Officer, October 2016, pp. 50–53.

 37. J. Phillips and P. Phillips, “The Power of Objectives,” Chief Learning Officer, April 2020, p. 20; B. Mager, Preparing Instructional Objectives, 5th ed. (Belmont, CA: Lake Publishing, 1997); B. J. Smith and B. L. Delahaye, How to Be an Effective Trainer, 2nd ed. (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987); S. Moore, J. Ellsworth, and R. Kaufman, “Objectives—Are They Useful? A Quick Assessment,” Performance Improvement Quarterly 47 (2008), pp. 41–47.

page 192 38. J. Phillips and P. Phillips, “The Power of Objectives: Moving Beyond Learning Objectives,” Performance Improvement, July 2010, pp. 17–24.

 39. K. A. Smith-Jentsch et al., “Can Pre-Training Experiences Explain Individual Differences in Learning?” Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (1996), pp. 110–16; S. Caudron, “Learners Speak Out. What Actual Learners Think About Actual Training,” Training and Development, April 2000, pp. 27–52.

 40. B. Bower, “Tap Into Emotion to Meet Learning Objectives,” T+D, June 2020, pp. 70–71; J. K. Ford et al., “Relationship of Goal Orientation, Metacognitive Activity, and Practice Strategies with Learning Outcomes and Transfer,” Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1998), pp. 218–33; A. Schmidt and J. Ford, “Learning within a Learner Control Training Environment: The Interactive Effects of Goal Orientation and Metacognitive Instruction on Learning Outcomes,” Personnel Psychology 56 (2003), pp. 405–29; S. Yelon, L. Sheppard, and J. Ford, “Intention to Transfer: How do Autonomous Professionals Become Motivated to Use New Ideas?” Performance Improvement Quarterly 17, no. 2 (2004), pp. 82–103; M. Hequet, “Training No One Wants,” training, January 2004, pp. 22–28.

 41. C. Quinn, “The Cognitive Science Behind Learning,” Chief Learning Officer, January/February 2017, pp. 37–57; R. Clark and R. Mayer, “Learning by Viewing Versus Learning by Doing: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Principled Learning Environments,” Performance Improvement 47 (2008), pp. 5–13; T. Katz-Navon, E. Naveh, and Z. Stren, “Active learning: When is More Better? The Case of Resident Physicians’ Medical Errors,” Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2009), pp. 1200–9.

 42. K. Kraiger and J. Ford, “The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 8 (2021), pp. 45–72; J. Cannon-Bowers et al., “A Framework for Understanding Pre-Practice Conditions and Their Impact on Learning,” Personnel Psychology 51 (1998), pp. 291–320.

 43. A. Schmidt and J. Ford, “Learning Within a Learner Control Training Environment: The Interactive Effects of Goal Orientation and Metacognitive Instruction on Learning Outcomes,” Personnel Psychology 56 (2003), pp. 405–29.

 44. J. Hardy, E. Day III, and L. Steele, “Interrelationships Among Self-Regulated Learning Processes: Toward a Dynamic Process-Based Model of Self-Regulated Learning,” Journal of Management 45 (2019), pp. 3146–177; J. Donovan and J. Nicklin “Taking Charge of Your Own Learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Training and Employee Development, ed. K. Brown (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 148–74; T. Sitzmann et al., “A Multilevel Analysis of the Effect of Prompting Self-Regulation in Technology Driven Instruction,” Personnel Psychology 62 (2009), pp. 697–734; T. Sitzmann and K. Ely, “Sometimes You Need a Reminder: The Effects of Prompting Self-Regulation on Regulatory Processes, Learning, and Attrition,” Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (2010), pp. 132–44; T. Sitzmann and K. Ely, “A Meta-Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning in Work-Related Training and Educational Attainment: What We Know and Where We Need to Go,” Psychological Bulletin 137 (2011), pp. 421–22.

 45. P. Shank, “Self-Sufficient Learners Make Successful Workers,” T+D, April 2017, pp. 43–46.

 46. K. Kraiger and J. Ford, “The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 8 (2021), pp. 45–72; B. S. Bell and S. W. J. Kozlowski, “Active Learning: Effects of Core Training Design Elements on Self-Regulatory Processes, Learning, and Adaptability,” Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008), pp. 296–316; K. Pagano, “The Missing Piece,” T+D, June 2014, pp. 40–45.

 47. P. Leone and R. Pinkston, “Practice Makes Perfect,” T+D, March 2017, pp. 62–63.

 48. K. Dahlin, Y. Chuang, and T. Roulet, “Opportunity, Motivation, and Ability to Learn from Failures and Errors: Review, Synthesis, and Ways to Move Forward,” Academy of Management Annals 12 (2018), pp. 252–77; D. Heimbeck et al., “Integrating Errors into the Training Process: The Function of page 193Error Management Instructions and the Role of Goal Orientation,” Personnel Psychology 56 (2003), pp. 333–61; N. Keith and M. Frese, “Self-Regulation in Error Management Training: Emotion Control and Metacognition as Mediators of Performance Effects,” Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (2005), pp. 677–91; and N. Keith and M. Frese, “Effectiveness of Error Management Training: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008), pp. 59–69.

 49. J. Donovan and D. Radosevich, “A Meta-Analytic Review of the Distribution of Practice Effect: Now You See It, Now You Don’t,” Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (1999), pp. 795–805.

 50. A. Wurth, “Cement Plan,” T+D, April 2019, pp. 63–67; R. M. Mager, Making Instruction Work (Belmont, CA: David Lake, 1988).

 51. K. Kraiger and V. Mattingly, “Cognitive and Neural Foundations of Learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Training and Employee Development, ed. K. Brown (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 11–37; “The Art & Science of Learning That Sticks,” Grovo, from www.grovo.com, accessed February 9, 2018; D. Rock, “Your Brain on Learning,” Chief Learning Officer, May 2015, pp. 30–48; A. Beninghof, “Pathways to Retention,” T+D, June 2015, pp. 21–22; R. Weiss, “Memory and Learning,” Training and Development, October 2000, pp. 46–50; R. Zemke, “Toward a Science of Training,” training, July 1999, pp. 32–36.

 52. K. Clark, “The Browns’ Strategy: Write This Down,” The Wall Street Journal, August 12, 2014, p. D6.

 53. R. Feloni, “The Simple Daily Exercise Boost Employee Performance,” Business Insider, from www.businessinsider.in, accessed July 29, 2014; G. Di Stefano, F. Gino, G. Pisano, and B. Staats, “Learning by Thinking: How Reflection Aids Performance,” Harvard Business School Working Paper, 14–093 (March 25, 2014).

 54. A. Kohn, “Use It or Lose It,” T+D, February 2015, pp. 56–61; J. Karpicke and Henry Roediger III, “The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning,” Science, February 15, 2008, pp. 966–68.

 55. J. C. Naylor and G. D. Briggs, “The Effects of Task Complexity and Task Organization on the Relative Efficiency of Part and Whole Training Methods,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1963), pp. 217–24.

 56. M. Plater, “Three Trends Shaping Learning,” Chief Learning Officer, June 2014, pp. 44–47.

 57. S. Salomonsen, “Employ a Microlearning Content Strategy in Three Steps,” T+D, June 2020, pp. 16–17; T. Maddox, “Scenario-Based Microlearning for Soft Skills,” Chief Learning Officer, December 2019, p. 62; A. Fox, “Microlearning for Effective Performance Management,” T+D, April 2016, pp. 116–17.

 58. M. Cole, Microlearning: Delivering Bite-Sized Knowledge (Alexandria, VA: Association for Talent Development, 2017); L. Kolodny, “One Way to Train Workers One Small Bite at a Time,” The Wall Street Journal, March 14, 2016, p. R6.

 59. A. Merrick, “Bite-Sized Learning,” HR Magazine, Spring 2019, pp. 68–73; A. Shatto and J. Ruiz, “Zooming in on Purpose-Driven Microlearning,” Chief Learning Officer, January/February 2018, pp. 45–47, 57; M. Cole, Microlearning: Delivering Bite-Sized Knowledge (Alexandria, VA: Association for Talent Development, 2017).

 60. R. Mayer, “Applying the Science of Learning: Evidence-Based Principles for the Design of Multimedia Instruction,” American Psychologist, November 2008, pp. 760–69.

 61. R. M. Gagne and K. L. Medsker, The Conditions of Learning (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace, 1996).

 62. J. Goodman and R. Wood, “Feedback Specificity, Learning Opportunities, and Learning,” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004), pp. 809–21.

page 194 63. P. J. Decker and B. R. Nathan, Behavior Modeling Training: Principles and Applications (New York: Praeger, 1985); M. Merril, “First Principles of Instruction,” Educational Technology Research and Development 50 (2002), pp. 43–59; K. Kapp, “Matching the Right Design Strategy to the Right Content,” T+D, July 2011, pp. 48–52.

 64. S. Caudron, “Learners Speak Out. What Actual Learners Think About Actual Training,” Training and Development, April 2000, pp. 52–57.

 65. J. Bozarth, “Show Your Work,” T+D, May 2013, pp. 46–51.

 66. B. Bell and S. W. J. Kozlowski, “Active Learning: Effects of Core Training Design Elements on Self–Regulatory Processes, Learning, and Adaptability,” Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008), pp. 296–316; H. Nuriddin, “Building the Right Interaction,” T+D, March 2010, pp. 32–35.

 67. S. Gale, “When It Comes to Technology, All That Glitters is Not Gold,” Chief Learning Officer, September 2016, pp. 36–40.

 68. S. Oberstein, “Any Questions,” T+D, December 2020, pp. 34–37.

 69. J. Kostek and A. Stewart, “No Attention Means No Learning,” T+D, March 2018, pp. 20–22; D. Leonard and W. Swap, “Deep Smarts,” Harvard Business Review, September 2004, pp. 88–97.

 70. “Farmers Insurance: CE-It’s Up to Me,” training, January/February 2017, pp. 58–59; “General Motors Sales, Service, & Marketing Division: District Manager New Hire Learning Journey,” training, January/ February 2017, p. 97.

 71. S. Carliner, “Instructional Strategies to Motivate,” T+D, May 2019, pp. 77–80.

 72. D. Stamps, “Communities of Practice,” training, February 1997, pp. 35–42; S. Gilbert and A. Silvers, “Learning Communities with Purpose,” T+D, January 2015, pp. 48–51.

 73. L. Freifeld, “LeadingRE’s #1 Listing,” training, January/February 2018, pp. 22–28.

 74. M. Weinstein, “Rx for Excellence,” training, February 2009, pp. 48–52.

 75. B. Kirkman et al., “Managing a New Collaborative Entity in Business Organizations: Understanding Organizational Communities of Practice Effectiveness,” Journal of Applied Psychology 96 (2011), pp. 1234–45.

 76. R. Williams and J. Cothrel, “Four Smart Ways to Run On-Line Communities,” Sloan Management Review, Summer 2000, pp. 81–91.

 77. B. J. Smith and B. L. Delahaye, How to Be an Effective Trainer, 2nd ed. (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987); M. Van Wa, N. J. Cayer, and S. Cook, Handbook of Training and Development for the Public Sector (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993).

 78. J. Barbazette, Managing the Training Function for Bottom-Line Results (San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2008).

 79. C. A. Frayne and J. M. Geringer, “Self-Management Training for Joint Venture General Managers,” Human Resource Planning 15 (1993), pp. 69–85; L. Burke and T. Baldwin, “Workforce Training Transfer: A Study of the Effect of Relapse Prevention Training and Transfer Climate,” Human Resource Management, Fall 1999, pp. 227–42; C. Frayne and J. Geringer, “Self-Management Training for Improving Job Performance: A Field Experiment Involving Salespeople,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, pp. 361–72.

 80. A. Tziner, R. R. Haccoun, and A. Kadish, “Personal and Situational Characteristics Influencing the Effectiveness of Transfer of Training Strategies,” Journal of Occupational Psychology 64 (1991): 167–177; R. A. Noe, J. A. Sears, and A. M. Fullenkamp, “‘Release Training: Does It Influence Trainees’ Post-Training Behavior and Cognitive Strategies?” Journal of Business and Psychology 4 (1990): 317–328; M. E. Gist, C. K. Stevens, and A. G. Bavetta, “Effects of Self-Efficacy and Post-Training Intervention on the Acquisition and Maintenance of Complete Interpersonal Skills,” Personal page 195Psychology 44 (1991): 837–861; M. J. Tews and J. B. Tracey, “An Empirical Examination of Post Training on-the-job Supplements for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Interpersonal Skills Training,” Personnel Psychology 61 (2008): 375–401.

 81. B. Bell and S. W. J. Kozlowski, “Active Learning: Effects of Core Training Design Elements on Self–Regulatory Processes, Learning, and Adaptability,” Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008), pp. 296–316; H. Nuriddin, “Building the Right Interaction,” T+D, March 2010, pp. 32–35; B. Blume, J. Ford, T. Baldwin, and J. Huang, “Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Journal of Management 36 (2010), pp. 1065–105.

 82. J. B. Tracey, S. I. Tannenbaum, and M. J. Kavanaugh, “Applying Trained Skills on the Job: The Importance of the Work Environment,” Journal of Applied Psychology 80 (1995), pp. 239–52; P. E. Tesluk et al., “Generalization of Employee Involvement Training to the Job Setting: Individual and Situations Effects,” Personnel Psychology 48 (1995), pp. 607–32; J. K. Ford et al., “Factors Affecting the Opportunity to Perform Trained Tasks on the Job,” Personnel Psychology 45 (1992), pp. 511–27; E. Holton, R. Bates, and W. Ruona, “Development of a Generalized Learning Transfer System Inventory,” Human Resource Development Quarterly 11 (2001), pp. 333–60; and K. Bunch, “Training Failure as a Consequence of Organizational Culture,” Human Resource Development Review 6 (2007), pp. 142–63.

 83. S. Boehle, “Dollars and Sense,” training (June 2007), pp. 42–45.

 84. S. Castellano, “Rewriting the Rules,” T+D, October 2019, pp. 62–65.

 85. A. Collins, “Go Micro,” T+D, June 2020, pp. 50–55; A. Moore, “Do You Have a Badge for That? T+D, February 2018, pp. 23–25.

 86. K. Klear, “A Better Working World,” Chief Learning Officer, May/June 2020, pp. 32–33; “Personalized Career Development,” EY, from www.ey.com/en_us/careers/personalized-career-development, accessed January 15, 2021; E. Tadros, “EY’s Secret to Future-Proofing Staff,” Financial Review, June 15, 2019, from www.afr.com, accessed January 15, 2021.

 87. R. Zemke, “Cooking Up World-Class Training,” training 34 (1997), pp. 52–58; www.ciachef.edu, website for The Culinary Institute of America, accessed March 18, 2015.