Unit III Scholarly ActivityAssignment Content Assignment objective: Create an annotated bibliography of two academically credible sources and a research proposal of at least one full paragraph. Leng

Ehrhardt, M. (2023). The money game: Student-athletes’ battle for employee status. New York Law

School Review, 67(1), 61–77.

Ehrhardt’s article focuses heavily on the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s

(NCAA) laws and policies regarding paying athletes. The article also discusses millions of

dollars made by collegiate coaches and ultimately argues that college athletes should

not only be able to profit off their name, image, and likeness (NIL) but also should be

compensated as employees of their respective universities. I will use this article to help show

arguments that athletes should be paid.

Walsh, M. (2021). Commodification of college athletes’ name, image, and likeness. Creighton Law

Review, 55(1), 79-111.

Walsh’s article considers not only whether college athletes should be paid, but also

the repercussions if athletes’ NILs are turned into commodities. The article examines

opposing arguments on whether college athletes should be paid but ultimately claims that these

arguments miss a crucial piece of the puzzle—who should be paying these athletes. Walsh

indicates that if athletes are to be paid, it should not be by their universities but rather by the

businesses that profit from their NIL. This article will be used to explore the middle ground

between the two major arguments in my paper.

Proposal:

College athletics, particularly football and basketball, are a huge industry with dedicated fans throughout the country. College athletes must maintain their studies and practice, travel, and play at near professional levels, but they are not paid for their talents. Recent debates about this issue center on whether these athletes should be paid, and if so by whom, or if the perks and education they receive are payment enough. Proponents for paying college athletes argue that universities and sports-affiliated companies make millions of dollars off players’ names, images, and likenesses (NIL), and thus, the players should be compensated. Opponents argue that these athletes are receiving incredibly high-level training and coaching that will prepare them for professional leagues and are often offered full athletic scholarships and living allotments, eliminating the need to take out loans for classes and board, and thus, should not be paid extra. Because of the revenue and fandom they create for their universities and teams as well as the companies that profit off selling jerseys and other merchandise using players’ NIL, college athletes should be monetarily compensated.