editing my paper
Academic Blog #1: A Writing Sample/Personal EssayDUE: Thursday January 12, 2017 [In Class and Online]
Purpose (Mine and Yours) |
|
Description/Steps |
Answer the question below in a standard essay format.
|
REQUIREMENTS
In this paper, you will take a closer look at something very familiar to you. Your family.
TOPIC: I want you to write an opinion paper about a member of your family that has influenced your life greatly. Choose someone whom you appreciate and admire. Think about the following question as you write your paper. What characteristics does this person have that make him/her an admirable person?
Requirements:
- Times New Roman typeface
-double spacing
-12 point font
- 2.5 to 3 pages in length
- an introduction with a thesis statement
-well organized paragraphs [one idea per paragraph please]
-an understandable conclusion
-the writing in the paper is clear and understandable.
-the paper is complete and turned in on time
- no outside sources except a dictionary
- do not translate complete sentences on google.
25 points total
Formatting and Correct Submission on Blackboard.5 points/ 1 point per point.
Page length ____
Times New Roman, 12 point font ____
Double spaced with correct margins ____
Saved correctly as a word document and attached on blackboard ____
The paper is not late ____
5 points
.25 | .5 | .75 | 1 point | |
Sentence Structure | The misuse of sentence structure impedes the reading of the paper. | The sentence structure is incorrect or the author does not have a variety of sentence types. | Sentence structure is sometimes incorrect, but there are still a variety of sentence types throughout the paper. | Sentence structure is flawless throughout the paper. The writer uses a variety of sentence types: simple, compound and complex. |
Punctuation | The misuse of punctuation impedes the reading of the paper. | Punctuation is often an issue in the paper. | Punctuation is rarely an issue in the paper. | The punctuation is correct throughout the paper. |
Spelling | The spelling errors make impede the reading of the paper. | Words are often misspelled, but understandable. | Words are rarely misspelled. | The spelling is correct throughout the paper. |
Word Choice | The word choice impedes the meaning or the reading of the paper. | Words are often misused. | Words are often used appropriately | Words are used appropriately: Correct part of speech. |
Grammar | Many (more than 10 per page) tense, noun, or pronoun agreement issues | Several (more than 5, less than 10) tense, noun or pronoun agreement issues | Few (less than 5 per page) tense, noun or pronoun agreement issues | No Tense, noun or pronoun agreement issues |
10 points
.75 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 point | |
Introduction | The introduction is incomplete. | The introduction is missing 2 parts | The introduction is missing 1 part. | The introduction is complete with an attention getter/ general exposition, necessary background information, and a direct thesis statement that presents the topic and the controlling idea/purpose of the paper. |
Body Paragraph Structure | The body paragraphs are not organized as academic paragraphs. | The body paragraphs are somewhat complete but missing much important information. | The body paragraphs are almost complete. | The body paragraph has: A clear topic sentence centered on a single controlling idea, supporting sentences that explain that controlling idea, specific examples that clarify the explanations, and a conclusion sentence. |
Body Paragraph Unity | There is no controlling idea in the paragraph. | There are several details that cannot be connected to the controlling idea. | There may be a few details that are off topic. | All of the examples and supporting sentences in the paragraph should serve to explain one controlling idea, which is stated in the topic sentence. |
Coherence of Ideas | The paragraphs are too incoherent to read. | The paragraphs have too many ideas that are mixed or ordered in a way that is not logical or explainable. | The paragraph is mostly coherent, with few problem areas. | Words, and sentences in the paragraph have a logical flow from one to another. There is also an apparent logical order of ideas. There is no repetition of ideas. |
Conclusion | It is difficult to detect if the conclusion serves as a conclusion to the paper. | The conclusion is missing necessary parts. | The conclusion is mostly complete. | There is a conclusion. The conclusion follows a traditional: specific to general organization. The author should begin by summarizing the main points of the paper before ending with a general concluding statement. |
5 points
.25 | .5 | .75 | 1 point | |
Depth of Details | The writer does not use enough detail to support his/her ideas. | The writer uses details that are either too general or lack clarity. | The writer uses details that are clear but general. | The writer uses details that are specific and logically provide an explanation of the controlling idea. |
Variety of Details | There is no variety in the kinds of details that the author uses. | There is a large imbalance in the variety of details that the author uses. | There may be a slight imbalance in the variety of details that the author uses. | The writer uses a variety of facts and opinions to support his/her claims. |
Academic Word Choice | The writer’s use of words is mostly incorrect. | The writer may have frequent misuse of academic words, or a frequent occurrence of informal words. | The writer makes no word choice error, but may fail to provide a diversity of academic words. | Part of academic word choice means avoiding unnecessary, informal, overgeneralized words [ thing, stuff, all the people] Also, no personal pronouns [I, you, us, they, them etc.] Along with not using any inappropriate words, the writer makes an effort to use specific academic words [Academic Word List] |
Warrant | The writer does not support his/her claims with specific examples. | The writer frequently makes unsupported or unwarranted claims. | The writer mostly makes claims that he/she supports with specific examples. | The writer does not make claims that he/she does not back up with specific examples. |
Synthesis | The paragraphs are not linked to any controlling idea in the paper. | Some of the paragraphs cannot be linked to the controlling idea in the thesis statement. | Mostly all of the ideas/paragraphs serve to explain the controlling idea in the thesis statement. | All of the body paragraphs serve to explain the controlling idea in the thesis statement. |