fix the paper

Zihao Zhou

Eng. 108

Has the Internet Changed the Meaning of Privacy?

I analyzed Daniel Solove’s article, “There’s Nothing to Hide” for this essay. Privacy can be called a plurality of ideologies or situations with common elements or characteristics, but they are similar to those described by the American philosopher John Dewey. For example, invasion of privacy may mean someone peeping into another or secretly making it public for everyone to know. Privacy may also be invaded when you publicly announce your personal data or the government collects files about you (Lunsford, Ruskiewiscz, and Walters 737).

According to Solove, the government, especially in the United States, was able to obtain all the basic information about the individual. It tracks all activities, including financial activities, health, business and family activities (742). It collects such vast amounts of data and documents for future reference in case individuals appear to be or are suspected of posing a threat to the security of the country. These are a feature of the response of the United States and many other governments to security issues.

The author has established his spirit, a sign that in a way his attitude conveys not only a great deal of importance to privacy but also a deep understanding of people's perceptions of privacy. In the UK, there are cameras in almost every corner of the street. Logically, this is a way for governments to violate people's privacy, because they can always find someone's whereabouts. But again, it helps security wisdom. Surveillance through these cameras to help maintain close security, terrorist attacks and criminal activities.

Solove appeals to ethos in this article. Solove is an expert studying privacy-law. So he has the authority to discuss the Internet privacy issue in a deeper manner. (Here, describe Solove’s different positions and expertise background. Tell readers that because of his background, he has the position of talking about this privacy issues from a perspective that we don’t know. Also because of his authority in this topic, Solove also builds up his credibility and trustworthiness at the same time). and he combines them into one of the three main principles of argument: sadness, emblem, and spirit. He felt in today's world, we live in a digital platform, almost everything is done through the Internet. And how readers use signs, morbidities, and spirits in argumentation. Because the Internet for people of all races around the world to provide a diversified social platform to connect and share. It also enhances the dissemination of information around the world. The world has been digitized through the creation of the Internet. "The spirit of the author strengthens," based on personality (the spirit) of the argument depends on trust. But the Internet makes a lot of things more subtle. Including the transfer of funds, that is, online money. Some people also created an online market, people can in their The door to shopping and delivery. Spirit This is a good thing to develop wise. But the Internet has also made the development of privacy issues become serious Although the Internet has created good intentions, the Internet has in many ways increased the invasion of privacy platform. Privacy is not important when it comes to hiding bad stuff so that their basic information such as gender, full name, date of birth, e-mail address and many other personal data has been rendered non-private. Only in most social media platforms Such as LinkedIn, Facebook Twitter, and Instagram, but few people are free to show them where they live or what they eat and their personal assets they can freely display on social media. DANIEL J. SOLOVE The reader is called upon to take the view that an individual does not value privacy but can not know it directly to the government, since he makes an argument based on his experience as a judge and uses his credibility to introduce the next topic he will discuss "I 've Got Nothing to Hide ".

In order to convince the reader he used a high level of writing, he used a veto, the other one by one example of the one to do, and finally to confirm his statement is right.

)reader of the Internet that describes privacy only if you do not expose your secrets. But the information about yourself is well presented to the public. People feel that privacy is only a secret, only one person can be released is a complete argument. Such examples show that the author's spirit is evidenced by strong examples. Solove appeals to logos by redefining privacy, giving examples and refuting the fallacy “There’s Nothing to Hide” .(In this paragraph, ) In view of this, when a person's privacy is violated, how a person's response is important. Responses to emotions cause problems between the parties. In social media, there are some cases of hacking, funny post was uploaded to the innocent timetable. A person reacts emotionally through feelings of anger and anonymity. Now, for a person completely ignorant of what happened, the arrest is what the situation is, and according to a reminder, he or she may be a threat to national security. Solove also appeals to pathos, by using Franz Kafka's novels as examples. (Here, briefly describe what Kafka’s novel talk about. Explain that by reading Kafka’s story, Solove successfully got the audience involved and identify with Kafka’s character and concerned about privacy issues.) were arrested around the man and did not give them arrest. He found the government had a file containing all the information, but did not know. Using information obtained on this and making conclusions and decisions on behalf of the person without his participation in his own work (Kafka 50-58). This is due to monitoring the results, which is a misunderstanding. The emotional impact of this person is not easy to understand. He walked for a moment in the interrogation room, and he had to say, “I have nothing to hide” (give page number here). This is a kind of emotional impact, he must be harassment. Too embarrassed. So that the spirit of the author will give readers a deeper understanding of the importance of privacy.

Therefore, to convince the public that the Internet completely changed the true meaning of privacy, I would choose logistics. Only logic, everyone has a private life. If the wife and husband sleep, do not eat dinner for their private life. This is their logic, do not tell everyone what happened the night before. But on social media, you find that certain types of state uploads on such sites are desirable. A wide variety of things can be found on such sites and people do not feel shameful. But when the government came in, everyone was a bit weird.

It is logical that the government should not collect information about people's lives and, to a certain extent, record their documents. It can be used as a security measure, but an individual's right to privacy. It was invaded. In cases where the Government must take action against those who suspect it is a threat, those individuals should be allowed to participate in any decisions that must be taken if their personal life is involved. That is, if it is not the conviction of the court.

Privacy determines the disclosure of people's secrets is wrong. According to Bruce, "do nothing" argument has a wrong reasoning, privacy is not to disclose a person's error. Assuming privacy is to protect a person's wrongdoing is a problem that has led to the invasion of privacy now. In fact, the meaning of privacy has been eroded by this fact. Disclosure of people's mistakes is caused by the difficulties of several government systems, especially when dealing with situations such as those discussed above.

All in all, the Internet has changed the meaning of privacy. As mentioned above, privacy is a multiple of the problem (Lunsford, Ruskiewiscz, and Walters 739). The engagement of the social media platform over the Internet has created the assumption that personal data such as gender, employment and geographic location are not important to private ownership. It also creates a hypothesis that privacy is only to protect people's wrongdoing, not their basic information. This is the cause of government difficulties systems in the war against insecurity, terrorism and criminal activity. It is happening in Britain, where millions of camera’s are there for surveillance with the attempt to fight insecurity.

Schneier, Bruce “The Eternal Value of Privacy,” Wired, May 18, 2006. http://wwwwired.com/news/columns/1,70886-0.html.

Dewey, John Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (1938; repr. vol. 12 of The Later Works of John Dewey, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991), 112.

Kafka, Franz. the trial. new york: trans. willer and edwin muir, 1956.

Lunsford, Andrea A, John J Ruskiewiscz and Keith Walters. everything's an argument with readings. New York: Bedford/ st martins's markmillan education imprint, 2016.

Outline:

Outline: Your motivation, and why you chose this article, not others.

Solove’s ethos: His multiple titles and positions (authority) in the privacy law area. He redefines “privacy” (credibility and trustworthiness)

Logos: Solove counter-argue and refute the “Nothing-to-Hide” fallacy

Pathos: Kafka’s novel to help audience relate to their own life experience

You evaluation of this article. Is Sololve’s argument effective or not?