I need this home work done in 48 hours

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150	Assignment 2.2: Justification Report – Part 2
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Include and revise the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Insufficiently included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Partially included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Satisfactorily included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Thoroughly included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.
2. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Did not submit or incompletely recorded bibliographic information during research.	Insufficiently researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Insufficiently recorded bibliographic information during research.	Partially researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Partially recorded bibliographic information during research.	Satisfactorily researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Satisfactorily recorded bibliographic information during research.	Thoroughly researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Thoroughly recorded bibliographic information during research.
3. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Insufficiently used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Partially used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Satisfactorily used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Thoroughly used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.
4. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely organized the assignment by your criteria. Did not submit or incompletely explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Did not submit or incompletely explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Insufficiently organized the assignment by your criteria. Insufficiently explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Insufficiently explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Partially organized the assignment by your criteria. Partially explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Partially explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Satisfactorily organized the assignment by your criteria. Satisfactorily explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Satisfactorily explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Thoroughly organized the assignment by your criteria. Thoroughly explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Thoroughly explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.
5. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.	Insufficiently summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.	Partially summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.	Satisfactorily summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.	Thoroughly summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.
6. Include a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Insufficiently Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Partially Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Satisfactorily Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Thoroughly Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.
7. Two (2) References provided. Weight: 5%	No references provided.	Insufficiently included the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Partially included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Satisfactorily included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Thoroughly included required number of references; all references high quality choices.
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 20%	More than 8 errors present.	7-8 errors present.	5-6 errors present.	3-4 errors present.	0-2 errors present.