philosophy final project
Yujia Liu PHIL 119
2017/3/19 Final Paper Prospectus
Ethical Relationship between Stakeholders and Shareholders
Introduction
For all leaders in companies or organizations, one question is always mentioned – should companies seek only to maximize shareholders value or strive to serve the often-conflicting interests of all stakeholders. Undoubtedly, the answer is no. However, it is also difficult for leaders to find the most suitable way to keep the balance between the two important groups during their administration. This paper will discuss the ethical behaviors of stakeholders and shareholders and then find the ways to maximum the common interests.
Key Points
The accurate definition of stakeholders and shareholders and the accurate duties for each group.
Ethical behavior built by each side during the business relationships
Discussion and analysis about several business scandals under the ethical stage.
Body of paper
The accurate definition of stakeholders and shareholders and the accurate duties for each group.
Stakeholders - A person, group or organization that has interest or concern in an organization. Stakeholders can affect or be affected by the organization's actions, objectives and policies. Some examples of key stakeholders are creditors, directors, employees, owners (shareholders), suppliers.
Shareholders - An individual, group, or organization that owns one or more shares in a company, and in whose name the share certificate is issued.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/shareholder.html
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/stakeholder.html
Ethical behavior built by each side during the business relationships
Business ethics and customer stakeholders
https://danielsethics.mgt.unm.edu/pdf/Customer%20Stakeholders.pdf
http://businesscasestudies.co.uk/primark/engaging-with-stakeholders/customers-and-shareholders.html
The ethical responsibilities in the Employer-Employee relationship
http://josephsononbusinessethics.com/2010/12/responsibilities-employer-employee-relationship/
https://www.allbusiness.com/ethics-and-people-management-2975409-1.html
http://catalogue.pearsoned.ca/assets/hip/ca/hip_ca_pearsonhighered/samplechapter/0131245228.pdf
Balance between managers and shareholders.
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/managers-goals-vs-shareholders-goals-38807.html
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/conflicts-between-corporate-management-shareholders-75063.html
https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/shareholders_vs_management_split_decision
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-business/
Ethical issues with suppliers
https://www.cips.org/Documents/About%20CIPS/Ethical_Bus_Prac%20printed.pdf
http://www.mypurchasingcenter.com/purchasing/industry-articles/ethics-issues-prevail-supply-chain-management/
http://www.supplychainbrain.com/content/research-analysis/chainlink-research/single-article-page/article/ethics-issues-are-at-the-heart-of-supply-chain-management-1/
http://ism.files.cms-plus.com/About/principlesandstandardsguidelines.pdf
Discussion and analysis about several business scandals under the ethical stage
Toshiba’s accounting scandal
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081315/toshibas-accounting-scandal-how-it-happened.asp
FIFA’s RICO problem
https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/19/issue/23/fifa-corruption-scandal-perspective-public-international-law
Goldman Sachs employee uses stolen confidential materials
http://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2015/10/28/a-scheming-employee-just-cost-goldman-sachs-50.html
The dirty business of oil and gas
http://www.foe.org/system/storage/877/c2/f/561/Dirty_Business_TransCanada_Web.pdf
Millions of kids’ personal data hacked
http://fortune.com/2015/11/30/vtech-hacking-children-data/
Exxon Mobil deliberately misleads the public about climate change
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/06/science/exxon-mobil-under-investigation-in-new-york-over-climate-statements.html?_r=0
Volkswagen cheats emission tests
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772
Turing Pharmaceuticals jacks up prices.
https://qz.com/611347/martin-shkreli-has-fallen-from-grace-but-his-former-firm-is-still-charging-sky-high-prices/
Conclusion – It is important to realize that the balance between shareholder and stakeholder still cannot be completely controlled under any business circumstances, because there are too many components in the general environment that varies suddenly in most time. Neither shareholder primacy nor stakeholder theory is plausibly interpreted as the view that corporate managers should do whatever is possible to maximize shareholder wealth and balance all stakeholders’ interests, respectively. Rather, these views should be interpreted as views that managers should do whatever is morally permissible to achieve these ends. A large part of business ethics is trying to determine what morality permits in this domain.
3