Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 1

The variable used in the analysis is “Friendly Employees”. An independent sample t-test is conducted to compare, “friendly employees,” between Jose’s South-western Café(M=4.80,SD=0.489) and Santa Fe Grill(M=2.94,S.D=0.947).The result showed significant difference in the ,”Friendly Employee” between Jose Southwestern Café and Santa Fe Grill with t-value of t(395.25) =26.025 with the p-value being 0.000.

Group Statistics

Favorite Mexican Restaurant

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

X12 -- Friendly Employees

Jose's Southwestern Cafe

152

4.80

.489

.040

Santa Fe Grill

253

2.94

.947

.060

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F

Sig.

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

X12 -- Friendly Employees

Equal variances assumed

178.737

.000

22.494

403

.000

1.862

.083

1.699

2.025

Equal variances not assumed

26.025

395.295

.000

1.862

.072

1.721

2.003

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 2

Answer

The variable used in the analysis is “Satisfaction”. An independent sample t-test is conducted to compare, “Satisfaction,” between Jose’s South-western Café(M=5.31,SD=1.141) and Santa Fe Grill(M=4.54,S.D=1.002).The result showed significant difference in the ,”Satisfaction” between Jose Southwestern Café and Santa Fe Grill with t-value of t(286.47) =6.86 with the p-value being 0.000.

Group Statistics

Favorite Mexican Restaurant

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

X22 -- Satisfaction

Jose's Southwestern Cafe

152

5.31

1.141

.093

Santa Fe Grill

253

4.54

1.002

.063

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F

Sig.

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

X22 -- Satisfaction

Equal variances assumed

3.957

.047

7.085

403

.000

.768

.108

.555

.981

Equal variances not assumed

6.860

286.468

.000

.768

.112

.547

.988

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 3

The variable is the,” Likely to return”. The likelihood of returning to Santa Fe Grill and Jose’s Southwestern Café was found out using cross-tab in SPSS. The result showed 0% are highly likely to return to Santa Fe Grill whereas 6.6% are highly likely to return to Jose’s Southwestern Café. It is further evident from the stacked bar graph as shown below. The mean value for Jose’s Southwestern café,” likely to return” obtained was 4.96 with SD =1.291, whereas for Jose’s South Western café, “likely to return” was 4.17 with SD =0.848.

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid

Missing

Total

N

Percent

N

Percent

N

Percent

Favorite Mexican Restaurant * X23 -- Likely to Return

405

100.0%

0

0.0%

405

100.0%

Favorite Mexican Restaurant * X23 -- Likely to Return Cross tabulation

X23 -- Likely to Return

Total

2

3

4

5

6

Highly Likely

Favorite Mexican Restaurant

Jose's Southwestern Cafe

Count

0

28

35

14

65

10

152

% within Favorite Mexican Restaurant

0.0%

18.4%

23.0%

9.2%

42.8%

6.6%

100.0%

Santa Fe Grill

Count

6

48

104

88

7

0

253

% within Favorite Mexican Restaurant

2.4%

19.0%

41.1%

34.8%

2.8%

0.0%

100.0%

Total

Count

6

76

139

102

72

10

405

% within Favorite Mexican Restaurant

1.5%

18.8%

34.3%

25.2%

17.8%

2.5%

100.0%

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 4

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 5

The variable used are as follows:

  • Try New and Different Thing-X1

  • Buy New Products-X9

  • Try New Brands-X11

The descriptive statistics table shows man value of X1 being 5.39 with SD=1.863.The mean value of X9= 5.60 with SD= 1.606 and mean of X11 = 5.42 with SD =1.766.

A bivariate correlation test was used to compare the relationship among items X1,X9 and X11.The result showed the correlation between r(X1,X9)= 0.688,p= 0.000.Thus,positive significant correlation exists between X1 and X9.

The correlation coefficient between X1 and X11,r(X1,X11)=0.844,p-value =0.000.A positive and significant correlation exists between X1 and X11.

The correlation coefficient between X9 and X11,r(X9,X11)=0.693,p-value =0.000.A positive and significant correlation exists between X9 and X11.

Here positive correlation means increase in value of one of the variable causes an increase in another variable.

Report

X1 -- Try New and Different Things

X9 -- Buy New Products

X11 -- Try New Brands

Mean

5.39

5.60

5.42

405

405

405

Std. Deviation

1.863

1.606

1.766

Correlations

X1 -- Try New and Different Things

X9 -- Buy New Products

X11 -- Try New Brands

X1 -- Try New and Different Things

Pearson Correlation

1

.688**

.844**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

405

405

405

X9 -- Buy New Products

Pearson Correlation

.688**

1

.693**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

405

405

405

X11 -- Try New Brands

Pearson Correlation

.844**

.693**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

.000

405

405

405

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 6

Answer

The variable is ,”Distance Driven”.which is ordinal.Therefore the appropriate test will be the Mann Whitney U test which is the non-parametric version of independent sample t-test.

The mean rank for distance driven for Jose’s South-western Café is 222.42 whereas the mean rank for Santa Fe Grill obtained is 191.33.The second table showed test statistic value of U=16276.5 with the p-value of 0.006.Further,it was analysed through stacked bar graph which showed large difference in each categories

Ranks

Favorite Mexican Restaurant

N

Mean Rank

Sum of Ranks

x30 -- Distance Driven

Jose's Southwestern Cafe

152

222.42

33807.50

Santa Fe Grill

253

191.33

48407.50

Total

405

Test Statisticsa

x30 -- Distance Driven

Mann-Whitney U

16276.500

Wilcoxon W

48407.500

-2.754

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

.006

a. Grouping Variable: Favorite Mexican Restaurant

Stacked Bar graph

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 7

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 8

The variable is ,”Distance Driven”.which is ordinal.Therefore the appropriate test will be the Mann Whitney U test which is the non-parametric version of independent sample t-test.

The mean rank for distance driven for Jose’s South-western Café is 222.42 whereas the mean rank for Santa Fe Grill obtained is 191.33.The second table showed test statistic value of U=16276.5 with the p-value of 0.006.Further,it was analysed through stacked bar graph which showed large difference in each categories

Ranks

Favorite Mexican Restaurant

N

Mean Rank

Sum of Ranks

X34 -- Age

Jose's Southwestern Cafe

152

163.54

24857.50

Santa Fe Grill

253

226.71

57357.50

Total

405

Test Statisticsa

X34 -- Age

Mann-Whitney U

13229.500

Wilcoxon W

24857.500

-5.696

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

a. Grouping Variable: Favorite Mexican Restaurant

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 9

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 10

Answer

The variable Healthy_Food was computed by adding the following variable:

  • X4-Avoid Fried Foods

  • X8-Eat balanced Nutritious Meals

  • X10-Careful about what I eat

The mean value for Jose’s Southwestern Café obtained was 10.73 with SD =2.23 whereas the mean value of Santa Fe Grill obtained was 14.54 with SD =3. 002.An independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean difference between Jose’s Southwestern Café and Santa Fe Grill with respect to Healthy Food. The result showed test statistic value of t (385) = -14.56 with the p-value of 0. 000.Thus the difference is significant between Jose’s Southwestern Café and Santa Fe Grill with respect to Healthy_Food.

Group Statistics

Favorite Mexican Restaurant

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Healthy_Food

Jose's Southwestern Cafe

152

10.7303

2.23153

.18100

Santa Fe Grill

253

14.5375

3.00191

.18873

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F

Sig.

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

Healthy_Food

Equal variances assumed

19.707

.000

-13.546

403

.000

-3.80729

.28106

-4.35981

-3.25476

Equal variances not assumed

-14.560

385.080

.000

-3.80729

.26150

-4.32142

-3.29315

Urgent SPSS Case Analysis-Needs Fixing 11

Answer

The regression model for Santa Fe customers was developed considering the following variables:

Dependent Variable:X22-Satisfaction

Independent Variable:X12-Friendly Employees, X14-Large Size Portions, X15-Fresh Food.

The first table shows coefficient of determination being R-square = 0.629 meaning 62.9% of the variation in satisfaction is explained by variable, X12(friendly employees), X14(Large Size Portions) and X15(Fresh Food).

The second table shows whether the overall regression model is significant or not. The result shows F-value of F (3,249) =141.017 with the p-value of 0.000 meaning the overall regression is significant.

The third table is the individual independent variable interpretation.

The model can be represented as

----------------------- (1)

From the above model it is clear increase in 1 unit of friendly employees cause an increase of 0.436 unit of satisfaction. The test statistic obtained is t =9.999 with p-value =0.000.

The equation (1) shows that unit increase of,” Large Size Portions” cause an increase of 0.123 increase of satisfaction. The test statistic obtained is t =4.293 with p-value =0.000, meaning the slope is significant.

The equation (1) shows that unit increase of,” Fresh food” cause an increase of 0.559 increase of satisfaction. The test statistic obtained is t =15.403 with p-value =0.000, meaning the slope is significant.

The most important variable would be the variable that brings the most satisfaction per unit increase in independent variable. It can be obtained from the standardized coefficient of the regression(beta). Thus from the above regression model it is clear that the most important variable is,” Fresh food-X15(beta=0.649)” and the least important variable is.” Large Portion-X14(beta=0.182)”.

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

.793a

.629

.625

.613

a. Predictors: (Constant), X15 -- Fresh Food, X12 -- Friendly Employees, X14 -- Large Size Portions

ANOVAa

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Regression

159.145

3

53.048

141.017

.000b

Residual

93.670

249

.376

Total

252.814

252

a. Dependent Variable: X22 -- Satisfaction

b. Predictors: (Constant), X15 -- Fresh Food, X12 -- Friendly Employees, X14 -- Large Size Portions











Coefficients

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

(Constant)

-.242

.238

-1.016

.311

X12 -- Friendly Employees

.436

.044

.412

9.999

.000

X14 -- Large Size Portions

.123

.029

.182

4.293

.000

X15 -- Fresh Food

.559

.036

.649

15.403

.000

a. Dependent Variable: X22 -- Satisfaction