Review 2 Rough Draft Papers per Rhubric and 1 Paper

Peer Review

Review the rough drafts from fellow students using the RHUBRIC GUIDELINES BELOW AND GIVE A SCORE WITH SOME COMMENTS FOR EACH PARAMETER. The rough drafts are attached and labeled as “Rough Draft to Review 1” and “Rough Draft to Review 2”.


A few parameters (RHUBRIC TO FOLLOW IS BELOW):


    • Your individual rough drafts should have already been submitted in the “Rough Draft” forum in week five.

    • Choose two different rough drafts to evaluate (when possible, please choose the drafts you will review that have not been reviewed by your classmates or that only have one review.  By doing this, we can better ensure that each of your fellow students has at least one peer review on his or her work—simply put, choose carefully; don’t just pick the first two drafts you see).

    • Each of these reviews should have your feedback provided in a Word or Open Office Document. Utilize the provided rubric (linked above) and include this with your constructive feedback, incorporating specific, positive remarks as well as helpful suggestions so your peer is able to see you genuinely evaluated their rough draft.

    • You will provide this feedback as a reply to each of your two peers within this Peer Review Drop Box which will then be graded upon the close of this week.

Peer Review Evaluation Rubric

Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria.

5-7 pages (approximately 1000-1250 words) in length 15

A clear thesis statement 15

Body supports claims presented 15

45

Clearly presents well-reasoned ideas and concepts.

Used 10 reputable sources 30

30

Quality of Writing

Academic and professional appearance (APA formatting) 15

Grammar and proofreading 10

25

Total

100