Weekly Assignment

Discussion 2

 Case Study: Ethic of Critique

In this discussion, you again have the opportunity to debate a case study from stakeholder perspectives. As with the similar Week One discussion, you assume the role of your assigned stakeholder within the case and write your initial response and those to your peers from the perspective of that stakeholder. To prepare for this discussion, read the Case Study 4.3: Culturally Responsive Curriculum or an Ethical Dilemma (Poliner Shapiro & Stefkovich, 2011, p. 53-56). Next, review the initial post and guided response instructions making sure you respond from your assigned stakeholder’s perspective.  One approach to this discussion is to create your viewpoint with consideration of the Questions for Discussion presented in the text following the case study.

NOTE: Case study is attached as a separate document
Initial Post: Create your initial post writing from your assigned stakeholder’s perspective. Discuss the case from the viewpoint of your stakeholder considering the dilemma presented and making sure you have taken a clearly articulated ethical stance on the case’s dilemma and including any legal considerations involved.  If you are assigned the leader’s perspective, be sure to include a suggested decision for the outcome of the case.   
Determine your stakeholder role assignment as follows: 

If your last name begins with letters R-Z, write from the perspective of Harold Standing Elk (parent) OR Jeremy Standing Elk (student).