Provide Part II of Team Work


Executive Summary Grading Guide

HRM/326 Version 4

2




Learning Team Assignment: Executive Summary

Purpose of Assignment


The purpose of this assignment is for students to develop an organizational mentoring program to improve career development. A successful mentoring program provides students an opportunity to explore the main concepts of mentoring and how to describe the process of program development, creating buy-in from leadership, and demonstrating the ability to create training forms to conduct a mentoring program.


Grading Guide – Week Five

Content

70 Percent

Met

Partially Met

Not Met

Comments:

The team provides a summary outlining the reasons why a company of their choice should invest in a mentoring program.

1.30 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

The team provides a needs analysis assessment and outcome for a mentoring program.


1.30 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

The team determines if the mentoring program will be formal or informal.


1.30 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

The team determines when the organization will realize the return on investment.

1.30 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

The team evaluates any legal considerations of the program.

1.30 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

The team conducts a SWOT analysis that summarizes the benefits and risks of a mentoring program.

1.50 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

The team determines how the program will be measured.

1 maximum point

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

The team creates three one page forms:

  • Mentor and Mentee roles and responsibilities

  • Mentor first meeting check list and meeting guide

  • Mentee first meeting check list and meeting guide

Please be sure the forms are properly formatted where the information is clear and reflects the above information as required.

1.50 maximum points (.50 points per form)

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

Total Available

Total Earned

10.5

Writing Guidelines

30 Percent

Met

Partially Met

Not Met

Comments:

The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements.

.90 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page.

.90 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper.

.90 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.

.90 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation.

.90 maximum points

Points will be calculated and distributed based on level met.

Total Available

Total Earned

 

4.5

Assignment Total

#

15

Additional comments:

Copyright © 2016 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.