3 pages analysis of interviews
| This paper… | 5 = Excellent 1 = Poor or missing | Comments: |
| Clearly states purpose of paper: To analyze the results from the interviews (4 interviews) using at least ONE theory, concept, or model from the course *see last item of rubric below | ||
| Outlines clear organization of paper in the introductory paragraph | ||
| Demonstrates proper grammar, word usage and mechanics | ||
| Overviews the demographic segments interviewed and interesting findings from the interviews (perhaps compares/contrasts them) | ||
| Consistent in use of correct in-text citation formatting (all information is attributed to source(s) and author(s)) and a reference page (works cited) is included at end | ||
| Explains and connects at least one course theory(ies), concept(s), or model(s) to the “findings” from the four interviews to help in analysis | ||
| Shows understanding of at least one of the concepts, models, and theory(ies) discussed in class and in course readings | ||
| Develops educated conclusions about the findings from the four interviews and explains how theory helps in understanding the findings | ||
| Includes relevant facts and evidence to support conclusions, but avoids use of overly long quotes to replace critical thinking and analysis | ||
| *Analysis helped the reader consider how and why people from different demographic segments may (or may not) share information and their level trust in their use of social networking sites | ||
| Other notes: |
