Job Description-AssignmentChapter # 6 60 Points You are responsible for developing a job description and three (3) interview questions to be used to fill the position. The agency is an internationall

Job Description Assignment-Rubric

Requirement Total Possible Points Points Earned

Content (43) ( )

	Exceed Expectations 38-43 Points	Meets Expectations 37-30	Minimally Meets Expectations 29-16	Insufficient Below 15 points
Content: 43 pts possible
Title (3)	Provided a creative job title but still included the most critical information for the applicant	Provided a professional job title which included the most pertinent information for the applicant.	Provided a job title with the most important information	Failed to provide a job title.
Summary of Position (6)	Concise, clearly written, easy to read, and explanatory of the position.	Clearly written, included all of the critical information, and highlighted many of the duties of the position.	Clearly written, included all of the critical information, and highlighted many of the duties of the position. The summary very lengthy and difficult to follow.	Nice attempt; however, too lengthy, wordy, and unclear as to primary responsibilities of the position.
Detailed Job Duties (5)	Extensive list of job responsibilities/duties necessary to perform the position. All indicated relevance for carrying out the duties of the position.	Provided adequate list of job responsibilities and related the relevance to the position	Had an adequate list of job responsibilities; however, many would be non-essential for this position.	Had limited job responsibilities identified and most were non-essential for this position
Agency Goals (6)	All of the stated goals followed the SMART guidelines for agency design and were in line with the stated agency.	At least two of the stated goals followed the SMART guidelines of agency design and were in line with the stated agency.	Made an effort to align goals with the SMART guidelines but was not completely successful. A majority of the goals were clearly written but not feasible for the agency	The goals were not feasible, adequate, and functional for the stated agency. Were unclear and did not appear to be able to guide the agency.
Credentials (5)	Created an exhaustive, creditable list of required/preferred credentials	Presented an adequate list of creditable required/preferred credentials to perform the task of the job presented by the student.	Gave minimal credentials of the position ( 1 or 2).	Either failed to address the credentials or the credentials required or preferred did not match the stated job description provided by the student.
Education (3)	Created an exhaustive, creditable list of required/preferred and related educational background that might be an asset in the position.	Created an adequate, creditable list of required/preferred and related field educational background that might be an asset in the position.	Identified only minimal educational degrees or background.	Failed to address educational qualifications at all in the job description.
Organizational/Managerial Skills (10)	Created an exhaustive, creditable list of required/preferred and related skill sets that would be an asset in the position.	Created an adequate, creditable list of required/preferred and related skill sets that would be an asset in the position.	Identified only minimal skill sets that would be of benefit for an applicant to hold in this position.	Skills sets identified were basic skills and not truly identified and managerial type skills.
Work Experience (5)	Provided clear guidelines for types of work experience that would be considered for this position. Was creative in the various types of work experience that might qualify one for this position.	Provided clear guidelines for types of work experience that would be considered for this position.	Provided very broad guidelines for types of work experience that would be considered for this position.	Failed to address the type of work experience the position might consider.

Interview Questions (6) ( )

Exceed Expectations

5-6

Meets Expectations

4-5

Minimally Meets Expectations

2-3

Insufficient

0-1

Interview Questions (6)

Questions were formed well, addressed the deeper demands of the job and qualifications of the applicant.

Questions targeted the individual’s qualities, and fitness for the position.

Made an attempt to address the individuals qualities; however, the wording was questionable as to how the applicant could answer. The questions were unethical

Only superficial/basic questions were provided. Questions were unethical.

Writing Proficiency 11 Points ( )

	Exceed Expectations 9-11 Points	Meets Expectations 7-9	Minimally Meets Expectations 4-7	Insufficient 0-4
Writing Proficiency (11)
Grammar/English Structure (5)	No grammatical or structural errors were noted. Organizational flow was superb.	Only a few minor grammatical errors were noted.	Contained several grammatical errors making the material difficult to read; appears not proofing was conducted.	Grammatical errors made the document almost unreadable. Not at graduate work level.
Format/Appearance (5)	Extremely professional, ready for publication	We a few adjustments would be ready for publication.	Appearance was un professional and cluttered.	Very cluttered, difficult to follow and read.
Cover Sheet (1)	Had all of the required APA cover sheet information in the correct format	Had a majority of the required APA cover sheet format.	Had the required information but not in the correct APA format	Did not attempt to produce an APA formatted cover sheet.