"As the Ford Pinto case showed, cost-benefit analysis is fundamentally flawed as a way of making ethical decisions in business.

"As the Ford Pinto case showed, cost-benefit analysis is fundamentally flawed as a way of making ethical decisions in business."

Present the case for and against this argument drawing on both the Pinto case and other relevant business ethics decisions. What conclusions do you reach based on this discussion?

The question can be answered with the definition of utiitarianism cost benefit approach and its pros and cons using the example of ford pinto and other relevant decisions that were taken with utilitarianism.