Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
1. PLEASE ANSWER PROBLEMS 19 and 25. (page 502 -503) Attached2. PLEASE SUMMARIZE ONE CASE FROM THE CHAPTER ( in the proper format)(page 492-499) Attachedi. THE FACTS OF THE CASEii THE ISSUE AT THE LAW
1. PLEASE ANSWER PROBLEMS 19 and 25. (page 502 -503) Attached
2. PLEASE SUMMARIZE ONE CASE FROM THE CHAPTER ( in the proper format)
(page 492-499) Attached
i. THE FACTS OF THE CASE
ii THE ISSUE AT THE LAW THE COURT IS CONSIDERING
iii. HOW THE LAW WAS APPLIED IN THIS CASE
iv. CONCLUSION OF THE COURT
3. PLEASE PROVIDE ME WITH AN ARTICLE OR A PERSONAL EXPERIENCE REGARDING PRODUCTS LIABILITY ISSUES MENTIONED IN THE CHAPTER (article summary and link!)(Summary at least one substantive paragraph) Attached
Cite all references
- @
- 1030 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $20.00. See answer's preview
**** of ******************* ** Affiliation:Question 19Robinson ** not likely ** be ********** **** *** ******* *** branch will *** *** ***** is” disclaimer ** ***** *** ******* *** ********** implies that ******** purchased the ***** *** ******** it with *** ****** ** the **** As **** ******** ** *** going ** ******* *** any ******* ** ******* contract for ********** **** existed ****** *** ******** ** *** ***** *** **** way ******** *** overcome *** ***** ***** disclaimer ** if ** *** ***** *** presence ** fraud ******* **** ** ****** ******** since ****** *** ******** on *** to inspect *** truck several ***** before *** ***** ***************** 20Perfect ******** *** liable ** *** ********* under strict liability ***** they are the ************ ** the ******* The theory ** strict liability ********** *** **** ** prove **** *** ********* ***** **** ***** ** ********** That ******* **** ******* ******** ** ****** **** when ** **** *** *** required *** **** ** ************* *** ******* *** ********* **** **** **** ** ***** **** * ****** ******* ***** **** *** ******* ************ dangerous ******* to *** ********* ***** ******* ******* **** has the ******* ** ********** ** **** ***** is not *********** *** *** **** ** ** ********** ** prove **** the plaintiff was ******** ** *** *** ***** ** ***** the dollQuestion **** will win the **** ** *** ****** of ****** liability ** ********** to the case *** theory ** strict ********* ******** that the ********* ****** ***** **** *** product *** ********* ** *** **** the ********* ****** prove **** the ******* *** ********* The reason *** *** ******** was ****** *** ** *** ****** ********* *** the ***** ** **** ** **** *** *** ******* ** ******* **** to win the case GE *** **** that ***** ****** **** safety ******* **** ** *** ****** *** *** ******** ***** ** *** ***** ******* ****** latches *** ******** therefore **** *** ***** ** purchasing *** ***** and accepted ** ** ** wasQuestion ***** **** ******** *** ***** ***** ** *** *** consider *** the facts ** the case ***** ******** **** be largely ********** by *** **** for *** manufacturer ** ******** *** care ** ***** ******* ******* there is ** element ** the assumed **** **** *** **** seems ** ****** Federal ****** a disclaimer ** ******* and even wrote ** ** the machine Heckman in purchasing *** ******* ******** *** risk *** even ********* a ***** proving **** he ********** *** risks ******* **** ****** **** ****** its intentions ** *** not ******** ** insert ****** during *** ************* ******* *** ** the *********** ******* uses Provided *** facts ** ******* risks *** *** **** ** *********** ** ********** *** ****** ******* ****** *** its ************** 23The ******* **** *** *** **** ***** ***** were no ******** product ******** on the items ******* ********* **** **** **** *** defendant ****** ** **** ** not provide ******** ** their ******** *** company ****** ** **** that *** ***** *********** ** the pipe will **** ** **** *** ******** or ************ *** also ******** ** ** *********** to *** ********* *** company needs ** write its ************ in a font *** color **** is ****** visible to *** consumer *** ********* ****** ** ** ** ***** ** *** **** *** ******** **** was **** ** *** *** instructions ******** that **** **** *** ******************* ************ **** ** both ****** under *** ******** *** ****** ********* clause *** ******* made ******* and ******* a warranty that *** chick ******** would ***** **** eggs for *** customer *** ********* *** not able ** ******* **** ******* ***** their chicks were ** ******** quality *** ** their ******* *** plaintiff **** **** ***** ***** strict ********* that *** product ***** was defective ********** **** *** be able to *** *** ******* **** ***** it *** *** ******** to ********* *** disease ** *** young chicksQuestion 25The defendants *** ****** an ******* ******** ** *** ********* as ********* ** ***** *********** ********* *** ************** ****** **** the ********* ***** *** ** ******* ** *** ******* condition ***** ***** *** ******** ** ******* **** their ******** **** healthy *** *** ****** ****** ** **** ** continue ******* ***** *** plaintiff’s wife became **** **** ***** ***** products *** ********** **** ** ****** ** ***** ******* ***************** summaryi The ***** ** *** caseThe ***** laid ** *** **** ** * **** of communication and ******* ** ****** **** the ******* quality ************* failure ** ****** **** the express ******** **** *** been ********* ****** *** ********* ************ *** ***** ** *** *** *** ***** ** ****************** Belden ********** *** express ******** **** *** **** agreed **** ********** Belden complied with *** ******* ************ of the ********* *** *** law *** ******* ** **** ********* ** *** ********* the ***** *********** that *** ********** ** ******* *** ******* ******* **** not ******* **** both Belden *** *** *** ** come to a ****** understanding regarding *** ***** ***** Belden *** AEC *** *** **** * ******* ************* concerning *** ***** the court ***** *** **** the ******* ********** in *** **** **** *** ********** ********* use ** ******* ********** as *** ********* did not affect *** product ***** **** **** there *** a ****** ***** *** *** parties *** not communicate or **** raise the ***** ***** *** a **** *** **** ** come ** * common **************** *** ********** ** *** ******** ***** ********* **** *** ******* ** *** ** **** merchant ************ ***** **** **** were also ****** *** ******* ******** *** damages ***** *** be ****** **** *** *** ******* ****** come ** a ****** ************** ******** ************ **** ** ****** and *** ** * ******* ******* ** product ********* Product ********* ****** when ***** ** a failure ** **** ********* obligations **** AEC *** entering * ******** with Belden *** requirement was **** *** ******* ******** wires **** ******* Chemical Corp However * ****** ** Dow Chemical ******* *** ************ ****** *** ****** for ******** **** *** *** meet the ********* *********** The ************ ** *** wires supplied ** ****** ** *** were ******** vehicles **** **** *** ** **** ******* The ******* *** ** ****** *** *** ************ ******** *** ****** ***** ** turn ******** ** ******* ******* ****** *** ****** *** ******** ******** **** *** *** **** *** expected quality as ********
