13–2 mitigation of damages. lauren barton, a single mother with three children, lived in portland, oregon. cynthia vanhorn also lived in oregon until she moved to new york city to open and operate a

13–2 mitigation of damages. lauren barton, a single mother with three children, lived in portland, oregon. cynthia vanhorn also lived in oregon until she moved to new york city to open and operate an art gallery. vanhorn asked barton to manage the gallery under a one-year contract for an annual salary of $72,000. to begin work, barton relocated to new york. as part of the move, barton transferred custody of her children to her husband, who lived in london, england. in accepting the job, barton also forfeited her husband's alimony and child-support payments, including unpaid amounts of nearly $30,000. before barton started work, vanhorn repudiated the contract. unable to find employment for more than an annual salary of $25,000, barton moved to london to be near her children. barton filed a suit in an oregon state court against vanhorn, seeking damages for breach of contract. should the court hold, as vanhorn argued, that barton did not take reasonable steps to mitigate her damages? why or why not?