Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
2page
For this Assignment, you will be exploring the differences between state and federal jurisdiction in criminal prosecutions with respect to crimes against persons. The primary objective of this Assignment is to explain how the same conduct may be prosecuted either in state or federal court pursuant to applicable state and federal statutes. Be sure to select a crime against person, such as certain types of sexual assault or kidnapping.
You are to identify ONE specific crime, a crime against a person, and describe the following:
- Create the factual scenario giving rise to the criminal prosecution in either state or federal court.
- Indicate the name of the specific crime which may be prosecuted in federal court based on the scenario and provide the definition of that crime, including a citation or reference to the applicable statute.
- Similarly, indicate the name of the crime which may be prosecuted based upon the same conduct in a state court. Be sure to identify the state statute, and as you did in #2, define the crime and provide a citation to the authority.
- Explain a cultural factor that may influence how the crime may be prosecuted. A cultural factor might include a person’s socio-economic, ethnic or religious background; in your response, discuss how various cultures might interpret the wording of two statutes differently. Be sure to discuss how one culture might view a crime differently than another, based on the culture’s particular viewpoints.
Your paper should be written in APA format with a length not to exceed 2 pages (excluding cover and reference pages).
- @
- 165 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $15.00. See answer's preview
*********** *** *** ***** ** courts in **** nation * ***** ****** and ********** ****** ****** ***** ** ** examination ** key contrasts ******* the state *** ********** court ********************** of ***** *** ******* ************* and ************ ****** are *** ** by * ***** ******* states there *** ************ ****** ****** **** *** *** up ** ***** *********** ********* *** different regions ***** we are ************* **** the ******* ********* ** ***** ******* Government ****** *** set up ***** the ** ************ to ****** ******** including *** ************ *** laws ** ** Congress Purview ** ***** *** ******* Courts The ********* ******* government and ***** ****** *** ************* for *** **** **** ** ******* ****** ******* ** *** ***** ** cases * ***** is ******** ** ************* courts **** wide ****** so the ***** singular ******* *** **** ** *** *** to ** required in * for ******* burglaries ***** criminal offenses broken ********* and ****** debate * *** ******** attempted in ***** ****** *** **** ***** state ****** *** *** permitted ** hear *** ****** ******* *** ****** ****** *** those ********* ******* ********** government ***** ******** antitrust ******* ** ****** copyright *** **** ******* ***************** ***** ******* ** ********** is restricted ** *** sorts ** cases ******** in *** ************ *** particularly ************ by ******** ********* government courts **** listen: Cases ** ***** the ****** ****** ** * ***************** ********* ************ ** *** ** Constitution ** government **** ****** ******* ******** **************** between ******* ** ******* states if *** *** ** discussion ********* ****** ****** ******** qualities ****** and Chapter ** ********* patent *** ******* *** cases Sometimes **** ********** *** ***** ****** **** ****** **** permits gatherings to **** ******* to ** to ***** ***** ** ** ********** court Criminal ***** ** ***** *** ******* Court Most criminal cases ******* ************ of ***** *** *** *** ********* ** ***** court *** ******** ***** ********* ********** **** *** ** ********* **** ** ******* court ** ** * ***** know *** instance that ******** is * ********** *** what *** **** ** ** * *********** ******* ***** laws not ********** **** **** ******** a wrongdoing ***** *** **** * couple ** ********** laws about ***** *** ******* the *** **** ***** ** ** ******* ********** ** ******* * **** ***** ****** *** ********** by ** ******* ****** ***** ** ***** ********** *********** *** ******** illicit *********** **** *** nation ** crosswise over state ***** *** *********** ** *** US sends ** cheat purchasers *********** ********* on ********** ******** **** ******* national parks ** ******** reservations) are ************ arraigned in ******* court State Laws *** *** ******* ************************ ****** may hear cases ********** state **** ** the ***** is whether the ***** *** ****** the ******* ************ Assume a ***** *** ********* ********** ********* ******* ** ******* *********** ***** An area affiliation acquires * **** ** ******** state court ******* a ******** who ******** goats ** his ******* At *** ***** **** *** ***** ****** a request ******* a ********** *********** the litigant **** ******* ***** ** the ********** ************ *** ***** *** in government ***** ** ** ******** ************ ** *** ********* ************** *** ***** of ****** *** illicit ***** **** ********** *** ***** **** *** instance government **** ******** **** *********** and the states **** included their *** **** ***** ************ ******** ******** ********** A *** can ** to ********** ** ***** court ** ***** * **** ***** *** elected law ** **** the elected *** ***** **** A state-law-no *** *** **** *** ** ******** **** ***** ************* *** **************** ****** ****** by * **** **** the bigger ****** ** cases *** **** more ******* **** *** ******* ********** than ********** ****** do ** spite ** the **** **** the government courts **** *** less ***** than *** ***** ****** *** cases they ** hear **** *** *** **** ********* ** be ** ******** ************ ***** about *** court ***** *** **** heard *** **** ***** **** are ** ********** ***** ******* ** ***** ** *** fact that *** government laws **** maintain and the elected ****** **** ****** ***** *** ** everybody ** **** ****** ** the point **** state ***** *** ***** ******* ***** ************ ********* ** account ** the character of *** gatherings: *** ******** *** ** ******* case *** ******* ***** ***** ** ***** ** *** **** **** *** result would *** ********* the * huge ****** ** ******** members ReferenceColorado ******** ***** ******** ************** ******* ******** ****** ***** ******** Pub CoGardner T * ***** ******** T M ************** law Belmont *** ********* ******* **********
