3-5 age Assignment: SWOT Analysis and Strategic Plan

READ READ BELOW! I NEED QUALITY WORK THAT ADDRESSES EVERYTHING

Using this information, the Assignment Rubric and the additional resources provided below, develop a 3-5 page (not including title and reference pages) APA formatted paper in a word document such as Microsoft Word. A minimum of 3 outside references must be used.  MUST BE APA format

Select an organization that you have a solid working knowledge of (an employer past or present is recommended) and conduct a SWOT analysis for that organization. Once you identify the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, you should then develop a strategic HRM plan to address one of the identified issues.

Organization is Mount Sinai Hospital of Manhattan in NYC so do SWOT ANALYSIS OF THIS HOSPITAL AS A WHOLE! and answer the questions about the organization

USE THIS LINK TO ADDRESS ALL and the grading system below

https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/swot-analysis-how-to-do-it.html

Each writing assignment is worth a total of 100 points. Please see the grading rubric below for additional detail and feedback on performance.

Criteria

Limited

Marginal

Excellent

APA Format

0 to 3 points

Limited-to-no use of APA guidelines: Paper is missing key elements of an APA formatted paper such as: Title page, in- text citations, References page. Format errors are significant and demonstrate no attempt to follow APA guidelines.

4 to 8 points

Followed some APA guidelines: A few significant citation and/or referencing errors (e.g. separating the author and year when citing, omitting a reference title, journal name, publisher, or year, or parts of the reference are out of order. Student makes attempts at APA format for all areas of the paper. Attempt may contain errors but does not hinder the readability of the paper.

9 to 10 points

Followed APA guidelines: Title page contain perfect or near perfect APA format. In-text citation contain perfect or near perfect APA format. APA citations with no more than minor errors such as including first initials, using “and” rather than & in a parenthetical citation, and using et al. in the first citation with 3- 5 authors. Reference page contains perfect or minimum APA references errors. Puts exact words of authors in quotation marks with name, year, and page number included. Spacing is used correctly for references and paper structure.

Mechanics (free of grammatical, spelling and/or typographical errors, thoughts well-articulated and clearly presented)

0 to 3 points

Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization

4 to 8 points

Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized

9 to 10 points

Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized

Focus of Topic

0 to 15 points

Lacks clear focus or topic. Missing support and analysis of issue.

16 to 29 points

Focus is somewhat clear and connects to the established topic. Submission lacks clear analysis or support to fully examine the scope of the required assignment.

30 to 35 points

Submission has an intentional focus relevant to the area of study: Focus is clear and well-established throughout the paper. Supporting research is synthesized and used appropriately to establish relevance and support within the paper. In-depth discussion and analysis of the topic are provided.

Depth of analysis, critical thinking and originality of thought

0 to 15 points

Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument

16 to 29 points

Supports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective

30 to 35 points

Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective

Connections

0 to 3 points

Made no connections. Lacked any elaboration.

4 to 6 points

Marginal connections: Made some connections. Minimal elaboration.

7  to 10 points

Integrated new knowledge with prior knowledge and extended or related it to conditions within an organization or system: Made connections with current practice, prior knowledge, or other professional experiences. Made connections with relevant ideas and issues applicable to professional settings.