3) Kant focused on the intentions behind your actions when assessing the morality of the act, while Bentham and Mill focused on the consequences of your act when assessing it's moral worth. Of the two

3) Kant focused on the intentions behind your actions when assessing the morality of the act, while Bentham and Mill focused on the consequences of your act when assessing it's moral worth. Of the two, consequences and intentions, which do you think is more important when it comes time to assess the morality of actions? Do good intentions save a bad outcome, or vice versa? Make sure to provide some clear and specific examples in your explanation. Also note that while it's possible to look at both intentions and consequences, for any act it looks like we can only really prioritize one of those.

Forum Guidelines:

Each week, the initial forum response is due by Thursday at 11:55 p.m. EST and must be 250+ words in length