Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
BI PowerPoint Presentation Review different available BI tools and choose one to investigate in detail. Create a PowerPoint Presentation summarizing the tool and include the following details: What is the purpose of the tool? What features does the tool
BI PowerPoint Presentation
Review different available BI tools and choose one to investigate in detail.
- Create a PowerPoint Presentation summarizing the tool and include the following details:
- What is the purpose of the tool?
- What features does the tool have?
- What industries benefit most from this type of tool?
- What similar tools are available from competing BI solution provides?
- Grid View
- List View
Points Range:0 (0%) - 18 (18%)
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.
Points Range:18.5 (18.5%) - 19 (19%)
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1 or 2 factual errors. Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
Points Range:20 (20%) - 21 (21%)
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Product shows some original thought.
Points Range:22 (22%) - 23 (23%)
Covers topics indepth. Subject knowledge is very good. Work shows new ideas and insights.
Points Range:24 (24%) - 25 (25%)
Covers topic indepth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
OrganizationPoints Range:0 (0%) - 18 (18%)
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just loss of facts. Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.
Points Range:18.5 (18.5%) - 19 (19%)
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization or topics appears flawed. Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.
Points Range:20 (20%) - 21 (21%)
Content is logically organized for the most part with headings or bulleted lists. Makes good use of font, color, graphics, and effects to enhance the presentation, but some slides contain excessive words etc.
Points Range:22 (22%) - 23 (23%)
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize. Makes good use of font,color, graphics, and effects to enhance the presentation. Most slides are not cluttered with excessive words.
Points Range:24 (24%) - 25 (25%)
Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. Product is not cluttered with excessive words etc.
TechnicalPoints Range:0 (0%) - 18 (18%)
Product had major technical difficulties or did not contain any special effects which enhanced the content of the presentation.
Points Range:18.5 (18.5%) - 19 (19%)
Product was basic, linear, and adequate but did not contain any special effects which enhanced the content of the presentation. Product may have had minor technical problems during the presentation.
Points Range:20 (20%) - 21 (21%)
Product was basic, linear, and adequate and contained appropriate clip art, fly-ins, and transitions. Product was relatively free of technical difficulties.
Points Range:22 (22%) - 23 (23%)
Multimedia product included at least one working special effect such as active Internet links, custom animation, original photos, branching etc. which were all appropriate and enhanced the content. Product was relatively free of technical difficulties.
Points Range:24 (24%) - 25 (25%)
Multimedia product included two or more working special effects such as active Internet links, custom animation, original photos, branching etc. which were all appropriate and enhanced the content. Product was free of technical difficulties.
Presentation/Mechanics (Spelling/Grammar/Audio)Points Range:0 (0%) - 18 (18%)
Delivery was not smooth and audience attention often lost. Presentation lacked appropriate voice volume (and eye contact if applicable). Numerous errors in spelling or grammar, sentence structure.
Points Range:18.5 (18.5%) - 19 (19%)
Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. Presentation lacked appropriate voice volume (and/or eye contact if applicable). More than 3 misspelling and/or grammatical errors, sentence structure errors.
Points Range:20 (20%) - 21 (21%)
Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. Presentation was completed with time limit. Three of fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.
Points Range:22 (22%) - 23 (23%)
Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery. Presenter used appropriate voice volume (and/or eye contact if applicable). Presentation was completed within time limit. Minimal errors detected.
Points Range:24 (24%) - 25 (25%)
Well-rehearsed with smooth, creative delivery that engages the audience. Presentation used appropriate voice volume, (and/or eye contact if applicable), gestures, and visual aids. No errors detected.
