Brilliant answers

Below are the criterion that you should use for your critique: Access: * Prepared in HTML (for text, tables and frames) and GIF (graphics) formats * Parts should not take too long to load * Usually possible to reach site * URL for site remains stable; if changed, is hot-linked to new URL Design: *Use should be intuitive * Large or complex pages, typically those larger than 10 screens, should be divided into multiple, smaller files * Images should not be used for pure decoration, but should help convey information * Avoid using client-specific markup so as to be usable by all major clients * Every page should have a short, informative, descriptive title * Documents divided into multiple pages should include document title and publication date at top of each page * Pages should have standard footers, including: * date of last update * email address or link to email form which can be used to contact a responsible party regarding the content of a page * link to appropriate home page * Individual web pages within site are concise * Essential instructions appear before links and interactive portions * If interactions involve private information, they are secure * Documents should be designed to minimize users' reliance on navigational aids (e.g., back and forward buttons, history lists) Content: 2 to 3 pages * Related to function and mission of organization * Scope and limits clearly stated * Headings are clear and descriptive * No use of jargon * Pages organized by needs of user * Content and links suitable to expected audience * Content kept current; out-of-date information removed/updated promptly * Program/project home pages should be linked to sponsoring organization's home page * Care should be taken when linking to sites to ascertain that they do not link to questionable sites * Dead links should be removed or changed promptly * Origin of content documented, verifiable, accurate * Pages should be checked and links verified before made publicly available