Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Case Analysis Burger King, the national franchise, is banned from opening a restaurant within 20 miles of Mattoon, Illinois. So, there is not a Burger King there; no problem, right? Not so fast! In th
Case Analysis
Burger King, the national franchise, is banned from opening a restaurant within 20 miles of Mattoon, Illinois. So, there is not a Burger King there; no problem, right? Not so fast! In the late 1950s, Gene and Betty Hoots trademarked the iconic name. Well, they trademarked it in Illinois at least. When the national company decided to open a chain close by, the Hoots sued and won their case. However, the national chain was able to keep the name Burger King, but the Hoots were also able to keep the name in accordance with the stipulation that the national chain could not open a store within a 20-mile radius of the original store in Mattoon, Illinois.
In a minimum of 500 words, explain the reasons why this decision was made, and discuss the significance of this case in U.S. trademark law jurisprudence.
For this assignment, please find one article that discusses intellectual property; elaborate on how the article relates to the Burger King case to support your answer. Identify the main issues with copyright and trademark in the article, and explain how these issues were either upheld or overturned.
Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased material from the article. Use APA format.
- @
- 1030 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $15.00. See answer's preview
********************** Property RightsName of ******************* ** ************************************* * Burger ******* **** ** ****** v ****** ***** ******** * ******** ** ************ property rights According ** *** ****** ** ****** **** they had ******** *** trademark ******** **** *** enshrined ** the *** ********** the business ** **** ****** *** not as *** the ******** ethics A ***** ********** ***** **** Burger King **** which was * ******** ********* had ******** the ************ ******** by ************* in ***** **** a ******* **** ** the ********** ****** **** ********** *** ********** ********* ***** limited *** ******** ** ******* under its **** ******* *** ******** ** *** ***** to **** in ***** ** **** *** ***** *** based ** the **** **** the *********** *** ******** *** law This *** **** by ********* the ******** ***** * similar **** ** *** competitor *** one *** * registered ********* **** *** **** ************ ** *** ** trademark law ************* as ** shows *** ******** ******** ********* ******** ** operating under * similar name Besides ** ********** *** need for * ********** ** **** within *** ********** ******** ****** ** a result *** business ******** ************ ******** rights ** operating under *** **** of *** competitor ******* **** *** court *** making *** ******** it ***** up ****** **** *** ******* trademark registration had **** ********** **** *** ***** *** ***** ***** **** 1998) In **** a **** the Burger king (giant chain) ******* in ******* *** rights to *** ***** ****** ********* *** ** ***** corpThis has **** *** case **** has **** ** ********** for some years The ******* relates ** **** ** ****** **** ** ** touches ** intellectual property ****** *** ********* ********* The ****** *** trademarks has ******** business ** *** *** ************ ****** ***** ******* ******** *** ******* ***** ***** ***** ***** *** ** ***** Jobs *** Apple Corps *** founded by *** ******* ********* *** ****** *** ********* ** *** to *** ***** business **** *** ********* ** ***** ***** *** an ********* *** **** ******* ******* the *** ********* ***** ***** *** ********* ** *** ******** **** *** **** *** ****** ** ***** cases ******* *** *** companiesAn assessment ***** **** *** ********* (Apple ******* ****** **** *** ******** *** * **** of physical music ************ The ********* ****** ********* on *** ***** hand ****** **** there *** ** ******** way ** ***** ******* ***** of music ***** ** categorized ***** *** previous ********* that *** been ******* ******* *** *** ************* ***** ******* ** *** ******* ****** **** ** *** ** *********** ***** that ********* ** be ********** as *** ***** *** protection ** * ****** ***** *** * need for commerce Apple ******** *** **** trademarked ** **** ***** ***** ***** ******* ********* **** ***** ***** ******** could use the **** in *** **** ** ***** ***** not have *** reasonable **** ** *** ******** environment ******* an ********** of ************ property rights ***** **** ***** **** could **** reduced *** ability ** ***** ***** to *********** **** *********** in the music ******** Necessarily ********* **** in such * ********* were ***** ** ****** **** ***** *** ** ********* by ********* ** *** source ** ******** (Sean ***** The **** of ****** *** ** ****** Corps is **** ** subject ********************************* * * ***** **** * * ****** How ************ Property ******* * Commercial *** ********* ********** *** ******* ******** L ***** ******* (2014) ***** ***** * ***** ******** Intellectual ******** Retrieved ** **** 24 **** **** *********************************************************************************
