Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Choose one diagnosis from the Bipolar and Related Disorders Group American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publi
Choose one diagnosis from the Bipolar and Related Disorders Group
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
- Scan pages 123 through 188
Overview
As you will learn throughout the program, the diagnosis of a variety of psychiatric illnesses is not always an easy or straightforward process. Multiple observations and assessment methods are often employed to reach a diagnosis. This approach can include the use of standardized assessment instruments. This then aids you in defining a treatment plan and choosing specific treatment plans to use in the care of your clients.
You are tasked with identifying a standardized assessment instrument/tool to measure the disorders listed for each week. You will keep these instruments in the form of a “portfolio” that you can use in your clinical practice to assess clients who present with a variety of symptoms.
Instructions:
Instrument/ Tool criteria:
For each assessment, you are tasked with selecting, you will identify an instrument and:
- List what DSM diagnosis the tool/instrument is used for.
- Identify an assessment/diagnosis instrument.
- Appraise a scholarly, peer-reviewed article that addresses the use of the instrument to support your choice as an evidence-based instrument for practice.
- Evaluate the instrument’s appropriateness for diagnosing the condition it is designed to assess or if the developers of the instrument reported that the instrument is only part of a comprehensive assessment for the disorder.
- Describe whether or not the instrument can be used to measure patient response to therapy/treatment or if it is strictly for assessment and diagnosis.
- Discuss the psychometrics/scoring of the instrument, including reliability and validity.
- Discuss any limitations associated with the use of the instrument.
- Include a link to view the assessment if possible.
You can use the following template in completing your portfolio assignments. Your information can be in a bulleted format or just a few sentences for each criterion listed above. However, you must use APA citations.
Clinical Preparation Journal
Review the following resources for the mental status exam:
- PsychPage. (n.d.). How to conduct a mental status exam links to an external site.. http://www.psychpage.com/learning/library/advpract/mse.htm
- Mental Status Exam Handout
Give a summary of the components of the mental status exam. Why is this critical to the care of the mental health patient?
The reflective journal should be substantive, containing a minimum of 500 words. Supporting evidence for your thoughts and ideas should come from a minimum of two scholarly sources. Sources should have in-text citations where appropriate and be referenced on a reference page according to APA 7th Edition standards.
- @
- 156 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $30.00. See answer's preview
****** Status **** JournalA ****** ****** **** (MSE) is ** ******** ********* of *********** assessment given *** ********** evaluation ** * ********* ********** *** cognitive functioning Ergo * ************* *** effective *** ****** consist ** several ***** components **** ******* * *********** *********** ** ** ************** into * ********* ********** appearance ** the **** *********** ******* ** an *** This ************ *** *********** general ******** ***** ******** and ******* *** gait and motor coordination ***** *** **** * physician ******* ******* ******** ****** ** ***** evaluation ** *** application ** MSE ** homoeopathic *********** ***** and co-researchers affirm that ******** **** ** ********* more ******** **** inferences in ********* a *********** ******** ********** ****** ** ** 2021) This ****** the ************ of *********** phenomenology in ************** a patient’s ************ ********* MSE is **** ************* ** ******** analysis **** assesses the *********** ************* *************** ********* ***** mannerism *** approach ****** *** assessment and ********** *** ********* ******** ** is ********* ** note **** ******* behavior ******* should ** ******** to the clinical encounter The ****** ****** *********** Handbook ************ indicates **** **** physician ********** ****** ****** examination ***** **** ******** present ** the **** of *** interview” ******* ***** ********* ******** ******** ***** ****** ******* mannerisms ** **** ** ********** impaired ************ **** also ********* *** *********** *********** ******* processes and ******* *********** ******* *** *********** level ** ********* *** ****** ********* ** *** ***** hand ******* processes ******* examining *** patient’s organization *** **** of ideas and perception ***** ******* examination identifies *** sobriety ** the patient’s ******** *** ******** ** ******** *** presence ** ************** ********* *** abstract ********** Research indicates **** *** identifies impaired *********** ********* ******* comprehensive ****************** ******* ***** cognitive ********** ********* ****** (Mendez ***** This ********** the ********* ** ***** ********* ********** during ****** core components ** ** *** also include **** *** ****** ********** the **** ********** *** patient’s predominant emotional *********** ***** *** ****** assesses *** *************** ** their ************* ********** *** ********* ** prevailing ********** ** effective *** ****** allow *** ********* ** ******** *** patient’s ****************** ***** thereby ********* their ********* **** of ******* ********** ** ****** ****** ** ** ***** Accordingly *** ********* *** ******* *** *********** *********** through **** analysisScreening ********* ******** an effective *** ***** *** *** clinical ********* ***** ** *** physicians to help examine ********* types of ****** ********* and ******* ****** ** *** *********** medical ******* *** ********** ** ***** ****** ***** *********** * physician ****** approach ********* ********* **** ******* *** *********** *** to the ************* ** ****** ****** ******** *** is ******** to *** **** ** a mental ****** ******* ********* ***** ** *** ********** significance in diagnosing ****** ****** conditions ** ********* *** the ********** ** mental ****** ************ ** ******* **** ********** * ********* *** identify salient ******** ** ************** ****** ** a ******** ****** ****** ******** **** ******* ******** diagnosis ***** ** *********** ***** *** *********** of ************ ********** *********** ********** ******* ***** ** ********* *** **** capacitates *** physician ** tailor ** individualized ********* **** ********* its effectiveness ** ********** the *********** ****** ************ ******* *********** interventions exist *** *** vast ***** ** ****** ********* ********* ** is ***** that in *** **** ** a ****** ****** patient the ********* ********** * ******** treatment **** * situation enabled by ****** ****** *********** ** *** *** core ********** ** ** MSE ****** a ********* to diagnose *** patients and ********* ** ********* ********* intervention *************************** D **** * * & Deepak K * ****** *********** of ****** ****** *********** in ************ ************************ Journal ** ************ ************ 224-230Mendez M * ****** *** mental ****** *********** ******** First Edition Elsevier *************** * * ****** ****** status ****** ** ******** cognitionWaltham *** ******** *** ********************************************** and Related ***************** ******* * ********************* ************** ***** ****** ***** *************** Wciorka J ********* E ****** * Waszkiewicz * ******** * ******* * & ******** P ****** Bech-Rafaelsen ***** ***** *** ***** ***** ****** Scale--comparison ** ************ ********** ** *** *** *********** *** ****** * ***** ******************* Polska45(1) ******** ******* ************** ***** ***** *** ***** ***** ****** ***************** of ************ ********** ** the *** instruments *** ****** * ***** ******** is ************ ******** ** research ** ***** *** ** diagnosing bipolar * ******** ** uses **** ** ************ ******* *** ************ properties ** MAS ******* *** ***** ***** Rating Scale ** ******* *** severity of ***** ******** ******** ** ** ***** Ergo ** probes *** ************* of the scale ** ********** bipolar * *********** article ************ **** a *********** ******* ** *** *** ** *** in ********** *** ******** ** ***** ************** The instrument ************* ****** ********* that ****** *********** *********** scale is ********** *** ********* *** ******** ** ***** ******** ***** ***** *** ******* ********* *** confidence ** the ****** ********** validity by ********** *** diagnostic ****** ******** ******** ** ********** ***** *********** article’s research was ******** on * well-developed ******** ******** ***** ******** the ********** ** ******** ************ hospitalized ***** ********* *** study parameter *********** ** *** patients’ mental ****** using the ************ ************ and *** ******* ** ******** **** ******* ** reliability *** ******** ** *** ******** ***** scales)The study **** ******* a *************** design assessing *** parameters ****************** ********** of the patients’ ****** ****** using *** ***** ****** ******* ************ thereby ********* the assessment ** *** accuracy ** diagnostic ********** *** study *********** ************* addressed **** systemic *** ****** ****** ************* *** ***** ************** ************* ********* *** ******** to ********* ***** ********** ******* *********** random biases Further a ***** *************** ** the ******** ******* ** *** descriptive *************** ** *** ****** *** ********* *********** ******** **** **** ensuring ******** ****************** *** ***** all *********** patients **** assessed thrice with *** three ************** assessing *** ******** ************* *** ***** **** ******** ** *********** after one *** *** ***** ************ ** *** of *** ************** **** ******* judicious *********** ** the ***** to *** ******** ******** ********* *** ******** of *** *************** the article’s ************* ** ********** ** its ******** ********* of *** ********** **** the study aiming ** ******* *** ************* of the *** major ***** ****** scales in assessing *** ******** ** ***** ****************** *** ********* ******** ** *** ROC ***** ** ************* assess the ******* ********** *********** ** the ******** *********** gives insights **** *** *********** *** sensitivity ** each thereby ****** * ******** outcome ** ***** relative reliability *** ******** **** *** ********* ************** of *** ******** easily ******** the *********** *********** ******** *** *********** **** ******** ** ********* ******** ** ******** implying ***** *********** thus ******* their study **** trustHowever *** ******* *** *** *********** ******** in *** ****** **** ************ *** ********** **** * ****** **** ** thirty-five ******** is ********** ************* ********** ******** to ****** *** *********** *********************** *** *** *** ************** ***** ****** ***** ****** ** **** ********* ************* ******** ********** *** ***** ******** ********** ***** to ******* a ******** and ******** bipolar * ******** diagnosis *** instrument’s developer ********* **** the ***** primarily ******* *** ***** ******** ***** (Bech ***** Therefore ** forms only a **** of a comprehensive ******* * ******** ********** ***** *** **** diagnostic ******** apart **** ***** **************** to ****************** MAS *** also measure * ********* response ** ******* besides ********* and ********** The ************* ****** of its use ** ** outcome measure ********* *** *** and ************** manic ******** ******* to compare *** ******** of ******* ********** ********* ***** ***** **** ********* *** ********** ** measuring ******** to ********************* *** ************** ************ ********** *** ** evaluated ** *** principles of *********** and validity ******** analysis ********* **** its ****** ********* ***** ********** ******* ***** ******** ********* **** *** ********** behavior ****** ** * ***** ** ** 6 sufficiently assess *** severity ** manic ****** ascertaining *** ******** (Bech 2002) Further *** instrument **** ******* *********** and test and ******* reliability ensuring *********** ******** ** ** ***** **** ** due ** its *************** ** ***** severity ****************** *** ********** ** primarily ******* ** its ***** on manic ******** ******* * ******** ********* ******** * ***** ******* preceded ** ********* *** ***** ********** ******** ************ *********** ************** ***** ********* the instrument will ****** ******* ** incomplete ********** ** *** ************** ******** *** ************* solely ** diagnosing ******* * ************* ********************************************************************************************************************************