Complete 7 page APA formatted essay: Philosophy Metaphysics on Identity of indiscernables / distinct indiscernables and the bundle theory.Download file to see previous pages... Max Black, in his work

Complete 7 page APA formatted essay: Philosophy Metaphysics on Identity of indiscernables / distinct indiscernables and the bundle theory.

Max Black, in his work The Identity of Indiscernibles, attempts to refute this principle by means of a thought experiment. He claims to prove that it is possible to show that there could be two distinct objects with exactly the same properties. If so, then the PII must be false. Dean Zimmerman, also provides a similar take on the said matter. In this paper, I shall argue that Black and Zimmerman fail to refute the PII. In arguing against them, I shall divide this paper into four main parts. The fist part will discuss Black’s thought experiment, which serves as his refutation of the PII. The second part will discuss Zimmerman’s take on Black’s thought experiment, as well as his defense of the bundle theory, which will also serve as his basis to refute the PII. The third part will deal with the failure of Black and Zimmerman’s arguments in refuting the PII. And finally, the fourth part will be devoted to my defense of the PII. Black’s Two-Sphere World and His Refutation of the PII Black offers a refutation of the principle of identity of indiscernibles (PII) through the use of a thought experiment concerning two spheres. ...

This seems to me to refute the principle (156). Here, A and B are essentially the same with respect to their properties. Thus, distinguishing between accidental and essential properties is irrelevant. Moreover, distinguishing between numerical identity and qualitative similarity is also irrelevant, since what is important are the qualities or properties that both A and B have in common, and not their numerical relation. The latter merely leads us to trivializing the issue. In addition, distinguishing between intrinsic and extrinsic properties also become irrelevant, since this possible world only contains these two spheres. Thus, the extrinsic properties of the spheres turn out to be the same. change in a sphere’s intrinsic property would correspond to a symmetrical change in the other sphere’s intrinsic property as well. Furthermore, the existence of a third party is ruled out from the picture, such as when a possible observer was put to question. This was maintained so as to emphasize that this possible world has only two spheres in it, and nothing more. So it seems that Black was successful in describing a possible world that seemed to refute the PII. Or was he unsuccessful in his attempt? It is in my contention that given the aforementioned thought experiment, Black fails to refute the PII. However, I shall suspend any judgments for the time being. I shall first introduce Zimmerman’s take on the said problem. Zimmerman’s Distinct Indiscernibles and The Bundle Theory Zimmerman agrees with Black insofar that a two-sphere-world where both spheres exist symmetrically towards each other, but are nevertheless two separate spheres altogether, is a possible world.