Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Complete 7 page APA formatted essay: Reconstruct Morhs two arguments concerning the right against outing in The Outing Controversy: Privacy and Dignity in Gay Ethics. Give an argument for one of Morhs
Complete 7 page APA formatted essay: Reconstruct Morhs two arguments concerning the right against outing in The Outing Controversy: Privacy and Dignity in Gay Ethics. Give an argument for one of Morhs arguments being more convincing than the other. Discuss strengths and weaknesses.
Individuals have a right to determine their own sexualities and people argue that it is upon them to determine whether to reveal their sexual orientation to the public or not. Outing is capable of raising a number of norms that become difficult to entangle from each other. It invades the issue of secrecy and privacy of these individuals regarding their sexuality and the orientation of their sexualities.
The more convincing argument is that outing is morally required since outing entails revealing the sexual orientation and not the sexual behaviors of these individuals. According to Morh, arguments against outing are confused and confounded especially the argument that indicates that outing violates the privacy rights. If the required weight is given to the dignity of an individual who is openly gay who outs others, then outing is justified in all matters of course. Outing is permissible and has an expected consequence of the living morally. However, outing could also lead to an individual being wrongly judged in the society since most society members do not accept homosexuality.
Individuals argue that outing invades on the secrecy and the privacy of these individuals. However, this argument confuses the issue of privacy and secrecy. Privacy is the control over access that other individuals have over an individual. Secrecy, occurs when an individual intentionally conceals something often information. Thus, the control over access is the foundation of privacy while hiding is the foundation of secrecy.
The author indicates that if privacy is used to infer to something in a more normative sense, then the application in turn invokes some of the required norms. Any act, possession or even relation that is private in a more normative sense invokes a right to it that bars the unwanted access to it by other people. On one hand, secrecy is one’s thoughts and the inner dialogue including secrecy safeguards the harsh judgments
