Compose a 1000 words essay on English Literature: Compare and Contrast. Needs to be plagiarism free!Download file to see previous pages... The reader is readily able to see as to how the multiple char

Compose a 1000 words essay on English Literature: Compare and Contrast. Needs to be plagiarism free!

The reader is readily able to see as to how the multiple characters mentioned in the passage react to and interpret the events mentioned in the narrative (Kotker, 1996, p. 167). This narrative approach does bring in an element of conviction and veracity into the narrative. Beside the usage of the first person omniscient point of view by the narrator in Voltaire’s Candide allows the writer to sit on the driving seat and get into the minds of all the characters mentioned in the passage with a sense of veracity, without getting barred by the constraints of language and diction (Kotker 1996). This facilitates a greater freedom to the narrator as far as the task of drafting and crafting the narrative is concerned. Besides the omniscient point of view resorted to by the writer in the passage from Voltaire’s Candide is ideally suited to the fabulous and grand adventures as the one being dealt with in the passage. This narrative approach readily allows the writer to maintain a practical distance from the characters mentioned in the passage, thereby allowing one to focus on the actions and emotional concerns and travails of the main characters mentioned in the passage. Contrary to this, the narrator in the excerpt culled out from Gronniosaw’s Narrative affiliates to the first person narrative in the sense that the narrator happens to be one of the characters in the story that uses one’s own voice to tell the story (Disher, 2001, p. 94). The narrator uses the word ‘I’ to refer to himself and is actively involved in narrating the story. Thereby this narrative approach facilitates to the entire narrative the aura of a dairy or a personal memoir, contrary to...

This essay ‘English Literature: Compare and Contrast’ demonstrates two ways of narration in such literature works as Voltaire’s Candide and Gronniosaw’s Narrative. It is quiet apparent that in the passage culled out from Voltaire’s Candide the narrator resorts to the thirds person omniscient point of view in the sense that the narrative is being elucidated upon by a narrator placed outside the narrative who knows everything right from the physical experiences of the involved characters to their inner emotional and psychological plight and their moral dilemmas and concerns. This narrative approach does bring in an element of conviction and veracity into the narrative. Contrary to this, the narrator in the excerpt culled out from Gronniosaw’s Narrative affiliates to the first person narrative in the sense that the narrator happens to be one of the characters in the story that uses one’s own voice to tell the story. This narrative approach on the part of the writer easily enables one to create a character in the narrative by allowing the readers to directly identify with the voice of the central character, which is not so in the passage from Voltaire’s Candide. Thereby, the two given passages are akin to each other in the sense that they are bound around a Christian and moralistic context. Yet, the two narratives tend to differ that the affiliate to two disparate narrative approaches and the extent to which they focus on the innate rot and corruption of the characters mentioned in the narratives.