Compose a 1750 words essay on Communication-(small group analysis ). Needs to be plagiarism free!Download file to see previous pages... Language use is important for the development of effective group

Compose a 1750 words essay on Communication-(small group analysis ). Needs to be plagiarism free!

Language use is important for the development of effective group. The language variation in the various conversations that took place is significant. The age, relationship and nature of conversation changes the language used. For official conversation, the use of a higher degree of politeness and well-structured sentences is vital. The conversation between friends such as the Facebook chat has a level simple and casual language use. The degree on for gestures use in the conversation on the street is high due to the age and the desire for need of emphasis by the use of gestures. The variations in the language also increased with the increase in the understanding of the subject matter. Group cohesion is defined as the total field of forces which make members of a group remain within the group. There are several forces ensuring that members stay in the group, but two main ones factors include. means of control, which is useful for the individual because he derives satisfaction from association with the group (Maude 234). The attractiveness of the group is a factor that includes the desire for interpersonal interactions with other group members and involvement in the activities of the group. Cohesion is the degree to which the group member work together to achieve common goals. There are several factors affecting cohesion namely. environmental factors, personal factors and team factors. Other factors associated with cohesion are team satisfaction. Leadership and communication Leadership can be defined as the ability of an individual to influence, motivate and enable others to work through participation in the organization to which they are members (Northouse, 2009). It is interesting to note that leaders differ significantly from administrators because of their scope of operation. Leaders are innovative while administrator manages. Leaders ask for reasons of occurrence of the activity or process while managers look at the how and when the activity occurs. The focus of managers is on the system as such it does not consider people, but the focus of leaders is on the people. Managers do things right while leaders do the right things. The leaders inspire trust while managers rely on control. Leaders look at long term perspective while managers look at short term perspective. Managers enjoy and accept the status quo, but leaders challenge the status quo. Managers lack originality thereby they tend to copy what others have done or are doing. Leaders do not copy what others have done. they develop new ideas and possibilities as such they go for originality. The leaders have a keen eye on the future or horizon. managers have an eye for the bottom line. Managers tend to emulate the classic good soldier while leaders do not emulate because they are themselves. The difference between leadership and management has been discussed in several studies with leadership sticking out because out its originality and purpose. There are several theories developed to explain and describe the origin and functionality of leadership (Fujishin 123). The major theories are eight and are. “Great Man” theories, Trait theories, contingency theories, behavior theory, situational theory, participative theories, and management theories. These theories were developed during the early parts of the twentieth century and focused on the qualities that differentiated leaders from followers.