Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Compose a 3000 words essay on Conflict in Lorcas Work. Needs to be plagiarism free!Download file to see previous pages ceeding, he himself became a victim of those flaws of the society.Disappointment
Compose a 3000 words essay on Conflict in Lorcas Work. Needs to be plagiarism free!
Download file to see previous pagesceeding, he himself became a victim of those flaws of the society.
Disappointment is reflected at the impossibility of validating the claim of martyrdom from his each and every drama and poetry. a reaction which would be further aggravated by the realization that Lorca, though not by any means the greatest Spanish poet of his time, is the most intensely and nationally Spanish. So much enthusiastic with the spirit of patriotism, that he left the patriotism of an Englishman too far behind him. He is also one of the most narrowly regional of Spanish poets. and at the same time, paradoxically enough, he is the most popular and universal in his appeal both inside and outside of Spain. His appeal is never more universal than when he is writing, at home, about his native Andalusia. It is never more parochial and provincial than when he is self consciously trying to be "cosmopolitan," under the influence of Whitman, in the poems written in, and about, New York and Caribbean. Andalusia is Lorca's "querencia" (The querencia is the exact spot, which every Spanish fighting bull chooses to return to, between his charges, in the arena.) It is his invisible fortress or camp. It is not marked by anything but the bull's preference for it, and may be near the center, near the barricade, or between the two, as the bull chooses. (Lima, 1963) The nearer the bull is to his querencia or stamping-station, the more formidable he is, the more full of confidence, and the more difficult to lure abroad into the territory of the bullfighters, for their territory is wherever the bull is most vulnerable, and least sure of himself.
It is the situation with his writing, for which he is often criticized. Unlike other poets and writers of "day dreaming" attitude, he is a "reflector" of the society, a true "mirror" of the society, such a mirror which does not possess the ability to focus only the "good" things and hide the imperfections, instead he is a true "well wisher" of the society who wants to see his homeland free from the devils of orthodox cultural norms. It is impossible to analyze whether he succeeded or not but one thing is for sure, the society succeeded in eradicating such a wonderful patriotic, such a wonderful writer.
His work possessed the uniqueness of reflecting upon two opposite directions at the same time, revolving around and sometimes in his story, which makes his work identifiable by this unique characteristic.