Create a 4 pages page paper that discusses analytical summaries. However, author Carey, reduces the intensity of his convincing the readers. The author admits that playing a violent video game may not

Create a 4 pages page paper that discusses analytical summaries. However, author Carey, reduces the intensity of his convincing the readers. The author admits that playing a violent video game may not the exclusive reason for the violent crimes. Other factors may have triggered the violent game players to commit felonies and possibly heinous crimes. It just happened that the youth criminals were violent video game enthusiasts. In some areas, statistics show that an increase in the sale of violent video games showed a decline in the actual crime statistics. To avoid committing crimes, the youth vented their anger or grievances on the video game characters, not on real persons.

Author Carey uses several evidences to convincingly support his proposed assertions. Initially, the author uses actual examples to bring his point. The Columbine High School students are purported to act out the fantasy video games’ shooting scenes within the school premises, killing several students and adults. The video gamer acted out the fantasy shooting scenes by killing the Aurora, Colorado Movie audiences.

Next, author Carey uses the findings of social research scientists to persuade the readers. One research affirms violent video games can stir up influentially mild aggressive behavior immediately after playing the games. However, the hostile urges are classified as short term consequences of violent video games. The scientists’ researches validly show shooting video games bring out avoidable hostile personalities among the gamers.

Finally, author Carey discusses an experiment to convince the skeptics. The experiment focuses on 47 student respondents. They play Mortal Kombat for an estimated 14 minutes. Compared to the non-gamers, the findings proved the students playing the video game were more hostile.

However, author Carey insists that the above discussion is not conclusive.