Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Create a 6 pages page paper that discusses harley davidson motor company. This provider consistently scored maximum points in the factors that had the greatest weight. This shows that they have a bett
Create a 6 pages page paper that discusses harley davidson motor company. This provider consistently scored maximum points in the factors that had the greatest weight. This shows that they have a better chance of providing Harley with an ERP system that meets Harley’s most important needs in the most effective way.
The reasons for choosing a provider one are as follows. First, they had the best overall rating for understanding Harley’s requirements. This shows that they took the time to study the needs and the requirements of the company. This made them potentially better placed to innovate as they worked on a solution based on their understanding. The case is that if a provider understands your needs, they have the best chance of providing you with an effective solution even if it is not immediately obvious. Just like Harley believes in providing unique products that meet the specific needs and requirements of each owner, it makes total sense for Harley to work with a provider that has a clear understanding of the needs of the Company.
Secondly, provider 1 had the best overall fit after looking at all the requirements. The provider scored the highest number of “High” scores in all the categories. This point validates the assumption that someone that understands the company’s needs has the best chance of giving the company the best solution. The bigger point here is the fact that Harley has a better chance of getting close to what it wants by using provider 1 compared to the others. The best overall score means that the provider will make fewer mistakes, will require lesser supervision, and will give a solution that will have the least challenges for the company.
Thirdly, provider 1 scored the highest in all the most important aspects of this project. While it is possible to have a situation, where the overall winner does not have the most competitive scores in the most significant aspects, in this situation, provider 1 is also the best one in these factors. . .
