Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Create a 6 pages page paper that discusses the name of the :: hofstede, g., hofstede, j., & minkov, m. (2010). cultures and organizations: software of the mind, (3rd ed.), mcgraw-hill. isbn: 978-0
Create a 6 pages page paper that discusses the name of the :: hofstede, g., hofstede, j., & minkov, m. (2010). cultures and organizations: software of the mind, (3rd ed.), mcgraw-hill. isbn: 978-0-07166418-9. Since there are no empirical evidences which support the idea that one nation or cultural group is superior then the other therefore nations are required to extend their cooperation as they have similar set of problems.
The book itself is an extension of a study conducted by Geert Hofstede on the workforce of IBM. Where the original work helped him analyze people working on same positions and having similar skill set but belonging to different cultures and establish the differences within this workforce, the outcomes helped him define the directives that provided a rationale for these differences. Later editions of this book including Hofstede et al. (2010) contain outputs of other surveys as well. With the help of these researches, Hofstede et al. (2010) concluded that there are four dimensions which define the differences between people with similar expertise but different cultural backgrounds: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, and masculinity/femininity. Hofstede et al. (2010) found through this extensive research that analyzing the culture of various group with the help of these dimensions help in understanding the manner in which their culture is organized.
The world has turned into a global village where cultures are not restricted to countries confined in boundaries and with the emergence of multinational structure of a society, it is important to understand what makes a culture different than the other and also how individuals from one group define their relationships with members of other groups. Similarly, it is important for a group to have an insight of the strength and weaknesses of their own culture so that they can work on these areas accordingly. In Hofstede et al.
