Create a 6 pages page paper that discusses the role of self, attitudes, and behaviour in meeting the challenges of a human rights approach to prison management.

Create a 6 pages page paper that discusses the role of self, attitudes, and behaviour in meeting the challenges of a human rights approach to prison management. The situational framework on crime is a comparatively new criminal justice concept that shifts the focus from the assumed criminal temperament of the offender to the characteristics of the possible crime scene that might motivate or facilitate criminal behavior, as classically manifested in the Stanford Prison Experiment in which imprisoned good men became radically evil. Situational strategies include the methodical manipulation of features of the immediate contexts of potential criminals in an effort to hamper or restrain criminal responses (Toch 1992).

According to the situational framework, behavior can only be understood in relation to the interaction between the attributes of an actor and the features of the immediate environment wherein an act is carried out. Individuals behave differently because of differences in who they are and where they are. Therefore, in order to come up with a comprehensive picture of the challenges confronted by prison management because of issues in self, attitudes, and behavior in total institutions, the situational prison control perspective will be applied.

Prisoner aggression towards staff includes deliberate physical contact and includes pushing, sputtering, throwing objects, hitting, and attacking with a deadly weapon. Physical aggression by prisoners can be differentiated from an array of other types of victimization that a prison officer might endure. The everyday routine of guard includes continuous exposure to hazards and maneuvering by prisoners. Moreover, for officers who are not accustomed to the traditional prison-officer practices, for instance, those taken into account to be too tolerant in their handling of prisoners, victimization may take place at the accountability of other staff members and prison superintendents (Kantrowitz 1996).

Apparently, the nature of the interaction between prisoners and prison officers is relatively different from the interaction among prisoners. this is also referred to as power differential.