Create a 8 pages page paper that discusses minority social influence. The present paper has identified that social influence strategies pave for the efficient allocation of community resources, provid

Create a 8 pages page paper that discusses minority social influence. The present paper has identified that social influence strategies pave for the efficient allocation of community resources, providing social species an evolutionary advantage by gaining sufficient resources for survival. Humans employ various modes of social influence, which are highly adaptive to different environmental and social situations (Weiner, 2003). Techniques can be distinguished in terms of the primary forms of influence: power and deception. While power is associated with the control of the available resources for existence or the promulgation of war, an outright deception fools an organism to do things that covertly do not serve their benefits. That is, social influence employs strategies that apparently based on the social nature of the target organism. In particular, people naturally feel dissonance, value scarce resources, seek phantom goals, fear some events or things, make context-dependent judgment, return a favour, adopt social roles within a social group, and empathize with other individuals. Social influence utilise these human characteristics to evoke processes like conformity or changing one’s belief or behaviour to match with that of the social group, yield to social forces, persuasion or attitude change, and compliance (Weiner, Freedheim, Schinka, and Velicer, 2003). Minority social influence pertains to the influence exerted by the minority group on the members of the majority group (Hewstone and Martin, 2005). Decisions, in various tasks, are made not by a single person but through the consensus of a group. However, members of the group may often have contradicting views on a certain issue that bring chaos in the process of decision making. For instance, juries may possess opposing view on the innocence or guilt of the defendant on a particular crime. This disagreement, generally, is non-equally represented within the group. For a twelve-person jury, for example, only four jurors believe in the innocence of the defendant while the remaining jurors put the blame and legal liability of the crime to the defendant. the defendant’s innocence is expressed by the minority of the jury, whereas the majority claimed the defendant’s guilt.