DIRECTIONS: Answer the prompt(s) below and substantively participate in at least one of your peers' post. That means your replies to your colleagues' posts must be either important to their making im

DIRECTIONS: Answer the prompt(s) below  and substantively participate in at least one of your peers' post. That means your replies to your colleagues' posts must be either important to their making improvements or meaningful to their understanding. 

The minimum word count for original posts is 400 words.

Read the posts and comments prior to yours so you can avoid repeating information others have written. If you want to discuss similar thoughts or observations, reference what others have said and perform one of the following operations:

• add a new insight to the thought or observation
• provide a different example and clarify what additional nuances it reveals
• discuss the causes or implications of the thought or observation, or
• compare, contrast, or otherwise relate the thought or observation to other thoughts or observations, and explain what nuances that process reveals.

Discussion:

Highlight the most important critiques and challenges for narrative criminology and suggests fruitful directions in moving forward. Conclude by making a case for the consolidation and integration of narrative criminology, in hopes that this movement becomes more than an isolated clique.