Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
Discussion boards provide students an opportunity to share their unique perspective, make recommendations, provide an opinion, or answer a question about an issue. Each response should be professional
Discussion boards provide students an opportunity to share their unique perspective, make recommendations, provide an opinion, or answer a question about an issue. Each response should be professional and must be written well (follow rules of grammar and mechanics), clearly, and concisely. In general, students should support each of their claims using empirical evidence, logic and reason, or both. After posting a response, respond to another student's post. When responding to others it is best to add support to their claims or add evidence or logic that goes against their claims. Please remain professional, constructive, and open-minded when responding to those whose perspectives differ.
In this discussion board please first read Giner-Sorolla's paper https://1drv.ms/b/s!Aua1umZ3uq_iiUzMbTG2BTz536-l describing one way to improve psychological science. Then, discuss here 1) your general impressions of the article, and 2) your perspective on ways to reward broader information sharing. Are these practical suggestions? Can you think of other ways to share information about "ugly" data?
- @
- 782 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $10.00. See answer's preview
*** ******* ** ***** illuminating ** *** ******* ******** ****** ************* ******** such ** *********** ************** ******* fraud *** publication **** *** article made ** think ** *** ******* ******* * **** encountered ********** ** **** *** **** ** ******* on *** bottleneck the ****** ****** ** ******* ***** ** *** **** ******** separated ** ******* publication ******* I agree that articles ******* **** to have ******* **** support the hypothesis ********* ** ** ******** ************** 2012)As **** *** ******** ****** ** ********** ***** on *** ****** to ***** it shows *********** ******* *** ************** ***** ************* *** ********* tasked **** ********* perfect-looking results that lead to low ********* ** statistical ********** and ********* ************ ************** ***** These ******* **** impede *** ********* ** cumulative **** *** facilitate ********* ***** *** relationship between ********** *** results ***** harming *********** quest *** ******** **** ** ********* ******* *********** ******* ******* ******* agencies ******** This ****** ****** ** meant *** scientists who are *** shortsighted ** effectively regulate ********** *** *********** **** ** *** ********* *** ********** ******** of any funded ******* *** **** **** ** **** ********** *** considered fraudsters *** ****** **** their ******** ******* ************** ***** Full dissemination ** ******* ****** **** ** extended ** *** institute-supported ******* and **** ***** ******** by the ************* ****** board **** *********** **** ** ********** ** ******* ********* should *** *********** **** ** disseminate ******* in * ******** time ******* ****** *** ************* ****** board ********** *** ** to ***** *** ******** some ******* **** to be ******* *** to ensure **** **** ** *** procedures are ************ inflexible *** **** requirements **** ****** ** biochemical research (Giner-Sorolla ***** Society ****** redefine ******* ** *** ********** ** ****** ** *** the ***** foundation *** ********* *** * ******** ********** ****** ** the ****** ** *********** ********* ********** I ******* *********** ****** **** ************** *** their ******** by including ************ **** ** *********** and ****** ** the ******** *** *********** *** the ************* ** *** ******** results ***** ** *** ******** ******* to ensure **** are ******** *** ready *** *** **** ***************************** * (2012) ******* ** **** How aesthetic standards ****** the way ******* *** *********** ********** *** ********* sciencePerspectives on ************* Science7(6) *******