DO BUSINESSES HAVE MORAL OBLIGATIONS BEYOND WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES? Journal of Business Ethics 15(4) (Apr. 1996): 457-468. James Fieser The classic

Fieser argues that businesses do not and should not be held to have obligations beyond what the law requires. He argues that the moral framework of businesses is and ought to be embedded in law and regulation. Do you find his arguments persuasive? Why or why not?