Do Jungian Archetypes Exist? Please download and read the argument analysis instructions Download argument analysis instructions very carefully. This document includes instructions for the argument an

 Do Jungian Archetypes Exist? Please download and read the argument analysis instructions Download argument analysis instructions very carefully. This document includes instructions for the argument analysis paperand the argument analysis discussion posts.

An example of a argument analysis Download example of a argument analysis paper can be found here.

The articles you will read this week:

Becker & Neuberg (2019) Download Becker & Neuberg (2019)

Barrett (2019) Download Barrett (2019)

In case it is not clear from the instructions, argument analyses always require reading and writing about both sides of the debate.

Once you finish the analysis please upload it below.

Argument Analysis Paper Argument Analysis Paper Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identified and described main claims 15 pts Good (relevancy described, no inaccuracies, thorough 13 pts Satisfactory (relevancy implied, minor inaccuracies, too broad) 11 pts Problematic (relevancy vague, major inaccuracies, lacking completeness) 9 pts Unacceptable (inappropriate, incorrect, incomplete) 15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identified and described supporting evidence (at least 3 pieces of evidence) 20 pts Good (relevancy described, no inaccuracies, thorough 17 pts Satisfactory (relevancy implied, minor inaccuracies, too broad) 15 pts Problematic (relevancy vague, major inaccuracies, lacking completeness) 13 pts Unacceptable (inappropriate, incorrect, incomplete) 20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluated the supporting evidence 20 pts Good (relevancy described, no inaccuracies, thorough 17 pts Satisfactory (relevancy implied, minor inaccuracies, too broad) 15 pts Problematic (relevancy vague, major inaccuracies, lacking completeness) 13 pts Unacceptable (inappropriate, incorrect, incomplete) 20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Interpretation and integration 15 pts Good (relevancy described, no inaccuracies, thorough 13 pts Satisfactory (relevancy implied, minor inaccuracies, too broad) 11 pts Problematic (relevancy vague, major inaccuracies, lacking completeness) 9 pts Unacceptable (inappropriate, incorrect, incomplete) 15 ptsTotal Points: 70