Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
QUESTION
each of the studies, how did Golub, Gilbert and Wilson (2009) operationally define the positive expectations How did they operationally define affect?...
- For each of the studies, how did Golub, Gilbert and Wilson (2009) operationally define the positive expectations How did they operationally define affect?
- In experiments 1A and 1B, what were the independent variable(s)? What were the dependent variable(s)?
- This article includes three different studies. In this case what are the advantages to answering the research question using multiple methods?
- On what basis did the authors conclude, "our studies suggest that the affective benefits of negative expectations may be more elusive than their costs" (p. 280)
- Evaluate the external validity of the two experiments and one filed study thatGolub, Gilbert and Wilson (2009) conducted.
- How good was the internal validity?
- Golub, S.A., Gilbert, D.T. & Wilson, T. D. (2009) Anticipating one's troubles: The costs and benefits of negative expectations. Emotion, 9, 227-281.doi: 10.1037/a0014716
