English

Rogerian Argument Essay

(10%)

Important Dates:Topic and working thesis due in class Friday, February 10 Essay due: Friday, February 17See syllabus for late paper penaltyRevisions (if you choose to do one) will be due two weeks after the paper is returned to you.

Purpose and objectives

·      Demonstrate knowledge of the principles and features of a Rogerian argument by writing on a topic of your choosing

·      Address and analyze the opposing perspective (reader’s view) while establishing your position with supporting evidence

·      Propose a compromise that incorporates the collaborative and fair-minded spirit of the Rogerian argument

The Specifics

·      Must be 3-4 pages, double spaced

·      Times New Roman, 12 pt font

·      Hook and Title

·      Sources: Must include at least three acceptable sources with proper in-text citation and a Works Cited page (APA or MLA)

Choosing a topic and position

As discussed in class and mentioned in the text, Rogerian arguments are particularly effective for emotionally charged, controversial topics. So I would encourage you to select a topic that you feel connected to in some way, but please avoid general, “overly-argued” topics that have been argued excessively (not “the death penalty is bad”). ‘Controversial’ doesn’t mean your topic has to be heavy, or necessarily life or death, however. What makes you mad? What gets you fired up politically or socially? Is there a local issue you’ve been following closely that would lend itself to this type of argument? Please feel free to chat with me about your topic if there are any concerns or questions.

A word on sources

No Wikipedia or Quora or anything in that shady/academically unsuitable vein.

·       Acceptable: Credible, Updated, Trustworthy Websites (.edu, .org or .gov)

·       Relevant news articles from reputable news organizations (using the criteria we will discuss in class)

·       Academic Journal Articles (through library database)

·       Government Reports

·       Primary Sources (e.g. “Official Notices” source on page 199 under Works Cited) As the writer, keep in mind the following goals and objectives:

• Establish an emphatic persona, using neutral, non-threatening language throughout the paper
• Identify and discuss specific points and instances in which opposing assertions are valid (this should include one of your sources)
• Show where your position and  assertions are valid and support (at least two sources here)
• In your conclusion, seek compromise, address mutual benefits and appeal to a higher interest for both parties

General Structure – below is a framework you can follow for your paper which also includes the major components I will be looking for when reviewing and grading:

Introduction

·      Hook.

·      Sets up the problem in appropriate language and establishes common ground

• Explain the issue's significance and scope
• Two-part thesis statement that acknowledges the other side as well as your argument (using the “Despite/Although/While” language discussed in Writing Workshop)

Statement of the Reader’s view of the problem

·      Include your acknowledgement/concessions/merit in their side (one source here)

Statement of your side: Writer’s side

·      Present and discuss your evidence (two sources here)

·      Address how the reader would benefit from seeing your side (statement of mutual benefits)

Conclusion

·      Convey possible compromise