Following the debate activity that we did in class on the validity of Trophy Hunting, we will continue albeit individually and in writing.  I want you to write a coherent essay that 1) describes the

Following the debate activity that we did in class on the validity of Trophy Hunting, we will continue albeit individually and in writing.  I want you to write a coherent essay that 1) describes the problem or issue being addressed, 2) discusses what the solution being offered aims to accomplish, 3) presents your view on this solution, and in your reply to a classmate 4) provide your reaction to the arguments and claims made from the opposite position of yours.

To restate the question we debated, "Is the practice of commercialized trophy hunting a valid means for improving the conservation outcomes of endangered or otherwise threatened animal populations?" 

I want you to use some of the articles I posted in the earlier announcement, found here: https://asu.instructure.com/courses/11125/discussion_topics/309349.  But by all means feel free to supplement your essay with facts and figures you may encounter through additional research into this question.  I want to see a well formulated argument in favor of or in opposition to this solution, but one that still addresses what those who may disagree with you would say, not just a litany of your side's opinions.