StudyDaddy Management

Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.

QUESTION

Aug 28, 2017

for njosh only

Discussion 1

Week 3, prompt option #1: Creating an Inductively Strong argument

This week we are learning about the power of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is not only extremely common, but it can also provide very good evidence for conclusions. This discussion prompt allows you to present an inductive version of the argument that you have been developing in this course.

Prepare: To prepare to write this discussion, read Chapters 5 and 6, focusing especially the section on “Strengthening Inductive Reasoning” in Chapter 5. Take a look as well at the required resources from this week, including What is a Strong Argument? [Link]

Reflect: Create a new (and improved) version of the argument that you have been developing throughout this course or create an argument for one of the premises of that argument. Try to make sure that all of your premises are true and that your reasoning is inductively strong. Again, consider how someone with the opposite point of view might criticize your argument and see if you can improve it to avoid those objections.

Write: Present your argument in standard form and explain any weaknesses that might remain. A weakness could mean a premise that many might disagree with or questions about the strength of the inference. Indicate briefly how you might address those weaknesses to strengthen your argument further. What further information might strengthen your argument the most?

Guided Response: Read the arguments presented by your classmates and analyze the reasoning that they have presented. Comment on the strength of their reasoning. Help them out by pointing out any respect in which a reasonable person might disagree with the truth of their premises or with the strength of their reasoning. Give suggestions for how the argument might be improved. If someone presents good suggestions for your own argument respond with an improved version of the argument.

Reply Reply to Comment

HTML Editor Rich Content Editor

Attach

Cancel Post Reply

Previous Previous: Week 3 - Lectures Next Next: Week 3 - Discussion 2

Insert Content into the Page

Links
Images

Link to other content in the course. Click any page to insert a link to that page.

Wiki Pages

Course Calendar
Course Grading
Course Home
Faculty Expectations
Recommended Resources
Required Resources
Start Here
Week 1 - Lectures
Week 1 - Overview
Week 1 - Resources
Week 2 - Lectures
Week 2 - Overview
Week 2 - Resources
Week 3 - Lectures
Week 3 - Overview
Week 3 - Resources
Week 4 - End of Course Survey
Week 4 - Lectures
Week 4 - Overview
Week 4 - Resources
Week 5 - Lectures
Week 5 - Overview
Week 5 - Resources

Assignments

Assignment List
Final Grade
Week 1 - Assignment
Week 1 - Critical Thinking Quiz
Week 1 - Discussion
Week 1 - Post Your Introduction
Week 1 - Quiz
Week 2 - Discussion 1
Week 2 - Discussion 2
Week 2 - Quiz
Week 3 - Assignment
Week 3 - Discussion 1
Week 3 - Discussion 2
Week 3 - Quiz
Week 4 - Discussion 1
Week 4 - Discussion 2
Week 4 - Journal
Week 4 - Quiz
Week 5 - Discussion
Week 5 - End of Course Survey
Week 5 - Final Paper
Week 5 - Quiz

Quizzes

Quiz List
Week 1 - Critical Thinking Quiz
Week 3 - Quiz
Week 4 - Quiz
Week 5 - End of Course Survey
Week 1 - Quiz
Week 5 - Quiz
Week 2 - Quiz

Announcements

Announcements List
Week 3 Guidance
Week 2 Handout
Week 2 Guidance
Week 1 Guidance
Week 5 Guidance
Week 4 Guidance
Welcome to PHI103!
24/7 Support
How do you get Sociology into your studies?

Discussions

Discussion Index
Week 2 - Discussion 1
Week 2 - Discussion 2
Week 1 - Discussion
Week 1 - Post Your Introduction
Week 5 - Discussion
Week 4 - Discussion 2
Week 4 - Discussion 1
Week 3 - Discussion 2
Week 3 - Discussion 1
Ashford Café
Ask Your Instructor

Modules

Modules List
Ask Your Instructor
Course Home
Week 1
Week 5
Week 4
Week 3
Week 2

Course Navigation

Assignment List
Wiki Home
Discussions Index
Course Syllabus
Announcement List
Files Index
Collaborations
Grades
People
Modules

Click any image to embed the image in the page.

Find images on flickr creative commons

Uploading file...

0 more to upload

Drop Images Here to upload

course_7887

Select a destination folder for these files:

Upload Files to Folder Cancel

96cfa7f7-7caa-4c1e-844b-9b633f021e90

In order to create video or audio recordings your computer needs to be webcam-enabled. If you don't have a webcam on your computer, you can still record audio-only messages by first installing the Google Video Chat plugin.

Install the Video Plugin

Don't have a webcam?

Discussion 2

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first post in the discussion forum. The requirements for the discussion this week are a minimum of four posts on four separate days, including responses to at least two classmates. The total combined word count for all of your posts, counted together, should be at least 600 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly.

In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.

Assignment

This paper assignment expands upon your Week One Assignment and prepares you for the Final Paper. The expansion is to learn to improve one’s argument after investigating and fairly representing the opposite point of view. The main new tasks are to revise your previous argument created in Week One, to present a counterargument (an argument for a contrary conclusion), and to develop an objection to your original argument.

Here are the steps to prepare to write the counterargument paper:

Begin reviewing your previous paper paying particular attention to suggestions for improvement made by your instructor.
Revise your argument, improving it as much as possible, accounting for any suggestions and in light of further material you have learned in the course. If your argument is inductive, make sure that it is strong. If your argument is deductive, make sure that it is valid.
Construct what you take to be the strongest possible argument for a conclusion contrary to the one you argued for in your Week One paper. This is your counterargument. This should be based on careful thought and appropriate research.
Consider the primary points of disagreement between the point of view of your original argument and that of the counterargument.
Think about what you take to be the strongest objection to your original argument and how you might answer the objection while being fair to both sides. Search in the Ashford University Library for quality academic sources that support some aspect of your argument or counterargument.

In your paper,

Present a revised argument in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.
Present a counterargument in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.
Provide support for each premise of your counterargument. Clarify the meaning of the premise and supporting evidence for the premise.
- Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments, or other ways of demonstrating the truth of the premise (for more ideas about how to support the truth of premises take a look at the instructor guidance for this week). This section should include at least one scholarly research source. For guidance about how to develop a conclusion see the Ashford Writing Center’s Introductions and Conclusions (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Explain how the conclusion of the counterargument follows from its premises. [One paragraph]
Discuss the primary points of disagreement between sincere and intelligent proponents of both sides. [One to two paragraphs]
- For example, you might list any premises or background assumptions on which you think such proponents would disagree and briefly state what you see as the source of the disagreement, you could give a brief explanation of any reasoning that you think each side would find objectionable, or you could do a combination of these.
Present the best objection to your original argument. Clearly indicate what part of the argument your objection is aimed at, and provide a paragraph of supporting evidence for the objection. Reference at least one scholarly research source. [One to two paragraphs]
- See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of your primary textbook for more information about how to present an objection.

For further instruction on how to create arguments, see the How to Construct a Valid Main Argument (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and Tips for Creating an Inductively Strong Argument (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. documents as well as the video Constructing Valid Arguments (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the following Week Three Annotated Example (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Let your instructor know if you have questions about how to complete this paper.