Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Article review/critic. It needs to be at least 1000 words.This purpose is clearly stated in the article and one is able to note it before he comple

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Article review/critic. It needs to be at least 1000 words.

This purpose is clearly stated in the article and one is able to note it before he completes to read the abstract and introduction.

The terms used in the study are relevant and clearly defined for instance the use the word post bereavement to mean a former caregiver for a deceased is relevant since caregivers are more emotionally attached to the patients they have a hard time to accept and continue with their life after the death of their sick patients (Chochinov & Breitbart, 2009). The variables are clearly stated and they are relevant to the study as they provide the basic information from which data is based and how much one can rely on the data.

Most of the assumptions are not clearly stated and thus are hard to identify the only assumption that is clearly stated is the notion that the health professionals assume that the caregivers will implement their own coping strategies, thus they do not require any help on how to cope with the difficulties they face. This is wrong since the article clearly illustrates that the caregivers should be educated on the best ways to be good caregivers and maintain their health thus they should not neglect themselves. Due to lack of this education, most of the caregivers’ health has depreciated due to neglecting themselves (Chochinov & Breitbart, 2009). This is evident in the article.

The author uses qualitative design in the data of the article. Data was collected from a sample of patients with terminal cancer from Southern Community Hospice Program. The sample is clearly shown but the hypothesis is not clearly shown (Berzoff & Silverman, 2004). The data collected is reliable since all those who participated in the questionnaire program were willing and they even gave more than what was asked thus providing more information. The notion of the same person asking the question to a particular caregiver makes the information more reliable since the questionnaire was carried out severally. The interviewee and interviewer