Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Comparison Between Humbaba in Gilhgamesh and Polyphemus in Odyssey as Outside Monsters. It needs to be at least 1250 words.Download file to see pre
Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Comparison Between Humbaba in Gilhgamesh and Polyphemus in Odyssey as Outside Monsters. It needs to be at least 1250 words.
Download file to see previous pages...These poems tell us about the morality of humans despite the bitter fact that life is short and humans have to die but it is the humanity and nobility of hearts that live forever without any doubts. Both the stories are quite similar in their meaning and understanding however, the only difference is the rise and powers of the heroes. The stories revolve around the powers of gods, monsters and spirits. Thesis Statement ‘Humbaba and Polyphemus were the outside monsters who lived outside humanity because they were different from humans and both of them had a hostile attitude towards humans.’ Analysis of the Statement The two monsters that are mentioned by the poets play an important role in developing the better understanding of humanity. It is important to understand the fact that has been highlighted in these pieces of literature which can be analyzed through the actions taken by these monstrous characters, the responses showed by the main characters against the actions or even the characteristics that these monsters possess. all of these are the basic components that describe how the term ‘humanity’ can be best defined. ...
as ‘taboo’ by some individuals and some even disowned. they include the desire of living in isolation or reluctance to work for their own survival. Both of the monsters clearly represent the idea that they are different from the entire human race. It is not just their physical appearances that make them different from the humans but also their inhuman actions. For example, although the Cyclops had sufficient food on his “fertile land” (9, 113), he still had a desire to eat Odysseus’ men without any purpose. This behavior of possessing the unnecessary trait of cannibalism is a key difference that separates the monsters from the humans. Humbaba had a demon-like physical exterior, as well as the ability to breathe fire and death. Similarly, Polyphemus is described by Odysseus as a monster or “Freak of nature, not like men who eat bread, But like a lone wooded crag high in the mountains” (9, 184-185). In addition to this, Polyphemus was able to move even the hardest massive rocks or the mountains, which also describes him as a super-power creature unlike any human. Certainly, these monsters cannot be termed as humans due to the presence of various non-human traits. Both creatures wanted to infuse terror in the minds of humans through their abilities and physical appearances which made them realize that humans are afraid of their non-human traits. Both monsters had a hostile behavior towards humanity due to the fact that they kept distances from it. Both of them lived in complete isolation which can even turn any individual into the same manner if placed in the same situation. Odysseus describes this in the following way: “This was the lair of a huge creature, a man, Who pastured his flocks off by himself, And lived apart from other and knew no law.