Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on La Greca, Lochman and Silvermans Moving Beyond Efficacy and Effectiveness in Child and Adolescent Intervention Research. It needs to be at least 10

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on La Greca, Lochman and Silvermans Moving Beyond Efficacy and Effectiveness in Child and Adolescent Intervention Research. It needs to be at least 1000 words.

The fundamental thesis of the researchers is that evidence-based treatments are effective strategies in approaching mental disorders. In order to explain this, the article explored three important areas, namely: the transition from theory into practical applications by moving towards disseminating treatments in community setting. moving towards personalized mental health care. and, finally, the research on the use of evidence-based model of treatment. These elements are logically presented with a wealth of evidence culled from the extant body of literature on the subject, with a diverse range of sources for every argument and position established. This is an important characteristic of the research design. There was no section explaining the methodological design employed but based on the structure of the article and the methodologies by which the objective was achieved, the design qualifies as longitudinal research framework. This is the case because the research does not use several and diverse sources to describe and analyze a phenomenon, which could make it a cross-sectional research. For instance, when the researchers compared how Evidence-based treatments fared against Usual Care, they cited the work of Weisz et al. No other work was presented. Throughout the section, the researchers discussed Weisz's findings and endorsed his arguments and used some of his points to support their own. This is the dominant approach throughout the research. There are instances wherein several sources were used but these involve mostly two sources, which is not enough to triangulate or corroborate evidence. In addition, these sources were used as support. hence, no opposing finding or argument was included in order to establish some semblance of balance that would accord the research the legitimacy of truly comparing several works. The diversity of sources is also confined to sections providing introductory and background information. The definition or the parameters that make up longitudinal research is still evolving (Menard, 2002, p. 2). This, in addition to the fact that the model is composed of several other approaches, makes it a convenient model for this particular research. Specifically, one can identify case studies as the researchers focused on specific research for a particular point. Then, there is also the attempt at comparing variables between different time periods, although these variables are few and not sufficiently explored, compared and analyzed. There is, however, one excellent section that involved a credible and truly comparative analysis on a particular variable involving at least three sources in varying time periods. This is the section about mediation research. Here, at least three articles were identified as sources and they were examined comprehensively. The section also included an in-depth analysis and comparison of arguments, which enabled the section to provide authoritative concluding statements. The strength of this research rests on the solidity and consistency of its arguments. All the sources and data used worked to validate the thesis. It is also well structured, which implied a systematic and coherent case for the arguments of the researchers in their discourse on evidence-based treatments. It started with a comprehensive background and divided the entire research into clear issues, crucial to the subject being examined. But the above-cited strength is also the research’s weak point. The result is one-dimensional study because most the evidences are not comprehensive, diverse and balanced.