Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on conceptual crisis in the common law of the contract of employment Paper must be at least 750 words. Please, no plagiarized work!
Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on conceptual crisis in the common law of the contract of employment Paper must be at least 750 words. Please, no plagiarized work! In fact, the terms of the owners of the parking garage could be considered to be legally unreasonable and therefore there could indeed be grounds for a lawsuit against them.
This is due to the fact that within the UCTA 1977 Act and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, there have been many clauses within company terms rendered ineffective due to the fact that they are totally infeasible (MacDonald 2004, p. 69). .
One case that was found to have unreasonable terms and of which the defendant won was in AEG Ltd v. Logic Resource Ltd (Bradgate 1997, p. 582). Of course, though this was not a case that involved any form of injury to the defendant it could have resulted in the loss of profit and adversity for the company. Therefore based on the laws of the UCTA 1977 Act, the defendant was awarded that which he was asking in the case due to the unreasonableness of the plaintiff's terms in the contract. This could be viewed in a similar light in regards to Helen's case and the terms in the parking garage.
