Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on critical analysis of culture war: the myth of a polarized america authored by fiorina, morris, samuel j. abrams & jeremy c. pope Paper must be a

Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on critical analysis of culture war: the myth of a polarized america authored by fiorina, morris, samuel j. abrams & jeremy c. pope Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! The authors agree that even though there are close divisions among Americans on national issues, there was no evidence of deeply rooted divisions (7). However, Morris, Abrams and Pope reveal that an appearance of the deeply divided citizenry arises from polarized politicians (8-9). Conversely, the American political parties are deeply divided by true divisions evident in their opinions and the manner they use them to have a competitive advantage over the opponent. Chapter 2 has confirmed the myth of division through the terminology confusion because of closely competitive last elections and the perception of a divided electorate. The chapter adds on the aspects of most population while avoiding the political class for its polarization and time devoted to come up with strong opinions, media filtration of who gets airwaves or print pages, and political candidates influence on the decision of the voters. These divisions only exaggerate the actual variations among Americans and make them think they are deeply divided (15). In chapter three, Morris, Abrams, and Pope highlight that in a two-party nation, there is an almost exactly evenly match in the ratio1:1. This closeness is cited by Morris, Abrams, and Pope as an era of indecision with the largest group of voters being self-dependent and moderates in both the red and blues (24). In my opinion, indecision does not last since an American has to believe in something and not remain like an atheist, which results to no strong ties to the red or blue side hence not primary conflict. Chapter four goes beyond defining polarization by political affiliations of red and blue to consider other factors like age, party identification, education, race, gender, and religion. However, these factors demonstrate depolarization in intergroup dissimilarities. From Morris, Abrams, and Pope, only gay rights and abortion while the other evidence indicates no more divisions compared to the past (48).