Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on key principles of tortuous liability and negligence as the concept in legal studies Paper must be at least 2250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!
Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on key principles of tortuous liability and negligence as the concept in legal studies Paper must be at least 2250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! Severn bridge Metropolitan Council must, therefore, ensure that the buildings do not cause potential harm to visitors of the building or passers-by. If an incident does happen wherein a part of the properties of Severnbridge Metropolitan Council falls and injures a person, it will be Severnbridge Metropolitan Council who will need to pay for damages for injuring that person, since tortuous liability will be applied. Therefore, even though the injured party and Severnbridge Metropolitan Council are not bound by any contractual obligations or contractual liabilities, the Metropolitan Council would still be bound by tortuous liability.
On the other hand, contractual liability is created when there is a promise between two or more parties to perform a duty or obligation for another. For example, if Severn bridge Metropolitan Council has promised one of its clients that the council will ensure that no harm would come to any of his clients when they visit their offices, however  .if one of the clients is injured by the debris in one of the council buildings, contractual liability would apply to the Severn bridge Metropolitan Council. . The primary differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are that contractual liability is voluntary in nature, whereas tortuous liability and is an obligation imposed by law. The contractual liability is strict whereas a tortuous liability is established on the platform of fault. Another major difference between the two is that in the case of contractual liability, a person is found to be guilty when he’s not performed an action which he should have performed, whereas, in tortuous liability, the person is proved . to be guilty when he has performed an action which he should not have performed.
