Hi, I need help with essay on Conflicting Viewpoints. Paper must be at least 1000 words. Please, no plagiarized work!The doubting game is opposite to the believing game and requires an individual to c

Hi, I need help with essay on Conflicting Viewpoints. Paper must be at least 1000 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

The doubting game is opposite to the believing game and requires an individual to contest a certain idea or subject (Elbow, 2006). The doubting and believing game can be played by one acknowledging the fact that there are two sides to every argument. In the believing game, the students may assess each point uniquely and find the good things about it. These can then be used to help the students believe the point which may otherwise be different from their own. The doubting game is simpler as it is easier to identify error than to believe in something (Elbow, 2008). Hence, in this game individuals may assess a point and look what is accurate and what is in accurate. Hence, concluding that all the information that they assume to be inaccurate is incorrect and create an opinion based on the inaccuracy. An example of an issue that has been widely discussed is euthanasia and whether it should be legalized. Each individual has a right to live which consequently means he or she has a right to die hence euthanasia should be legalized.

People who are against the legalization of euthanasia state that this could lead to a slippery slope (“Euthanasia Pros and Cons”, n.d). This view is valid and interesting as allowing the killing of a human being raises the question on where a line should be drawn. If euthanasia is permitted people will start to question other aspects of morality. This raises an even bigger problem as morality is not factual but subjective. Hence, if allowing a morally objected matter such as the killing of innocent human beings for any purpose other morals in society will come into question. If I possessed this belief I would see the need to change many aspects in society and revise the definition of murder as euthanasia is an act of killing another human being. The slippery slope could be true in many different cases involving hospital ethics and society’s views for murder