Hi, I need help with essay on Sociology: Family and the Idea of Slavery. Paper must be at least 2000 words. Please, no plagiarized work!Download file to see previous pages... Aristotle had no qualms w

Hi, I need help with essay on Sociology: Family and the Idea of Slavery. Paper must be at least 2000 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

Aristotle had no qualms with the idea of slavery and he perceived it as a natural state of being for some people, especially for those who were below the set standards of people in society. He assumed that some people were simply born to be rulers, that it as an in bred quality or trait and came from the genes where as those born into poverty would not little else than the lower statures of life and never fulfill a role that was of equal quality. Thereby was one of his main philosophical standpoints into the reasoning in behind slavery and its existence (1997). One of Aristotle's statements that were heavily debated by Rousseau himself was the one that can be found included below:

The difference between these two philosophers is found where, Aristotle's perception is that people are simply sometimes in life circumstances that accentuate their personalities and actions as those characteristic of a slave (1997). Rousseau, on the other hand counter acts this implied belief by stating that people are not naturally slaves but what causes them to succumb to this type of mentality is by being born into slavery yet having no free will to choose one way or another how they want to be perceived (1997). Rather they are forced, by the very act of them being born, to be slaves for indefinite periods of time, sometimes to their deaths. Therefore, Rousseau's theory is that, when an individual is born into a slave type of environment, where everyone is termed slaves and un-free, with no choices for themselves, no hope for the future it seems, then their comprehension of their life switches from good to bad, from having hope to having none. When they do not have the ability to associate their own being with anything else besides the view of slavery then they begin to portray all the traits that are derivative of slave life 2

Rousseau was characteristic of many of the beliefs held by Locke and Hobbes. He focused on a state of nature in his writings and subsequently drew society together in his, 'social contract theory'3 (1997). The difference between Locke and Rousseau lies in the fact that Rousseau believed people brought reasoning into the political and even the daily factions of life. He believed without sound reasoning in behind many ideas of the people, the result would be fruitless and illogical. Locke, on the other hand did not see this as a proper concept.