Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Hi, I need help with essay on What was Northern Learning and why did some Korean scholars advocate it Why did others oppose it How do you evaluate Northern Learning (and Practical Learning) in the con
Hi, I need help with essay on What was Northern Learning and why did some Korean scholars advocate it Why did others oppose it How do you evaluate Northern Learning (and Practical Learning) in the context of economic development. Paper must be at least 250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!
The learning borrowed ideas from the neighboring China, which had a more orderly social, economic, military and political structure as compared to Korea. Some ideas were borrowed from Europe through the Catholic missionaries (Choi, 2006).
There was a rapid change in the economic structure in Korea such that large scale farming was being adopted in the rural areas and wholesale and large-scale production was being adopted in the urban areas. As a result of this, many small-scale farmers lost their land in the rural areas to the large-scale farmers, and the small business owners were pushed out of business in the urban areas. There was a wide margin amid the rich and poor creating a wide social gap (Kim, 1981). Some scholars in Korea during that time developed a form of learning that would address these problems in a more practical way in Korea. The Northern learning took into consideration the culture, history, religion and geography of the Korean people alongside with the ideas borrowed from the neighboring countries to develop solutions to the political, social and economic problems they observed in their society (Setton, 1997). This form of learning received direct criticism especially from the ruling class and the wealthy merchants and farmers of the day since it attacked their privileges directly and criticized their methods of thriving and ruling (Kalton, 1975).
Northern learning was developed over a period of time after a careful analysis of the challenges facing the people of Korea. It provided more practical solutions to the problems of a young developing nation. This approach is more suitable to most developing countries today since it is not biased to a single culture, but it incorporates ideas from many cultures yet still maintains the culture of the Korean people (Palais,
