Hi, need to submit a 1000 words essay on the topic Critically assess Evolutionary Psychology's Explanations of Sex Differences in Human Behaviour.Download file to see previous pages... The Essentialis

Hi, need to submit a 1000 words essay on the topic Critically assess Evolutionary Psychology's Explanations of Sex Differences in Human Behaviour.

The Essentialist view discusses the origin of differences based on sex based on inducements that are inherent by virtue of being a human being (Anselmi &amp. Law, 1998). This perspective is often viewed as an alternative version to traditional sociology and meta-theory disciplines. The inconsistency in the notion of sex differences across a wide range of social backgrounds is incorporated into the Social Constructionist perspective. This is best understood by examining the underlying differences in the analysis of the genders across a range of social settings. Sexuality is defined as behavior linked to sexual aspects that are inherent by virtue of our being human beings and that lead to predisposed forms of sexual behaviors (Buss, 1989). This enhances the possibilities of the passing on of genes to future generations. The notion of selection of mates in the human race has given birth to extensive research regarding the prominent level of differences between the traits required by both genders in their potential partners (Buss, 1989). The era of mass production and division of labor gave birth to the notion of men being stereotyped as the bread winners and women being succumbed to being looked upon as nurturing and potential child bearers (Jureidini &amp. Poole, 2002). This resulted in the concept of a patriarchal society that where the societal norms attributed aggressiveness to men and passiveness to women. According to this view, men were seen as the initiators of the reproductive process owing to the desire to command paternal attributes for which they adopted the highly risky game theory (strategy) in order to attract their desired mates (Miller, 2000). Women, on the other hand, were viewed as being spontaneously attracted to men owing to their “nurturing” nature and desire to care and look after their offspring (Miller, 2000). In a cross-study conducted by Buss it was discovered that men desired attractiveness and youth from their mates, whereas women desired men who were financially strong and had established careers (Buss, 1989). Psychologists from the evolutionary school, however, have demonstrated little attempt to bridge the notion of social and cultural quality. The Social Constructionist perspective focuses on the fact that the purpose of selection on one’s mates reflects an individual’s ability to derive the maximum benefit out of their tools with respect to the choices concerning the mating process. Therefore, the institution of marriage in this light is seen as an interaction between utility-maximizing men and women who seek stability in life through profitable exchanges (Becker, 2000). This view implies that the sex differences in the process of mate selection arise primarily due to profitable economic exchanges rather than in-built predisposed sexual behavior, heavily downplaying the fundamental reasoning of evolutionary psychologists. Hence, this view states that the reasoning behind selection of mates rests on the societal, cultural and environmental influences of the world in which we dwell which is depicted by the notion of gender roles ascribed by division of labor (Eagly &amp. Wood, 1999). The above mentioned differences in viewpoints of psychologists from various schools are partially ascribed to the background and circumstances under which these psychologists grew up.